A quantitative study of the bias in estimating the treatment effect caused by omitting a balanced covariate in survival models

Claude Chastang, David Byar, Steven Piantadosi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper discusses the quantitative aspects of bias in estimates of treatment effect in survival models when there is failure to adjust on balanced prognostic variables. A simple numerical example of this bias is given along with approximate formulae for its calculation in the multiplicative exponential survival model. The accuracy of the formulae is checked by simulation. In addition, approximate calculations and simulations of power loss and the effects of omitting more than one prognostic covariate are presented. The Weibull and Cox models are also examined using simulation. Study of this bias is pertinent to much applied work, and shows that the effect of omitting balanced covariates can be modest unless the variables are strongly prognostic or many in number. This work emphasizes the need for thorough comparisons of adjusted and unadjusted analyses for sensible interpretation of treatment effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1243-1255
Number of pages13
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume7
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1988
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adjustment
  • Bias
  • Exponential survival model
  • Survival models
  • Weibull model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Statistics and Probability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A quantitative study of the bias in estimating the treatment effect caused by omitting a balanced covariate in survival models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this