TY - JOUR
T1 - A phase II evaluation of AMG 102 (rilotumumab) in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma
T2 - A Gynecologic Oncology Group study
AU - Martin, Lainie P.
AU - Sill, Michael
AU - Shahin, Mark S.
AU - Powell, Matthew
AU - Disilvestro, Paul
AU - Landrum, Lisa M.
AU - Gaillard, Stephanie L.
AU - Goodheart, Michael J.
AU - Hoffman, James
AU - Schilder, Russell J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grants to the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Administrative Office ( CA 27469 ) and the Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical Office ( CA 37517 ). The following Gynecologic Oncology Group member institutions participated in the primary treatment studies: Duke University Medical Center, Abington Memorial Hospital, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of California Medical Center at Irvine, Washington University School of Medicine, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, University of Oklahoma, University of Chicago, Women and Infants Hospital, The Hospital of Central Connecticut and Community Clinical Oncology Program.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - Objective This open-label, multi-institutional phase II trial evaluated activity and safety of rilotumumab (AMG 102), a monoclonal antibody that targets HGF (hepatocyte growth factor), the ligand for the MET receptor, in women with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer. Patients and methods Women were eligible for treatment with rilotumumab if they had measurable disease, a performance status of 0, 1 or 2, previously received platinum-based therapy with a progression-free interval of < 12 months or a second recurrence, and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Patients received rilotumumab 20 mg/kg IV every 14 days until evidence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The study utilized co-dual primary endpoints of tumor response and six-month PFS to assess the efficacy of rilotumumab. Secondary endpoints included the frequency and severity of adverse events and the duration of progression-free and overall survival. Results Thirty-one women enrolled and received rilotumumab. All were eligible for analysis. One patient achieved a complete response (3.2%; 90% CI 0.2-14%), and two women had 6-month PFS (6.5%; 90% CI 1.1-19%). Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2, with no grade 4 adverse events. Grade 3 adverse events were gastrointestinal (4), metabolic (3) anemia (3), a thromboembolic event (1), ventricular tachycardia (1), hypotension during infusion (1) and fatigue (1). The study was stopped after the first stage of accrual. Conclusion Rilotumumab was well-tolerated, but had limited activity. The level of activity does not warrant further evaluation of rilotumumab as a single agent in patients with ovarian cancer.
AB - Objective This open-label, multi-institutional phase II trial evaluated activity and safety of rilotumumab (AMG 102), a monoclonal antibody that targets HGF (hepatocyte growth factor), the ligand for the MET receptor, in women with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer. Patients and methods Women were eligible for treatment with rilotumumab if they had measurable disease, a performance status of 0, 1 or 2, previously received platinum-based therapy with a progression-free interval of < 12 months or a second recurrence, and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Patients received rilotumumab 20 mg/kg IV every 14 days until evidence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The study utilized co-dual primary endpoints of tumor response and six-month PFS to assess the efficacy of rilotumumab. Secondary endpoints included the frequency and severity of adverse events and the duration of progression-free and overall survival. Results Thirty-one women enrolled and received rilotumumab. All were eligible for analysis. One patient achieved a complete response (3.2%; 90% CI 0.2-14%), and two women had 6-month PFS (6.5%; 90% CI 1.1-19%). Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2, with no grade 4 adverse events. Grade 3 adverse events were gastrointestinal (4), metabolic (3) anemia (3), a thromboembolic event (1), ventricular tachycardia (1), hypotension during infusion (1) and fatigue (1). The study was stopped after the first stage of accrual. Conclusion Rilotumumab was well-tolerated, but had limited activity. The level of activity does not warrant further evaluation of rilotumumab as a single agent in patients with ovarian cancer.
KW - AMG 102
KW - Clinical trial
KW - HGF
KW - OVARIAN CANCER
KW - Rilotumumab MET
KW - Scatter factor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896390900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896390900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.018
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.018
M3 - Article
C2 - 24361733
AN - SCOPUS:84896390900
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 132
SP - 526
EP - 530
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 3
ER -