A reconsideration of amblyopia screening and stereopsis

Kurt A. Simons, R. D. Reinecke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Traditional screening measures for amblyopia, including visual acuity, the cover test (to detect the frequently associated strabismus), and the 4 diopter prism test have shortcomings when used with 3 to 4 yr old children who are the most important candidates for visual screening. In the present study, a widely used set of stereotests (Titmus Stereo Fly, Circle, and Animal Tests) were administered to 70 patients with known visual dysfunctions to determine if stereopsis testing, in the form of these tests, constituted a feasible alternative as a screening measure. The results indicated that, with the exception of the relatively fine thresholds of the No. 5 (100 arc sec) to No. 9 (40 arc sec) Circle tests these stereotests are not only unreliable in discriminating patients with amblyopia from normals, but may indicate an artifactual stereoscopic capability. Since a previous screening study reported that children in the 3 to 4 yr old range were unable to pass the No. 5 and above Circles targets, it appears that while stereopsis itself may be a pertinent amblyopia screening measure, this particular set of tests is not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)707-713
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume78
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1974
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Depth Perception
Amblyopia
Strabismus
Diptera
Visual Acuity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

A reconsideration of amblyopia screening and stereopsis. / Simons, Kurt A.; Reinecke, R. D.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 78, No. 4, 1974, p. 707-713.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{674b05efce6943eaa88bd7768f485908,
title = "A reconsideration of amblyopia screening and stereopsis",
abstract = "Traditional screening measures for amblyopia, including visual acuity, the cover test (to detect the frequently associated strabismus), and the 4 diopter prism test have shortcomings when used with 3 to 4 yr old children who are the most important candidates for visual screening. In the present study, a widely used set of stereotests (Titmus Stereo Fly, Circle, and Animal Tests) were administered to 70 patients with known visual dysfunctions to determine if stereopsis testing, in the form of these tests, constituted a feasible alternative as a screening measure. The results indicated that, with the exception of the relatively fine thresholds of the No. 5 (100 arc sec) to No. 9 (40 arc sec) Circle tests these stereotests are not only unreliable in discriminating patients with amblyopia from normals, but may indicate an artifactual stereoscopic capability. Since a previous screening study reported that children in the 3 to 4 yr old range were unable to pass the No. 5 and above Circles targets, it appears that while stereopsis itself may be a pertinent amblyopia screening measure, this particular set of tests is not.",
author = "Simons, {Kurt A.} and Reinecke, {R. D.}",
year = "1974",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "707--713",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A reconsideration of amblyopia screening and stereopsis

AU - Simons, Kurt A.

AU - Reinecke, R. D.

PY - 1974

Y1 - 1974

N2 - Traditional screening measures for amblyopia, including visual acuity, the cover test (to detect the frequently associated strabismus), and the 4 diopter prism test have shortcomings when used with 3 to 4 yr old children who are the most important candidates for visual screening. In the present study, a widely used set of stereotests (Titmus Stereo Fly, Circle, and Animal Tests) were administered to 70 patients with known visual dysfunctions to determine if stereopsis testing, in the form of these tests, constituted a feasible alternative as a screening measure. The results indicated that, with the exception of the relatively fine thresholds of the No. 5 (100 arc sec) to No. 9 (40 arc sec) Circle tests these stereotests are not only unreliable in discriminating patients with amblyopia from normals, but may indicate an artifactual stereoscopic capability. Since a previous screening study reported that children in the 3 to 4 yr old range were unable to pass the No. 5 and above Circles targets, it appears that while stereopsis itself may be a pertinent amblyopia screening measure, this particular set of tests is not.

AB - Traditional screening measures for amblyopia, including visual acuity, the cover test (to detect the frequently associated strabismus), and the 4 diopter prism test have shortcomings when used with 3 to 4 yr old children who are the most important candidates for visual screening. In the present study, a widely used set of stereotests (Titmus Stereo Fly, Circle, and Animal Tests) were administered to 70 patients with known visual dysfunctions to determine if stereopsis testing, in the form of these tests, constituted a feasible alternative as a screening measure. The results indicated that, with the exception of the relatively fine thresholds of the No. 5 (100 arc sec) to No. 9 (40 arc sec) Circle tests these stereotests are not only unreliable in discriminating patients with amblyopia from normals, but may indicate an artifactual stereoscopic capability. Since a previous screening study reported that children in the 3 to 4 yr old range were unable to pass the No. 5 and above Circles targets, it appears that while stereopsis itself may be a pertinent amblyopia screening measure, this particular set of tests is not.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016267063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016267063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 4411731

AN - SCOPUS:0016267063

VL - 78

SP - 707

EP - 713

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 4

ER -