A phase II evaluation of AMG 102 (rilotumumab) in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Lainie P. Martin, Michael Sill, Mark S. Shahin, Matthew Powell, Paul Disilvestro, Lisa M. Landrum, Stephanie L. Gaillard, Michael J. Goodheart, James Hoffman, Russell J. Schilder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective This open-label, multi-institutional phase II trial evaluated activity and safety of rilotumumab (AMG 102), a monoclonal antibody that targets HGF (hepatocyte growth factor), the ligand for the MET receptor, in women with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer. Patients and methods Women were eligible for treatment with rilotumumab if they had measurable disease, a performance status of 0, 1 or 2, previously received platinum-based therapy with a progression-free interval of < 12 months or a second recurrence, and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Patients received rilotumumab 20 mg/kg IV every 14 days until evidence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The study utilized co-dual primary endpoints of tumor response and six-month PFS to assess the efficacy of rilotumumab. Secondary endpoints included the frequency and severity of adverse events and the duration of progression-free and overall survival. Results Thirty-one women enrolled and received rilotumumab. All were eligible for analysis. One patient achieved a complete response (3.2%; 90% CI 0.2-14%), and two women had 6-month PFS (6.5%; 90% CI 1.1-19%). Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2, with no grade 4 adverse events. Grade 3 adverse events were gastrointestinal (4), metabolic (3) anemia (3), a thromboembolic event (1), ventricular tachycardia (1), hypotension during infusion (1) and fatigue (1). The study was stopped after the first stage of accrual. Conclusion Rilotumumab was well-tolerated, but had limited activity. The level of activity does not warrant further evaluation of rilotumumab as a single agent in patients with ovarian cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)526-530
Number of pages5
JournalGynecologic oncology
Volume132
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • AMG 102
  • Clinical trial
  • HGF
  • OVARIAN CANCER
  • Rilotumumab MET
  • Scatter factor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A phase II evaluation of AMG 102 (rilotumumab) in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this