TY - JOUR
T1 - A Phase 1 Study Evaluating Rovalpituzumab Tesirine in Frontline Treatment of Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC
AU - Hann, Christine L.
AU - Burns, Timothy F.
AU - Dowlati, Afshin
AU - Morgensztern, Daniel
AU - Ward, Patrick J.
AU - Koch, Martina M.
AU - Chen, Chris
AU - Ludwig, Carrianne
AU - Patel, Maulik
AU - Nimeiri, Halla
AU - Komarnitsky, Philip
AU - Camidge, D. Ross
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosure: Dr. Hann reports serving in a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie/StemCentrx, Ascentage, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Genentech/Roche. Dr. Burns reports serving in a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie/Stemcentrx, Blueprint Medicines, Novartis, and Thermo Fisher Scientific. Dr. Dowlati reports receiving nonfinancial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; grants from EMD Serono, Tesaro, Regeneron, Roche, Eli Lilly, Takeda, Ipsen, United Therapeutics, Mirati, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incuron, and Vertex; grants and personal fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Millennium, and Seattle Genetics; and personal fees from Ariad outside of the submitted work. Dr. Morgensztern reports serving as a consultant for AbbVie, Takeda, PharmaMar, and Gilead. Drs. Komarnitsky, Chen, and Patel and Ms. Ludwig are employees of AbbVie and hold AbbVie stock. Drs. Koch and Nimeiri are former employees of AbbVie and may hold AbbVie stock. Dr. Ross reports serving in an advisory role (ad hoc advisory boards/consultations) for Amgen, Anchiarno (SAB), Apollomics (SRC), AstraZeneca, Bio-Thera (DSMB), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo (ILD adjudication committee), EMD Serono, Elevation (SRC), Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Helssin, Janssen, Onkure, Pfizer, Qilu, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, CBT Pharmaceuticals, G1 Therapeutics (DSMB), Blueprint Medicines, AbbVie, Achilles, BeyondSpring, Apollomics (SRC), Archer, Helssin, Medtronic, Ribon, Arrys/Kyn, Regeneron, Hengrui, Hansoh (SRC), Roche/Genentech, and Inivata; receiving research funding from Takeda for an investigator-initiated trial; and participating in company-sponsored trials for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Hansoh, Inhibrx, Karyopharm, Lycera, Medimmune, Merck, Pfizer, Phosplatin, Psioxus, Rain, Roche/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Symphogen, Takeda, and Tolero. Dr. Ward declares no conflict of interest.
Funding Information:
AbbVie funded this study and participated in the study design, research, analysis, data collection, interpretation of data, reviewing, and approval of the publication. All authors had access to relevant data and participated in the drafting, review, and approval of this publication. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Rovalpituzumab tesirine has been developed by AbbVie, Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Swati Ghatpande, PhD, of Bio Connections, LLC, funded by AbbVie, Inc. This work was supported by AbbVie, which provided financial support for the conduct of the research and preparation of the article. The authors thank all the trial investigators and the patients who participated in this clinical trial.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Introduction: Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting DLL3, a Notch pathway ligand highly expressed on SCLC cells. Rova-T was evaluated alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin combined with etoposide [CE]) in frontline treatment of extensive-stage SCLC. Methods: One cycle of CE pre-enrollment was permitted (later mandated). The following four cohorts were enrolled: Rova-T monotherapy (0.3 mg/kg, every 6 [q6] wk × 2; cohort 1; n = 4); Rova-T induction (0.3 mg/kg, q6 wk × 2) followed by CE every 21 days (q21) × 4 (cohort 2; n = 5); Rova-T (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg, q6 wk × 2) overlapping with CE q21 × 4 (cohort 3; n = 14); and Rova-T maintenance (0.3 mg/kg, q6 wk × 2) after CE q21 × 4 (cohort 4; n = 3). Results: A total of 26 patients were dosed (cohort 3: 14; cohorts 1, 2, and 4 combined: 12). Median age was 66 years, and 73% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. In cohort 3, seven patients (50%) had confirmed objective responses, with a median progression-free survival of 5.2 months and median overall survival of 10.3 months. Compared with cohorts 1, 2, and 4 combined, cohort 3 had lower frequency of some Rova-T–related adverse events of special interest, such as pleural effusion (0 versus 33%), pericardial effusion (0 versus 17%), ascites (0 versus 8%), peripheral edema (36% versus 42%), generalized edema (0 versus 8%), pneumonia (7% versus 25%), and hypoalbuminemia (0 versus 17%). Conclusions: Lower Rova-T doses may be associated with lower incidence of some Rova-T–related adverse events of special interest. Rova-T 0.2 mg/kg plus CE (cohort 3) was tolerable; however, there was no clear efficacy benefit of adding Rova-T to CE.
AB - Introduction: Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting DLL3, a Notch pathway ligand highly expressed on SCLC cells. Rova-T was evaluated alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin combined with etoposide [CE]) in frontline treatment of extensive-stage SCLC. Methods: One cycle of CE pre-enrollment was permitted (later mandated). The following four cohorts were enrolled: Rova-T monotherapy (0.3 mg/kg, every 6 [q6] wk × 2; cohort 1; n = 4); Rova-T induction (0.3 mg/kg, q6 wk × 2) followed by CE every 21 days (q21) × 4 (cohort 2; n = 5); Rova-T (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg, q6 wk × 2) overlapping with CE q21 × 4 (cohort 3; n = 14); and Rova-T maintenance (0.3 mg/kg, q6 wk × 2) after CE q21 × 4 (cohort 4; n = 3). Results: A total of 26 patients were dosed (cohort 3: 14; cohorts 1, 2, and 4 combined: 12). Median age was 66 years, and 73% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. In cohort 3, seven patients (50%) had confirmed objective responses, with a median progression-free survival of 5.2 months and median overall survival of 10.3 months. Compared with cohorts 1, 2, and 4 combined, cohort 3 had lower frequency of some Rova-T–related adverse events of special interest, such as pleural effusion (0 versus 33%), pericardial effusion (0 versus 17%), ascites (0 versus 8%), peripheral edema (36% versus 42%), generalized edema (0 versus 8%), pneumonia (7% versus 25%), and hypoalbuminemia (0 versus 17%). Conclusions: Lower Rova-T doses may be associated with lower incidence of some Rova-T–related adverse events of special interest. Rova-T 0.2 mg/kg plus CE (cohort 3) was tolerable; however, there was no clear efficacy benefit of adding Rova-T to CE.
KW - DLL3
KW - Frontline
KW - Platinum-based chemotherapy
KW - Rovalpituzumab tesirine
KW - Small cell lung cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111377610&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111377610&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.022
DO - 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 34242790
AN - SCOPUS:85111377610
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 16
SP - 1582
EP - 1588
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
IS - 9
ER -