A pilot test of the acceptability and efficacy of narrative and non-narrative health education materials in a low health literacy population

Meghan Moran, Lauren B. Frank, Joyee S. Chatterjee, Sheila T. Murphy, Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Abstract: Although entertainment-education narratives are increasingly being used to communicate health information to a diversity of populations, there is limited evidence examining the use of narrative health education videos in low compared with adequate health literacy populations. There are also very few studies directly comparing narrative materials to more traditional, non-narrative materials. Because individuals with low health literacy are less likely than those with adequate health literacy to benefit from health communication interventions, it is especially important to develop an evidence base supporting the use of narrative health education materials in low-literacy populations. This study extends knowledge on the use of narrative health education materials in populations with low health literacy by conducting a randomized trial comparing the acceptability and efficacy (knowledge gain) of two fact-equivalent films, one in a narrative and one in a non-narrative format, on individuals with adequate and low health literacy. This study finds that while both films were well-accepted and produced knowledge gains, the narrative film was more effective in this regard. This effect occurred regardless of health literacy level, indicating that narrative health communication materials are appropriate for individuals with low health literacy and do not exacerbate existing health disparities. These findings add to a small but growing body of evidence testing narrative health education materials in individuals with low health literacy, and provide new evidence supporting narrative, entertainment-education style video as a health communication tool to help reduce health literacy-related health disparities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-48
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Communication in Healthcare
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2016

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
Health Education
health promotion
Education
literacy
Health
narrative
health
Population
Health Communication
entertainment
evidence
communication
Motion Pictures
video
Communication
health information

Keywords

  • Cervical cancer
  • Entertainment-education
  • Health communication
  • Health disparities
  • Health literacy
  • HPV
  • Knowledge
  • Narrative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

A pilot test of the acceptability and efficacy of narrative and non-narrative health education materials in a low health literacy population. / Moran, Meghan; Frank, Lauren B.; Chatterjee, Joyee S.; Murphy, Sheila T.; Baezconde-Garbanati, Lourdes.

In: Journal of Communication in Healthcare, Vol. 9, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 40-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moran, Meghan ; Frank, Lauren B. ; Chatterjee, Joyee S. ; Murphy, Sheila T. ; Baezconde-Garbanati, Lourdes. / A pilot test of the acceptability and efficacy of narrative and non-narrative health education materials in a low health literacy population. In: Journal of Communication in Healthcare. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 40-48.
@article{344bb08b0e27444c899fa2157cf2734c,
title = "A pilot test of the acceptability and efficacy of narrative and non-narrative health education materials in a low health literacy population",
abstract = "Abstract: Although entertainment-education narratives are increasingly being used to communicate health information to a diversity of populations, there is limited evidence examining the use of narrative health education videos in low compared with adequate health literacy populations. There are also very few studies directly comparing narrative materials to more traditional, non-narrative materials. Because individuals with low health literacy are less likely than those with adequate health literacy to benefit from health communication interventions, it is especially important to develop an evidence base supporting the use of narrative health education materials in low-literacy populations. This study extends knowledge on the use of narrative health education materials in populations with low health literacy by conducting a randomized trial comparing the acceptability and efficacy (knowledge gain) of two fact-equivalent films, one in a narrative and one in a non-narrative format, on individuals with adequate and low health literacy. This study finds that while both films were well-accepted and produced knowledge gains, the narrative film was more effective in this regard. This effect occurred regardless of health literacy level, indicating that narrative health communication materials are appropriate for individuals with low health literacy and do not exacerbate existing health disparities. These findings add to a small but growing body of evidence testing narrative health education materials in individuals with low health literacy, and provide new evidence supporting narrative, entertainment-education style video as a health communication tool to help reduce health literacy-related health disparities.",
keywords = "Cervical cancer, Entertainment-education, Health communication, Health disparities, Health literacy, HPV, Knowledge, Narrative",
author = "Meghan Moran and Frank, {Lauren B.} and Chatterjee, {Joyee S.} and Murphy, {Sheila T.} and Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/17538068.2015.1126995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "40--48",
journal = "Journal of Communication in Healthcare",
issn = "1753-8068",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pilot test of the acceptability and efficacy of narrative and non-narrative health education materials in a low health literacy population

AU - Moran, Meghan

AU - Frank, Lauren B.

AU - Chatterjee, Joyee S.

AU - Murphy, Sheila T.

AU - Baezconde-Garbanati, Lourdes

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - Abstract: Although entertainment-education narratives are increasingly being used to communicate health information to a diversity of populations, there is limited evidence examining the use of narrative health education videos in low compared with adequate health literacy populations. There are also very few studies directly comparing narrative materials to more traditional, non-narrative materials. Because individuals with low health literacy are less likely than those with adequate health literacy to benefit from health communication interventions, it is especially important to develop an evidence base supporting the use of narrative health education materials in low-literacy populations. This study extends knowledge on the use of narrative health education materials in populations with low health literacy by conducting a randomized trial comparing the acceptability and efficacy (knowledge gain) of two fact-equivalent films, one in a narrative and one in a non-narrative format, on individuals with adequate and low health literacy. This study finds that while both films were well-accepted and produced knowledge gains, the narrative film was more effective in this regard. This effect occurred regardless of health literacy level, indicating that narrative health communication materials are appropriate for individuals with low health literacy and do not exacerbate existing health disparities. These findings add to a small but growing body of evidence testing narrative health education materials in individuals with low health literacy, and provide new evidence supporting narrative, entertainment-education style video as a health communication tool to help reduce health literacy-related health disparities.

AB - Abstract: Although entertainment-education narratives are increasingly being used to communicate health information to a diversity of populations, there is limited evidence examining the use of narrative health education videos in low compared with adequate health literacy populations. There are also very few studies directly comparing narrative materials to more traditional, non-narrative materials. Because individuals with low health literacy are less likely than those with adequate health literacy to benefit from health communication interventions, it is especially important to develop an evidence base supporting the use of narrative health education materials in low-literacy populations. This study extends knowledge on the use of narrative health education materials in populations with low health literacy by conducting a randomized trial comparing the acceptability and efficacy (knowledge gain) of two fact-equivalent films, one in a narrative and one in a non-narrative format, on individuals with adequate and low health literacy. This study finds that while both films were well-accepted and produced knowledge gains, the narrative film was more effective in this regard. This effect occurred regardless of health literacy level, indicating that narrative health communication materials are appropriate for individuals with low health literacy and do not exacerbate existing health disparities. These findings add to a small but growing body of evidence testing narrative health education materials in individuals with low health literacy, and provide new evidence supporting narrative, entertainment-education style video as a health communication tool to help reduce health literacy-related health disparities.

KW - Cervical cancer

KW - Entertainment-education

KW - Health communication

KW - Health disparities

KW - Health literacy

KW - HPV

KW - Knowledge

KW - Narrative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978389015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978389015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17538068.2015.1126995

DO - 10.1080/17538068.2015.1126995

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 40

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Communication in Healthcare

JF - Journal of Communication in Healthcare

SN - 1753-8068

IS - 1

ER -