Abstract
Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) has been subject to numerous definition and classification changes, which has contributed to difficulties in reliable measurement of the disorder. Consequently, OCPD measures have yielded poor validity and inconsistent prevalence estimates. Reliable and valid measures of OCPD are needed. The aim of the current study was to examine the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Pathological Obsessive Compulsive Personality Scale (POPS). Participants (N = 571 undergraduates) completed a series of self-report measures online, including the POPS. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare the fit of unidimensional, five factor, and bifactor models of the POPS. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed in relation to other personality dimensions. A bifactor model provided the best fit to the data, indicating that the total POPS scale and four subscales can be scored to obtain reliable indicators of OCPD. The POPS was most strongly associated with a disorder-specific measure of OCPD, however there were also positive associations with theoretically disparate constructs, thus further research is needed to clarify validity of the scale.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 284-293 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Personality Assessment |
| Volume | 101 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 4 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- bifactor
- obsessive-compulsive personality
- psychometrics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Cite this
A Psychometric Examination of the Pathological Obsessive Compulsive Personality Scale (POPS) : Initial Study in an Undergraduate Sample. / Sadri, Shalane K.; McEvoy, Peter M.; Pinto, Anthony; Anderson, Rebecca A.; Egan, Sarah J.
In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 101, No. 3, 04.05.2019, p. 284-293.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A Psychometric Examination of the Pathological Obsessive Compulsive Personality Scale (POPS)
T2 - Initial Study in an Undergraduate Sample
AU - Sadri, Shalane K.
AU - McEvoy, Peter M.
AU - Pinto, Anthony
AU - Anderson, Rebecca A.
AU - Egan, Sarah J.
PY - 2019/5/4
Y1 - 2019/5/4
N2 - Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) has been subject to numerous definition and classification changes, which has contributed to difficulties in reliable measurement of the disorder. Consequently, OCPD measures have yielded poor validity and inconsistent prevalence estimates. Reliable and valid measures of OCPD are needed. The aim of the current study was to examine the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Pathological Obsessive Compulsive Personality Scale (POPS). Participants (N = 571 undergraduates) completed a series of self-report measures online, including the POPS. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare the fit of unidimensional, five factor, and bifactor models of the POPS. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed in relation to other personality dimensions. A bifactor model provided the best fit to the data, indicating that the total POPS scale and four subscales can be scored to obtain reliable indicators of OCPD. The POPS was most strongly associated with a disorder-specific measure of OCPD, however there were also positive associations with theoretically disparate constructs, thus further research is needed to clarify validity of the scale.
AB - Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) has been subject to numerous definition and classification changes, which has contributed to difficulties in reliable measurement of the disorder. Consequently, OCPD measures have yielded poor validity and inconsistent prevalence estimates. Reliable and valid measures of OCPD are needed. The aim of the current study was to examine the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Pathological Obsessive Compulsive Personality Scale (POPS). Participants (N = 571 undergraduates) completed a series of self-report measures online, including the POPS. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare the fit of unidimensional, five factor, and bifactor models of the POPS. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed in relation to other personality dimensions. A bifactor model provided the best fit to the data, indicating that the total POPS scale and four subscales can be scored to obtain reliable indicators of OCPD. The POPS was most strongly associated with a disorder-specific measure of OCPD, however there were also positive associations with theoretically disparate constructs, thus further research is needed to clarify validity of the scale.
KW - bifactor
KW - obsessive-compulsive personality
KW - psychometrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042946133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042946133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00223891.2018.1428983
DO - 10.1080/00223891.2018.1428983
M3 - Article
C2 - 29494778
AN - SCOPUS:85042946133
VL - 101
SP - 284
EP - 293
JO - Journal of Personality Assessment
JF - Journal of Personality Assessment
SN - 0022-3891
IS - 3
ER -