A practical framework for patient care teams to prospectively identify and mitigate clinical hazards

Kurt R. Herzer, Jose M. Rodriguez-Paz, Peter A. Doyle, Paul W. Flint, David Feller-Kopman, Joseph Herman, Robert E. Bristow, Renee Cover, Peter J. Pronovost, Lynette J Mark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: One of the greatest challenges facing both practitioners and risk managers is the identification of previously unknown clinical hazards and defects. With the rapid proliferation of new health care services, unknown hazards may propagate as new therapies are integrated into the existing health care system. The main goal of risk analysis is to make these hazards visible by proactively searching and probing the system. Yet, a comprehensive approach by which to safely integrate new therapies into the existing clinical environment has yet to be clearly articulated. Patient care teams can use the proposed framework when introducing new therapies. A Practical Framework: The framework includes a background investigation and literature search; an in situ simulation (in the actual clinical setting used for patients); a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to determine the severity, probability, and risk of the potential hazards; and a multi-disciplinary protocol and safety checklist to standardize practice and ensure provider accountability. Case Examples: Application of this framework to three operative scenarios - intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and an interventional pulmonology program - demonstrates its flexibility. Its use prospectively identified and mitigated 20 IORT, 5 HIPEC, and 18 interventional pulmonology hazards/defects. Subsequent patient cases were largely uneventful. All cases and patient safety reporting systems are monitored to identify any new defects in an effort to continuously improve patient care. Conclusion: The use of a comprehensive framework to identify and mitigate hazards in an on-site simulated environment promotes safer care for target patient populations; results in familiarity with procedures, amelioration of staff concerns, and standardization of practice; and facilitates teamwork and communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-81
Number of pages10
JournalJoint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
Volume35
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Patient Care Team
Pulmonary Medicine
Patient Care
Radiotherapy
Delivery of Health Care
Drug Therapy
Health Services Needs and Demand
Social Responsibility
Patient Safety
Checklist
Health Services
Therapeutics
Communication
Safety
Practice (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

A practical framework for patient care teams to prospectively identify and mitigate clinical hazards. / Herzer, Kurt R.; Rodriguez-Paz, Jose M.; Doyle, Peter A.; Flint, Paul W.; Feller-Kopman, David; Herman, Joseph; Bristow, Robert E.; Cover, Renee; Pronovost, Peter J.; Mark, Lynette J.

In: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Vol. 35, No. 2, 02.2009, p. 72-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herzer, KR, Rodriguez-Paz, JM, Doyle, PA, Flint, PW, Feller-Kopman, D, Herman, J, Bristow, RE, Cover, R, Pronovost, PJ & Mark, LJ 2009, 'A practical framework for patient care teams to prospectively identify and mitigate clinical hazards', Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 72-81.
Herzer, Kurt R. ; Rodriguez-Paz, Jose M. ; Doyle, Peter A. ; Flint, Paul W. ; Feller-Kopman, David ; Herman, Joseph ; Bristow, Robert E. ; Cover, Renee ; Pronovost, Peter J. ; Mark, Lynette J. / A practical framework for patient care teams to prospectively identify and mitigate clinical hazards. In: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2009 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 72-81.
@article{117f4e73948444179b7fb5133157db3d,
title = "A practical framework for patient care teams to prospectively identify and mitigate clinical hazards",
abstract = "Background: One of the greatest challenges facing both practitioners and risk managers is the identification of previously unknown clinical hazards and defects. With the rapid proliferation of new health care services, unknown hazards may propagate as new therapies are integrated into the existing health care system. The main goal of risk analysis is to make these hazards visible by proactively searching and probing the system. Yet, a comprehensive approach by which to safely integrate new therapies into the existing clinical environment has yet to be clearly articulated. Patient care teams can use the proposed framework when introducing new therapies. A Practical Framework: The framework includes a background investigation and literature search; an in situ simulation (in the actual clinical setting used for patients); a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to determine the severity, probability, and risk of the potential hazards; and a multi-disciplinary protocol and safety checklist to standardize practice and ensure provider accountability. Case Examples: Application of this framework to three operative scenarios - intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and an interventional pulmonology program - demonstrates its flexibility. Its use prospectively identified and mitigated 20 IORT, 5 HIPEC, and 18 interventional pulmonology hazards/defects. Subsequent patient cases were largely uneventful. All cases and patient safety reporting systems are monitored to identify any new defects in an effort to continuously improve patient care. Conclusion: The use of a comprehensive framework to identify and mitigate hazards in an on-site simulated environment promotes safer care for target patient populations; results in familiarity with procedures, amelioration of staff concerns, and standardization of practice; and facilitates teamwork and communication.",
author = "Herzer, {Kurt R.} and Rodriguez-Paz, {Jose M.} and Doyle, {Peter A.} and Flint, {Paul W.} and David Feller-Kopman and Joseph Herman and Bristow, {Robert E.} and Renee Cover and Pronovost, {Peter J.} and Mark, {Lynette J}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "72--81",
journal = "Nature Clinical Practice Oncology",
issn = "1759-4774",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A practical framework for patient care teams to prospectively identify and mitigate clinical hazards

AU - Herzer, Kurt R.

AU - Rodriguez-Paz, Jose M.

AU - Doyle, Peter A.

AU - Flint, Paul W.

AU - Feller-Kopman, David

AU - Herman, Joseph

AU - Bristow, Robert E.

AU - Cover, Renee

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

AU - Mark, Lynette J

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Background: One of the greatest challenges facing both practitioners and risk managers is the identification of previously unknown clinical hazards and defects. With the rapid proliferation of new health care services, unknown hazards may propagate as new therapies are integrated into the existing health care system. The main goal of risk analysis is to make these hazards visible by proactively searching and probing the system. Yet, a comprehensive approach by which to safely integrate new therapies into the existing clinical environment has yet to be clearly articulated. Patient care teams can use the proposed framework when introducing new therapies. A Practical Framework: The framework includes a background investigation and literature search; an in situ simulation (in the actual clinical setting used for patients); a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to determine the severity, probability, and risk of the potential hazards; and a multi-disciplinary protocol and safety checklist to standardize practice and ensure provider accountability. Case Examples: Application of this framework to three operative scenarios - intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and an interventional pulmonology program - demonstrates its flexibility. Its use prospectively identified and mitigated 20 IORT, 5 HIPEC, and 18 interventional pulmonology hazards/defects. Subsequent patient cases were largely uneventful. All cases and patient safety reporting systems are monitored to identify any new defects in an effort to continuously improve patient care. Conclusion: The use of a comprehensive framework to identify and mitigate hazards in an on-site simulated environment promotes safer care for target patient populations; results in familiarity with procedures, amelioration of staff concerns, and standardization of practice; and facilitates teamwork and communication.

AB - Background: One of the greatest challenges facing both practitioners and risk managers is the identification of previously unknown clinical hazards and defects. With the rapid proliferation of new health care services, unknown hazards may propagate as new therapies are integrated into the existing health care system. The main goal of risk analysis is to make these hazards visible by proactively searching and probing the system. Yet, a comprehensive approach by which to safely integrate new therapies into the existing clinical environment has yet to be clearly articulated. Patient care teams can use the proposed framework when introducing new therapies. A Practical Framework: The framework includes a background investigation and literature search; an in situ simulation (in the actual clinical setting used for patients); a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to determine the severity, probability, and risk of the potential hazards; and a multi-disciplinary protocol and safety checklist to standardize practice and ensure provider accountability. Case Examples: Application of this framework to three operative scenarios - intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and an interventional pulmonology program - demonstrates its flexibility. Its use prospectively identified and mitigated 20 IORT, 5 HIPEC, and 18 interventional pulmonology hazards/defects. Subsequent patient cases were largely uneventful. All cases and patient safety reporting systems are monitored to identify any new defects in an effort to continuously improve patient care. Conclusion: The use of a comprehensive framework to identify and mitigate hazards in an on-site simulated environment promotes safer care for target patient populations; results in familiarity with procedures, amelioration of staff concerns, and standardization of practice; and facilitates teamwork and communication.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650421648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650421648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19241727

AN - SCOPUS:78650421648

VL - 35

SP - 72

EP - 81

JO - Nature Clinical Practice Oncology

JF - Nature Clinical Practice Oncology

SN - 1759-4774

IS - 2

ER -