A practical, automated quality assurance method for measuring spatial resolution in PET

Martin Lodge, Arman Rahmim, Richard L. Wahl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The use of different scanners, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction algorithms has been identified as a problem that limits the use of PET in multicenter trials. The aim of this project was to aid standardization of data collection by developing a quality assurance method for measuring the spatial resolution achieved with clinical imaging protocols. Methods: A commercially available 68Ge cylinder phantom (diameter, 20 cm) with a uniform activity concentration was positioned in the center of the PET field of view, and an image was acquired using typical clinical parameters. Spatial resolution was measured by artificially generating an object function (O)with uniform activitywithin a 20-cm-diameter cylinder, assuming no noise and perfect spatial resolution, centered on the original image (I); dividing F[I] by F[O], where F indicates a 2-dimensional Fourier transform, to produce a modulation transfer function; and taking the inverse Fourier transform of the modulation transfer function to produce a point-spread function in image space. The method was validated using data acquired on 4 different commercial PET systems. Results: Spatial resolution on the Discovery LS was measured at 5.75 ± 0.58 mm, compared with 5.54 ± 0.19mm from separate point source measurements. Variability of the resolution measurements differed between scanners and protocols, but the typical SD was approximately 0.15 mm when iterative reconstruction was used. The potential for predicting resolution recovery coefficients for small objects was also demonstrated. Conclusion: The proposed method does not require elaborate phantom preparation and is practical to perform, and data analysis is fully automated. This approach is useful for evaluating clinical reconstruction protocols across varying scanners and reconstruction algorithms and should greatly aid standardization of data collection between centers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1307-1314
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume50
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2009

Fingerprint

Fourier Analysis
Clinical Protocols
Multicenter Studies
Noise

Keywords

  • Multicenter trials
  • PET
  • Quality assurance
  • Spatial resolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

A practical, automated quality assurance method for measuring spatial resolution in PET. / Lodge, Martin; Rahmim, Arman; Wahl, Richard L.

In: Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 50, No. 8, 01.08.2009, p. 1307-1314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{af34286d0a7e43dfba2926e55c37140f,
title = "A practical, automated quality assurance method for measuring spatial resolution in PET",
abstract = "The use of different scanners, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction algorithms has been identified as a problem that limits the use of PET in multicenter trials. The aim of this project was to aid standardization of data collection by developing a quality assurance method for measuring the spatial resolution achieved with clinical imaging protocols. Methods: A commercially available 68Ge cylinder phantom (diameter, 20 cm) with a uniform activity concentration was positioned in the center of the PET field of view, and an image was acquired using typical clinical parameters. Spatial resolution was measured by artificially generating an object function (O)with uniform activitywithin a 20-cm-diameter cylinder, assuming no noise and perfect spatial resolution, centered on the original image (I); dividing F[I] by F[O], where F indicates a 2-dimensional Fourier transform, to produce a modulation transfer function; and taking the inverse Fourier transform of the modulation transfer function to produce a point-spread function in image space. The method was validated using data acquired on 4 different commercial PET systems. Results: Spatial resolution on the Discovery LS was measured at 5.75 ± 0.58 mm, compared with 5.54 ± 0.19mm from separate point source measurements. Variability of the resolution measurements differed between scanners and protocols, but the typical SD was approximately 0.15 mm when iterative reconstruction was used. The potential for predicting resolution recovery coefficients for small objects was also demonstrated. Conclusion: The proposed method does not require elaborate phantom preparation and is practical to perform, and data analysis is fully automated. This approach is useful for evaluating clinical reconstruction protocols across varying scanners and reconstruction algorithms and should greatly aid standardization of data collection between centers.",
keywords = "Multicenter trials, PET, Quality assurance, Spatial resolution",
author = "Martin Lodge and Arman Rahmim and Wahl, {Richard L.}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2967/jnumed.108.060079",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "1307--1314",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Medicine",
issn = "0161-5505",
publisher = "Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A practical, automated quality assurance method for measuring spatial resolution in PET

AU - Lodge, Martin

AU - Rahmim, Arman

AU - Wahl, Richard L.

PY - 2009/8/1

Y1 - 2009/8/1

N2 - The use of different scanners, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction algorithms has been identified as a problem that limits the use of PET in multicenter trials. The aim of this project was to aid standardization of data collection by developing a quality assurance method for measuring the spatial resolution achieved with clinical imaging protocols. Methods: A commercially available 68Ge cylinder phantom (diameter, 20 cm) with a uniform activity concentration was positioned in the center of the PET field of view, and an image was acquired using typical clinical parameters. Spatial resolution was measured by artificially generating an object function (O)with uniform activitywithin a 20-cm-diameter cylinder, assuming no noise and perfect spatial resolution, centered on the original image (I); dividing F[I] by F[O], where F indicates a 2-dimensional Fourier transform, to produce a modulation transfer function; and taking the inverse Fourier transform of the modulation transfer function to produce a point-spread function in image space. The method was validated using data acquired on 4 different commercial PET systems. Results: Spatial resolution on the Discovery LS was measured at 5.75 ± 0.58 mm, compared with 5.54 ± 0.19mm from separate point source measurements. Variability of the resolution measurements differed between scanners and protocols, but the typical SD was approximately 0.15 mm when iterative reconstruction was used. The potential for predicting resolution recovery coefficients for small objects was also demonstrated. Conclusion: The proposed method does not require elaborate phantom preparation and is practical to perform, and data analysis is fully automated. This approach is useful for evaluating clinical reconstruction protocols across varying scanners and reconstruction algorithms and should greatly aid standardization of data collection between centers.

AB - The use of different scanners, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction algorithms has been identified as a problem that limits the use of PET in multicenter trials. The aim of this project was to aid standardization of data collection by developing a quality assurance method for measuring the spatial resolution achieved with clinical imaging protocols. Methods: A commercially available 68Ge cylinder phantom (diameter, 20 cm) with a uniform activity concentration was positioned in the center of the PET field of view, and an image was acquired using typical clinical parameters. Spatial resolution was measured by artificially generating an object function (O)with uniform activitywithin a 20-cm-diameter cylinder, assuming no noise and perfect spatial resolution, centered on the original image (I); dividing F[I] by F[O], where F indicates a 2-dimensional Fourier transform, to produce a modulation transfer function; and taking the inverse Fourier transform of the modulation transfer function to produce a point-spread function in image space. The method was validated using data acquired on 4 different commercial PET systems. Results: Spatial resolution on the Discovery LS was measured at 5.75 ± 0.58 mm, compared with 5.54 ± 0.19mm from separate point source measurements. Variability of the resolution measurements differed between scanners and protocols, but the typical SD was approximately 0.15 mm when iterative reconstruction was used. The potential for predicting resolution recovery coefficients for small objects was also demonstrated. Conclusion: The proposed method does not require elaborate phantom preparation and is practical to perform, and data analysis is fully automated. This approach is useful for evaluating clinical reconstruction protocols across varying scanners and reconstruction algorithms and should greatly aid standardization of data collection between centers.

KW - Multicenter trials

KW - PET

KW - Quality assurance

KW - Spatial resolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68249153258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68249153258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2967/jnumed.108.060079

DO - 10.2967/jnumed.108.060079

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 1307

EP - 1314

JO - Journal of Nuclear Medicine

JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine

SN - 0161-5505

IS - 8

ER -