A novel personal protective equipment coverall was rated higher than standard Ebola virus personal protective equipment in terms of comfort, mobility and perception of safety when tested by health care workers in Liberia and in a United States biocontainment unit

Brian Thomas Garibaldi, Chandrakant Ruparelia, Katy Shaw Saliba, Lauren Sauer, Lisa Maragakis, Margaret Glancey, Marion Subah, Allyson R. Nelson, Colby Wilkason, Laura Scavo, Lindsay Litwin, Patience Osei, Youseph Yazdi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: During the 2014-2016 Ebola virus epidemic, more than 500 health care workers (HCWs) died in spite of the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The Johns Hopkins University Center for Bioengineering Innovation and Design (CBID) and Jhpiego, an international nongovernmental organization affiliate of Johns Hopkins, collaborated to create new PPE to improve the ease of the doffing process. Methods: HCWs in Liberia and a US biocontainment unit compared standard Médecins Sans Frontière PPE (PPE A) with the new PPE (PPE B). Participants wore each PPE ensemble while performing simulated patient care activities. Range of motion, time to doff, comfort, and perceived risk were measured. Results: Overall, 100% of participants preferred PPE B over PPE A (P <.0001); 98.1% of respondents would recommend PPE B for their home clinical unit (P <.0001). There was a trend towards greater comfort in PPE B. HCWs at both sites felt more at risk in PPE A than PPE B (71.9% vs 25% in Liberia, P <.0001; 100% vs 40% in the US biocontainment unit, P <.0001). Conclusions: HCWs preferred a new PPE ensemble to Médecins Sans Frontière PPE for high-consequence pathogens. Further studies on the safety of this new PPE need to be conducted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Liberia
Ebolavirus
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Personal Protective Equipment
Bioengineering

Keywords

  • Health care worker safety
  • High consequence pathogens
  • Infection prevention
  • Viral hemorrhagic fever

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

@article{f932fa3a7582416ebcc12b225ae07291,
title = "A novel personal protective equipment coverall was rated higher than standard Ebola virus personal protective equipment in terms of comfort, mobility and perception of safety when tested by health care workers in Liberia and in a United States biocontainment unit",
abstract = "Background: During the 2014-2016 Ebola virus epidemic, more than 500 health care workers (HCWs) died in spite of the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The Johns Hopkins University Center for Bioengineering Innovation and Design (CBID) and Jhpiego, an international nongovernmental organization affiliate of Johns Hopkins, collaborated to create new PPE to improve the ease of the doffing process. Methods: HCWs in Liberia and a US biocontainment unit compared standard M{\'e}decins Sans Fronti{\`e}re PPE (PPE A) with the new PPE (PPE B). Participants wore each PPE ensemble while performing simulated patient care activities. Range of motion, time to doff, comfort, and perceived risk were measured. Results: Overall, 100{\%} of participants preferred PPE B over PPE A (P <.0001); 98.1{\%} of respondents would recommend PPE B for their home clinical unit (P <.0001). There was a trend towards greater comfort in PPE B. HCWs at both sites felt more at risk in PPE A than PPE B (71.9{\%} vs 25{\%} in Liberia, P <.0001; 100{\%} vs 40{\%} in the US biocontainment unit, P <.0001). Conclusions: HCWs preferred a new PPE ensemble to M{\'e}decins Sans Fronti{\`e}re PPE for high-consequence pathogens. Further studies on the safety of this new PPE need to be conducted.",
keywords = "Health care worker safety, High consequence pathogens, Infection prevention, Viral hemorrhagic fever",
author = "Garibaldi, {Brian Thomas} and Chandrakant Ruparelia and {Shaw Saliba}, Katy and Lauren Sauer and Lisa Maragakis and Margaret Glancey and Marion Subah and Nelson, {Allyson R.} and Colby Wilkason and Laura Scavo and Lindsay Litwin and Patience Osei and Youseph Yazdi",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajic.2018.08.014",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Infection Control",
issn = "0196-6553",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel personal protective equipment coverall was rated higher than standard Ebola virus personal protective equipment in terms of comfort, mobility and perception of safety when tested by health care workers in Liberia and in a United States biocontainment unit

AU - Garibaldi, Brian Thomas

AU - Ruparelia, Chandrakant

AU - Shaw Saliba, Katy

AU - Sauer, Lauren

AU - Maragakis, Lisa

AU - Glancey, Margaret

AU - Subah, Marion

AU - Nelson, Allyson R.

AU - Wilkason, Colby

AU - Scavo, Laura

AU - Litwin, Lindsay

AU - Osei, Patience

AU - Yazdi, Youseph

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: During the 2014-2016 Ebola virus epidemic, more than 500 health care workers (HCWs) died in spite of the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The Johns Hopkins University Center for Bioengineering Innovation and Design (CBID) and Jhpiego, an international nongovernmental organization affiliate of Johns Hopkins, collaborated to create new PPE to improve the ease of the doffing process. Methods: HCWs in Liberia and a US biocontainment unit compared standard Médecins Sans Frontière PPE (PPE A) with the new PPE (PPE B). Participants wore each PPE ensemble while performing simulated patient care activities. Range of motion, time to doff, comfort, and perceived risk were measured. Results: Overall, 100% of participants preferred PPE B over PPE A (P <.0001); 98.1% of respondents would recommend PPE B for their home clinical unit (P <.0001). There was a trend towards greater comfort in PPE B. HCWs at both sites felt more at risk in PPE A than PPE B (71.9% vs 25% in Liberia, P <.0001; 100% vs 40% in the US biocontainment unit, P <.0001). Conclusions: HCWs preferred a new PPE ensemble to Médecins Sans Frontière PPE for high-consequence pathogens. Further studies on the safety of this new PPE need to be conducted.

AB - Background: During the 2014-2016 Ebola virus epidemic, more than 500 health care workers (HCWs) died in spite of the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The Johns Hopkins University Center for Bioengineering Innovation and Design (CBID) and Jhpiego, an international nongovernmental organization affiliate of Johns Hopkins, collaborated to create new PPE to improve the ease of the doffing process. Methods: HCWs in Liberia and a US biocontainment unit compared standard Médecins Sans Frontière PPE (PPE A) with the new PPE (PPE B). Participants wore each PPE ensemble while performing simulated patient care activities. Range of motion, time to doff, comfort, and perceived risk were measured. Results: Overall, 100% of participants preferred PPE B over PPE A (P <.0001); 98.1% of respondents would recommend PPE B for their home clinical unit (P <.0001). There was a trend towards greater comfort in PPE B. HCWs at both sites felt more at risk in PPE A than PPE B (71.9% vs 25% in Liberia, P <.0001; 100% vs 40% in the US biocontainment unit, P <.0001). Conclusions: HCWs preferred a new PPE ensemble to Médecins Sans Frontière PPE for high-consequence pathogens. Further studies on the safety of this new PPE need to be conducted.

KW - Health care worker safety

KW - High consequence pathogens

KW - Infection prevention

KW - Viral hemorrhagic fever

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058466436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058466436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.08.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.08.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 30301656

AN - SCOPUS:85058466436

JO - American Journal of Infection Control

JF - American Journal of Infection Control

SN - 0196-6553

ER -