A research agenda on the management of intra-abdominal candidiasis: Results from a consensus of multinational experts

Matteo Bassetti, Monia Marchetti, Arunaloke Chakrabarti, Sergio Colizza, Jose Garnacho-Montero, Daniel H. Kett, Patricia Munoz, Francesco Cristini, Anastasia Andoniadou, Pierluigi Viale, Giorgio Della Rocca, Emmanuel Roilides, Gabriele Sganga, Thomas J. Walsh, Carlo Tascini, Mario Tumbarello, Francesco Menichetti, Elda Righi, Christian Eckmann, Claudio ViscoliAndrew F. Shorr, Olivier Leroy, George Petrikos, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

121 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) may include Candida involvement of peritoneum or intra-abdominal abscess and is burdened by high morbidity and mortality rates in surgical patients. Unfortunately, international guidelines do not specifically address this particular clinical setting due to heterogeneity of definitions and scant direct evidence. In order to cover this unmet clinical need, the Italian Society of Intensive Care and the International Society of Chemotherapy endorsed a project aimed at producing practice recommendations for the management of immune-competent adult patients with IAC. Methods: A multidisciplinary expert panel of 22 members (surgeons, infectious disease and intensive care physicians) was convened and assisted by a methodologist between April 2012 and May 2013. Evidence supporting each statement was graded according to the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Diseases (ESCMID) grading system. Results: Only a few of the numerous recommendations can be summarized in the Abstract. Direct microscopy examination for yeast detection from purulent and necrotic intra-abdominal specimens during surgery or by percutaneous aspiration is recommended in all patients with nonappendicular abdominal infections including secondary and tertiary peritonitis. Samples obtained from drainage tubes are not valuable except for evaluation of colonization. Prophylactic usage of fluconazole should be adopted in patients with recent abdominal surgery and recurrent gastrointestinal perforation or anastomotic leakage. Empirical antifungal treatment with echinocandins or lipid formulations of amphotericin B should be strongly considered in critically ill patients or those with previous exposure to azoles and suspected intra-abdominal infection with at least one specific risk factor for Candida infection. In patients with nonspecific risk factors, a positive mannan/antimannan or (1→3)-β-d-glucan (BDG) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test result should be present to start empirical therapy. Fluconazole can be adopted for the empirical and targeted therapy of non-critically ill patients without previous exposure to azoles unless they are known to be colonized with a Candida strain with reduced susceptibility to azoles. Treatment can be simplified by stepping down to an azole (fluconazole or voriconazole) after at least 5-7 days of treatment with echinocandins or lipid formulations of amphotericin B, if the species is susceptible and the patient has clinically improved. Conclusions: Specific recommendations were elaborated on IAC management based on the best direct and indirect evidence and on the expertise of a multinational panel.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2092-2106
Number of pages15
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume39
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Abdominal infections
  • Candida
  • Consensus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A research agenda on the management of intra-abdominal candidiasis: Results from a consensus of multinational experts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this