TY - JOUR
T1 - A reconsideration of amblyopia screening and stereopsis
AU - Simons, K.
AU - Reinecke, R. D.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the Department of Ophthalmology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York. This study was supported in part by Public Health Service research grant EY-00752 and training grant EY-00044 from the National Eye Institute, and a research grant from the National Society for the Prevention of Blindness, Inc.
PY - 1974
Y1 - 1974
N2 - Traditional screening measures for amblyopia, including visual acuity, the cover test (to detect the frequently associated strabismus), and the 4 diopter prism test have shortcomings when used with 3 to 4 yr old children who are the most important candidates for visual screening. In the present study, a widely used set of stereotests (Titmus Stereo Fly, Circle, and Animal Tests) were administered to 70 patients with known visual dysfunctions to determine if stereopsis testing, in the form of these tests, constituted a feasible alternative as a screening measure. The results indicated that, with the exception of the relatively fine thresholds of the No. 5 (100 arc sec) to No. 9 (40 arc sec) Circle tests these stereotests are not only unreliable in discriminating patients with amblyopia from normals, but may indicate an artifactual stereoscopic capability. Since a previous screening study reported that children in the 3 to 4 yr old range were unable to pass the No. 5 and above Circles targets, it appears that while stereopsis itself may be a pertinent amblyopia screening measure, this particular set of tests is not.
AB - Traditional screening measures for amblyopia, including visual acuity, the cover test (to detect the frequently associated strabismus), and the 4 diopter prism test have shortcomings when used with 3 to 4 yr old children who are the most important candidates for visual screening. In the present study, a widely used set of stereotests (Titmus Stereo Fly, Circle, and Animal Tests) were administered to 70 patients with known visual dysfunctions to determine if stereopsis testing, in the form of these tests, constituted a feasible alternative as a screening measure. The results indicated that, with the exception of the relatively fine thresholds of the No. 5 (100 arc sec) to No. 9 (40 arc sec) Circle tests these stereotests are not only unreliable in discriminating patients with amblyopia from normals, but may indicate an artifactual stereoscopic capability. Since a previous screening study reported that children in the 3 to 4 yr old range were unable to pass the No. 5 and above Circles targets, it appears that while stereopsis itself may be a pertinent amblyopia screening measure, this particular set of tests is not.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016267063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016267063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76310-X
DO - 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76310-X
M3 - Article
C2 - 4411731
AN - SCOPUS:0016267063
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 78
SP - 707
EP - 713
JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology
IS - 4
ER -