A randomized controlled trial of birth simulation for medical students

Christopher C. DeStephano, Betty Chou, Silka Patel, Rebecca Slattery, Nancy A Hueppchen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

CONCLUSION: MamaNatalie is as effective as Noelle in training medical students how to perform a SVD and may be a useful, lower-cost alternative in teaching labor and delivery skills to novice learners. Because birth simulation interventions involve both a simulation model and facilitator, research is required to further determine the effect of human interaction on learning outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Prior to the obstetrics-gynecology clerkship, students were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The MamaNatalie group (MG) completed 45 minutes of SVD simulation using an obstetrical abdominal-pelvic model worn by an obstetrics-gynecology faculty member. The Noelle group (NG) completed 45 minutes of SVD simulation using a high-fidelity, computer-controlled mannequin facilitated by an obstetrics-gynecology faculty member. The primary outcome was student performance during his or her first SVD as rated by supervising preceptors. Surveys were also completed by students on confidence in performing steps of a SVD (secondary outcome).

RESULTS: One hundred ten medical students (95% of those eligible) participated in this research study. The final postclerkship survey was completed by 93 students (85% follow-up rate). There were no significant differences in performance of SVD steps between MG and NG students as rated by preceptors. The SVD step with the least involvement by students was controlling the head (20.5% in MG, 23.3% in NG performed step with hands-off supervision). Delivery of the placenta was the SVD step with the most involvement (65.9% in MG, 52.3% in NG performed step with hands-off supervision). Baseline presimulation confidence levels were similar between MG and NG. On the immediate postsimulation survey of confidence, MG students were significantly more confident in their ability to deliver the abdomen and legs and perform fundal massage with hands-off supervision (P <.05) than NG students. Following the clerkship, MG students were significantly more confident in their ability to control the head and deliver the abdomen and legs (P <.05) than NG students.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a high-fidelity birth simulator (Noelle; Gaumard Scientific, Coral Gables, FL) compared with a lower-cost, low-tech, birth simulator (MamaNatalie; Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) in teaching medical students how to perform a spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD).

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume213
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Randomized Controlled Trials
Parturition
Students
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Hand
Abdomen
Leg
Teaching
Head
Manikins
Costs and Cost Analysis
Anthozoa
Aptitude
Massage
Norway
Research
Placenta
Learning

Keywords

  • medical student education
  • obstetric simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A randomized controlled trial of birth simulation for medical students. / DeStephano, Christopher C.; Chou, Betty; Patel, Silka; Slattery, Rebecca; Hueppchen, Nancy A.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 213, No. 1, 01.07.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3cc260caa0c7441b9abf0ca8a4260b53,
title = "A randomized controlled trial of birth simulation for medical students",
abstract = "CONCLUSION: MamaNatalie is as effective as Noelle in training medical students how to perform a SVD and may be a useful, lower-cost alternative in teaching labor and delivery skills to novice learners. Because birth simulation interventions involve both a simulation model and facilitator, research is required to further determine the effect of human interaction on learning outcomes.STUDY DESIGN: Prior to the obstetrics-gynecology clerkship, students were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The MamaNatalie group (MG) completed 45 minutes of SVD simulation using an obstetrical abdominal-pelvic model worn by an obstetrics-gynecology faculty member. The Noelle group (NG) completed 45 minutes of SVD simulation using a high-fidelity, computer-controlled mannequin facilitated by an obstetrics-gynecology faculty member. The primary outcome was student performance during his or her first SVD as rated by supervising preceptors. Surveys were also completed by students on confidence in performing steps of a SVD (secondary outcome).RESULTS: One hundred ten medical students (95{\%} of those eligible) participated in this research study. The final postclerkship survey was completed by 93 students (85{\%} follow-up rate). There were no significant differences in performance of SVD steps between MG and NG students as rated by preceptors. The SVD step with the least involvement by students was controlling the head (20.5{\%} in MG, 23.3{\%} in NG performed step with hands-off supervision). Delivery of the placenta was the SVD step with the most involvement (65.9{\%} in MG, 52.3{\%} in NG performed step with hands-off supervision). Baseline presimulation confidence levels were similar between MG and NG. On the immediate postsimulation survey of confidence, MG students were significantly more confident in their ability to deliver the abdomen and legs and perform fundal massage with hands-off supervision (P <.05) than NG students. Following the clerkship, MG students were significantly more confident in their ability to control the head and deliver the abdomen and legs (P <.05) than NG students.OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a high-fidelity birth simulator (Noelle; Gaumard Scientific, Coral Gables, FL) compared with a lower-cost, low-tech, birth simulator (MamaNatalie; Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) in teaching medical students how to perform a spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD).",
keywords = "medical student education, obstetric simulation",
author = "DeStephano, {Christopher C.} and Betty Chou and Silka Patel and Rebecca Slattery and Hueppchen, {Nancy A}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "213",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized controlled trial of birth simulation for medical students

AU - DeStephano, Christopher C.

AU - Chou, Betty

AU - Patel, Silka

AU - Slattery, Rebecca

AU - Hueppchen, Nancy A

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - CONCLUSION: MamaNatalie is as effective as Noelle in training medical students how to perform a SVD and may be a useful, lower-cost alternative in teaching labor and delivery skills to novice learners. Because birth simulation interventions involve both a simulation model and facilitator, research is required to further determine the effect of human interaction on learning outcomes.STUDY DESIGN: Prior to the obstetrics-gynecology clerkship, students were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The MamaNatalie group (MG) completed 45 minutes of SVD simulation using an obstetrical abdominal-pelvic model worn by an obstetrics-gynecology faculty member. The Noelle group (NG) completed 45 minutes of SVD simulation using a high-fidelity, computer-controlled mannequin facilitated by an obstetrics-gynecology faculty member. The primary outcome was student performance during his or her first SVD as rated by supervising preceptors. Surveys were also completed by students on confidence in performing steps of a SVD (secondary outcome).RESULTS: One hundred ten medical students (95% of those eligible) participated in this research study. The final postclerkship survey was completed by 93 students (85% follow-up rate). There were no significant differences in performance of SVD steps between MG and NG students as rated by preceptors. The SVD step with the least involvement by students was controlling the head (20.5% in MG, 23.3% in NG performed step with hands-off supervision). Delivery of the placenta was the SVD step with the most involvement (65.9% in MG, 52.3% in NG performed step with hands-off supervision). Baseline presimulation confidence levels were similar between MG and NG. On the immediate postsimulation survey of confidence, MG students were significantly more confident in their ability to deliver the abdomen and legs and perform fundal massage with hands-off supervision (P <.05) than NG students. Following the clerkship, MG students were significantly more confident in their ability to control the head and deliver the abdomen and legs (P <.05) than NG students.OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a high-fidelity birth simulator (Noelle; Gaumard Scientific, Coral Gables, FL) compared with a lower-cost, low-tech, birth simulator (MamaNatalie; Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) in teaching medical students how to perform a spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD).

AB - CONCLUSION: MamaNatalie is as effective as Noelle in training medical students how to perform a SVD and may be a useful, lower-cost alternative in teaching labor and delivery skills to novice learners. Because birth simulation interventions involve both a simulation model and facilitator, research is required to further determine the effect of human interaction on learning outcomes.STUDY DESIGN: Prior to the obstetrics-gynecology clerkship, students were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The MamaNatalie group (MG) completed 45 minutes of SVD simulation using an obstetrical abdominal-pelvic model worn by an obstetrics-gynecology faculty member. The Noelle group (NG) completed 45 minutes of SVD simulation using a high-fidelity, computer-controlled mannequin facilitated by an obstetrics-gynecology faculty member. The primary outcome was student performance during his or her first SVD as rated by supervising preceptors. Surveys were also completed by students on confidence in performing steps of a SVD (secondary outcome).RESULTS: One hundred ten medical students (95% of those eligible) participated in this research study. The final postclerkship survey was completed by 93 students (85% follow-up rate). There were no significant differences in performance of SVD steps between MG and NG students as rated by preceptors. The SVD step with the least involvement by students was controlling the head (20.5% in MG, 23.3% in NG performed step with hands-off supervision). Delivery of the placenta was the SVD step with the most involvement (65.9% in MG, 52.3% in NG performed step with hands-off supervision). Baseline presimulation confidence levels were similar between MG and NG. On the immediate postsimulation survey of confidence, MG students were significantly more confident in their ability to deliver the abdomen and legs and perform fundal massage with hands-off supervision (P <.05) than NG students. Following the clerkship, MG students were significantly more confident in their ability to control the head and deliver the abdomen and legs (P <.05) than NG students.OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a high-fidelity birth simulator (Noelle; Gaumard Scientific, Coral Gables, FL) compared with a lower-cost, low-tech, birth simulator (MamaNatalie; Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) in teaching medical students how to perform a spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD).

KW - medical student education

KW - obstetric simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941552439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941552439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.024

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 25772212

AN - SCOPUS:84937513561

VL - 213

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 1

ER -