A research agenda for radiation oncology

Results of the Radiation Oncology Institute's comprehensive research needs assessment

Reshma Jagsi, Justin E. Bekelman, Otis Brawley, Joseph O. Deasy, Quynh Thu Le, Jeff M. Michalski, Benjamin Movsas, Charles R. Thomas, Colleen A. Lawton, Theodore S. Lawrence, Stephen M. Hahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To promote the rational use of scarce research funding, scholars have developed methods for the systematic identification and prioritization of health research needs. The Radiation Oncology Institute commissioned an independent, comprehensive assessment of research needs for the advancement of radiation oncology care. Methods and Materials: The research needs assessment used a mixed-method, qualitative and quantitative social scientific approach, including structured interviews with diverse stakeholders, focus groups, surveys of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) members, and a prioritization exercise using a modified Delphi technique. Results: Six co-equal priorities were identified: (1) Identify and develop communication strategies to help patients and others better understand radiation therapy; (2) Establish a set of quality indicators for major radiation oncology procedures and evaluate their use in radiation oncology delivery; (3) Identify best practices for the management of radiation toxicity and issues in cancer survivorship; (4) Conduct comparative effectiveness studies related to radiation therapy that consider clinical benefit, toxicity (including quality of life), and other outcomes; (5) Assess the value of radiation therapy; and (6) Develop a radiation oncology registry. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this prioritization exercise is the only comprehensive and methodologically rigorous assessment of research needs in the field of radiation oncology. Broad dissemination of these findings is critical to maximally leverage the impact of this work, particularly because grant funding decisions are often made by committees on which highly specialized disciplines such as radiation oncology are not well represented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)318-322
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume84
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiation Oncology
Needs Assessment
radiation
Research
Radiotherapy
radiation therapy
physical exercise
toxicity
Exercise
Delphi Technique
Practice Management
Focus Groups
Practice Guidelines
Registries
health
Survival Rate
delivery
Communication
Quality of Life
Interviews

Keywords

  • Delphi
  • Needs
  • Priorities
  • Radiation oncology
  • Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

A research agenda for radiation oncology : Results of the Radiation Oncology Institute's comprehensive research needs assessment. / Jagsi, Reshma; Bekelman, Justin E.; Brawley, Otis; Deasy, Joseph O.; Le, Quynh Thu; Michalski, Jeff M.; Movsas, Benjamin; Thomas, Charles R.; Lawton, Colleen A.; Lawrence, Theodore S.; Hahn, Stephen M.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 84, No. 2, 01.10.2012, p. 318-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jagsi, Reshma ; Bekelman, Justin E. ; Brawley, Otis ; Deasy, Joseph O. ; Le, Quynh Thu ; Michalski, Jeff M. ; Movsas, Benjamin ; Thomas, Charles R. ; Lawton, Colleen A. ; Lawrence, Theodore S. ; Hahn, Stephen M. / A research agenda for radiation oncology : Results of the Radiation Oncology Institute's comprehensive research needs assessment. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2012 ; Vol. 84, No. 2. pp. 318-322.
@article{064c69d891d44df49377b0c8d726bb79,
title = "A research agenda for radiation oncology: Results of the Radiation Oncology Institute's comprehensive research needs assessment",
abstract = "Purpose: To promote the rational use of scarce research funding, scholars have developed methods for the systematic identification and prioritization of health research needs. The Radiation Oncology Institute commissioned an independent, comprehensive assessment of research needs for the advancement of radiation oncology care. Methods and Materials: The research needs assessment used a mixed-method, qualitative and quantitative social scientific approach, including structured interviews with diverse stakeholders, focus groups, surveys of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) members, and a prioritization exercise using a modified Delphi technique. Results: Six co-equal priorities were identified: (1) Identify and develop communication strategies to help patients and others better understand radiation therapy; (2) Establish a set of quality indicators for major radiation oncology procedures and evaluate their use in radiation oncology delivery; (3) Identify best practices for the management of radiation toxicity and issues in cancer survivorship; (4) Conduct comparative effectiveness studies related to radiation therapy that consider clinical benefit, toxicity (including quality of life), and other outcomes; (5) Assess the value of radiation therapy; and (6) Develop a radiation oncology registry. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this prioritization exercise is the only comprehensive and methodologically rigorous assessment of research needs in the field of radiation oncology. Broad dissemination of these findings is critical to maximally leverage the impact of this work, particularly because grant funding decisions are often made by committees on which highly specialized disciplines such as radiation oncology are not well represented.",
keywords = "Delphi, Needs, Priorities, Radiation oncology, Research",
author = "Reshma Jagsi and Bekelman, {Justin E.} and Otis Brawley and Deasy, {Joseph O.} and Le, {Quynh Thu} and Michalski, {Jeff M.} and Benjamin Movsas and Thomas, {Charles R.} and Lawton, {Colleen A.} and Lawrence, {Theodore S.} and Hahn, {Stephen M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.076",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "318--322",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A research agenda for radiation oncology

T2 - Results of the Radiation Oncology Institute's comprehensive research needs assessment

AU - Jagsi, Reshma

AU - Bekelman, Justin E.

AU - Brawley, Otis

AU - Deasy, Joseph O.

AU - Le, Quynh Thu

AU - Michalski, Jeff M.

AU - Movsas, Benjamin

AU - Thomas, Charles R.

AU - Lawton, Colleen A.

AU - Lawrence, Theodore S.

AU - Hahn, Stephen M.

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Purpose: To promote the rational use of scarce research funding, scholars have developed methods for the systematic identification and prioritization of health research needs. The Radiation Oncology Institute commissioned an independent, comprehensive assessment of research needs for the advancement of radiation oncology care. Methods and Materials: The research needs assessment used a mixed-method, qualitative and quantitative social scientific approach, including structured interviews with diverse stakeholders, focus groups, surveys of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) members, and a prioritization exercise using a modified Delphi technique. Results: Six co-equal priorities were identified: (1) Identify and develop communication strategies to help patients and others better understand radiation therapy; (2) Establish a set of quality indicators for major radiation oncology procedures and evaluate their use in radiation oncology delivery; (3) Identify best practices for the management of radiation toxicity and issues in cancer survivorship; (4) Conduct comparative effectiveness studies related to radiation therapy that consider clinical benefit, toxicity (including quality of life), and other outcomes; (5) Assess the value of radiation therapy; and (6) Develop a radiation oncology registry. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this prioritization exercise is the only comprehensive and methodologically rigorous assessment of research needs in the field of radiation oncology. Broad dissemination of these findings is critical to maximally leverage the impact of this work, particularly because grant funding decisions are often made by committees on which highly specialized disciplines such as radiation oncology are not well represented.

AB - Purpose: To promote the rational use of scarce research funding, scholars have developed methods for the systematic identification and prioritization of health research needs. The Radiation Oncology Institute commissioned an independent, comprehensive assessment of research needs for the advancement of radiation oncology care. Methods and Materials: The research needs assessment used a mixed-method, qualitative and quantitative social scientific approach, including structured interviews with diverse stakeholders, focus groups, surveys of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) members, and a prioritization exercise using a modified Delphi technique. Results: Six co-equal priorities were identified: (1) Identify and develop communication strategies to help patients and others better understand radiation therapy; (2) Establish a set of quality indicators for major radiation oncology procedures and evaluate their use in radiation oncology delivery; (3) Identify best practices for the management of radiation toxicity and issues in cancer survivorship; (4) Conduct comparative effectiveness studies related to radiation therapy that consider clinical benefit, toxicity (including quality of life), and other outcomes; (5) Assess the value of radiation therapy; and (6) Develop a radiation oncology registry. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this prioritization exercise is the only comprehensive and methodologically rigorous assessment of research needs in the field of radiation oncology. Broad dissemination of these findings is critical to maximally leverage the impact of this work, particularly because grant funding decisions are often made by committees on which highly specialized disciplines such as radiation oncology are not well represented.

KW - Delphi

KW - Needs

KW - Priorities

KW - Radiation oncology

KW - Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865620496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865620496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.076

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.076

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 318

EP - 322

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 2

ER -