## Abstract

Correlated response data often arise in longitudinal and familial studies. The marginal regression model and its associated generalized estimating equation (GEE) method are becoming more and more popular in handling such data. Pepe and Anderson pointed out that there is an important yet implicit assumption behind the marginal model and GEE. If the assumption is violated and a nondiagonal working correlation matrix is used in GEE, biased estimates of regression coefficients may result. On the other hand, if a diagonal correlation matrix is used, irrespective of whether the assumption is violated, the resulting estimates are (nearly) unbiased. A straightforward interpretation of this phenomenon is lacking, in part due to the unavailability of a closed form for the resulting GEE estimates. In this note, we show how the bias may arise in the context of linear regression, where the GEE estimates of regression coefficients are the ordinary or generalized least squares (LS) estimates. Also we explain why the generalized LS estimator may be biased, in contrast to the well-known result that it is usually unbiased. In addition, we discuss the bias properties of the sandwich variance estimator of the ordinary LS estimate.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 191-195 |

Number of pages | 5 |

Journal | American Statistician |

Volume | 54 |

Issue number | 3 |

DOIs | |

State | Published - Aug 2000 |

Externally published | Yes |

## Keywords

- Generalized estimating equation (GEE)
- Generalized least square (GLS)
- Ordinary least square (OLS)

## ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Statistics and Probability
- Mathematics(all)
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty