A randomized cohort controlled trial to compare intern sign-out training interventions

Soo Hoon Lee, Christopher Terndrup, Phillip Phan, Sandra E. Zaeh, Kwame Atsina, Nicole Minkove, Alexander Billioux, Souvik Chatterjee, Idoreyin Montague, Bennett Clark, Andrew Hughes, Sanjay Virendra Desai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have investigated the efficacy of specific sign-out protocols (such as the illness severity, patient summary, action list, situation awareness and contingency planning, and synthesis by reviewer [I-PASS] bundle), the implementation of a bundle can be time consuming and costly. We compared 4 sign-out training pedagogies on sign-out quality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate training interventions that best enhance multidimensional sign-out quality measured by information exchange, task accountability, and personal responsibility. INTERVENTION: Four general internal medicine firms were randomly assigned into 1 of the following 4 training interventions: didactics (control), I-PASS, policy mandate on task accountability, and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA). SETTING: First-year interns at a large, Mid-Atlantic internal medicine residency program. MEASUREMENTS: Eight trained observers examined 10 days each in the pre-and postintervention periods for each firm using a standardized sign-out checklist. RESULTS: Pre-and postintervention differences showed significant improvements in the transfer of patient information, task accountability, and personal responsibility for the I-PASS, policy mandate, and PDSA groups, respectively, in line with their respective training foci. Compared to the control, I-PASS reported the best improvements in sign-out quality, although there was room to improve in task accountability and responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: Different training emphases improved different dimensions of sign-out quality. A combination of training pedagogies is likely to yield optimal results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)979-983
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Hospital Medicine
Volume12
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Social Responsibility
Randomized Controlled Trials
Internal Medicine
Patient Transfer
Internship and Residency
Checklist

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Fundamentals and skills
  • Health Policy
  • Care Planning
  • Assessment and Diagnosis

Cite this

A randomized cohort controlled trial to compare intern sign-out training interventions. / Lee, Soo Hoon; Terndrup, Christopher; Phan, Phillip; Zaeh, Sandra E.; Atsina, Kwame; Minkove, Nicole; Billioux, Alexander; Chatterjee, Souvik; Montague, Idoreyin; Clark, Bennett; Hughes, Andrew; Desai, Sanjay Virendra.

In: Journal of Hospital Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 12, 01.12.2017, p. 979-983.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, SH, Terndrup, C, Phan, P, Zaeh, SE, Atsina, K, Minkove, N, Billioux, A, Chatterjee, S, Montague, I, Clark, B, Hughes, A & Desai, SV 2017, 'A randomized cohort controlled trial to compare intern sign-out training interventions', Journal of Hospital Medicine, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 979-983. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.2843
Lee, Soo Hoon ; Terndrup, Christopher ; Phan, Phillip ; Zaeh, Sandra E. ; Atsina, Kwame ; Minkove, Nicole ; Billioux, Alexander ; Chatterjee, Souvik ; Montague, Idoreyin ; Clark, Bennett ; Hughes, Andrew ; Desai, Sanjay Virendra. / A randomized cohort controlled trial to compare intern sign-out training interventions. In: Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 12. pp. 979-983.
@article{6c46eb2e2cd1414c9dfeecb7b360713d,
title = "A randomized cohort controlled trial to compare intern sign-out training interventions",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have investigated the efficacy of specific sign-out protocols (such as the illness severity, patient summary, action list, situation awareness and contingency planning, and synthesis by reviewer [I-PASS] bundle), the implementation of a bundle can be time consuming and costly. We compared 4 sign-out training pedagogies on sign-out quality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate training interventions that best enhance multidimensional sign-out quality measured by information exchange, task accountability, and personal responsibility. INTERVENTION: Four general internal medicine firms were randomly assigned into 1 of the following 4 training interventions: didactics (control), I-PASS, policy mandate on task accountability, and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA). SETTING: First-year interns at a large, Mid-Atlantic internal medicine residency program. MEASUREMENTS: Eight trained observers examined 10 days each in the pre-and postintervention periods for each firm using a standardized sign-out checklist. RESULTS: Pre-and postintervention differences showed significant improvements in the transfer of patient information, task accountability, and personal responsibility for the I-PASS, policy mandate, and PDSA groups, respectively, in line with their respective training foci. Compared to the control, I-PASS reported the best improvements in sign-out quality, although there was room to improve in task accountability and responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: Different training emphases improved different dimensions of sign-out quality. A combination of training pedagogies is likely to yield optimal results.",
author = "Lee, {Soo Hoon} and Christopher Terndrup and Phillip Phan and Zaeh, {Sandra E.} and Kwame Atsina and Nicole Minkove and Alexander Billioux and Souvik Chatterjee and Idoreyin Montague and Bennett Clark and Andrew Hughes and Desai, {Sanjay Virendra}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.12788/jhm.2843",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "979--983",
journal = "Journal of hospital medicine (Online)",
issn = "1553-5606",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized cohort controlled trial to compare intern sign-out training interventions

AU - Lee, Soo Hoon

AU - Terndrup, Christopher

AU - Phan, Phillip

AU - Zaeh, Sandra E.

AU - Atsina, Kwame

AU - Minkove, Nicole

AU - Billioux, Alexander

AU - Chatterjee, Souvik

AU - Montague, Idoreyin

AU - Clark, Bennett

AU - Hughes, Andrew

AU - Desai, Sanjay Virendra

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have investigated the efficacy of specific sign-out protocols (such as the illness severity, patient summary, action list, situation awareness and contingency planning, and synthesis by reviewer [I-PASS] bundle), the implementation of a bundle can be time consuming and costly. We compared 4 sign-out training pedagogies on sign-out quality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate training interventions that best enhance multidimensional sign-out quality measured by information exchange, task accountability, and personal responsibility. INTERVENTION: Four general internal medicine firms were randomly assigned into 1 of the following 4 training interventions: didactics (control), I-PASS, policy mandate on task accountability, and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA). SETTING: First-year interns at a large, Mid-Atlantic internal medicine residency program. MEASUREMENTS: Eight trained observers examined 10 days each in the pre-and postintervention periods for each firm using a standardized sign-out checklist. RESULTS: Pre-and postintervention differences showed significant improvements in the transfer of patient information, task accountability, and personal responsibility for the I-PASS, policy mandate, and PDSA groups, respectively, in line with their respective training foci. Compared to the control, I-PASS reported the best improvements in sign-out quality, although there was room to improve in task accountability and responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: Different training emphases improved different dimensions of sign-out quality. A combination of training pedagogies is likely to yield optimal results.

AB - BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have investigated the efficacy of specific sign-out protocols (such as the illness severity, patient summary, action list, situation awareness and contingency planning, and synthesis by reviewer [I-PASS] bundle), the implementation of a bundle can be time consuming and costly. We compared 4 sign-out training pedagogies on sign-out quality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate training interventions that best enhance multidimensional sign-out quality measured by information exchange, task accountability, and personal responsibility. INTERVENTION: Four general internal medicine firms were randomly assigned into 1 of the following 4 training interventions: didactics (control), I-PASS, policy mandate on task accountability, and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA). SETTING: First-year interns at a large, Mid-Atlantic internal medicine residency program. MEASUREMENTS: Eight trained observers examined 10 days each in the pre-and postintervention periods for each firm using a standardized sign-out checklist. RESULTS: Pre-and postintervention differences showed significant improvements in the transfer of patient information, task accountability, and personal responsibility for the I-PASS, policy mandate, and PDSA groups, respectively, in line with their respective training foci. Compared to the control, I-PASS reported the best improvements in sign-out quality, although there was room to improve in task accountability and responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: Different training emphases improved different dimensions of sign-out quality. A combination of training pedagogies is likely to yield optimal results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037833604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037833604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.12788/jhm.2843

DO - 10.12788/jhm.2843

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 979

EP - 983

JO - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

JF - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

SN - 1553-5606

IS - 12

ER -