A new approach to ovarian reserve testing

Wenjie Sun, Barbara J. Stegmann, Melinda Henne, William H. Catherino, James Segars

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To critically examine ovarian reserve testing before assisted reproduction. Design: A PUBMED computer search to identify relevant literature. Setting: Multiple sites. Patient(s): Patients undergoing assisted reproduction. Intervention(s): Testing for ovarian reserve. Main Outcome Measure(s): Assisted reproductive technology (ART) and pregnancy outcomes. Result(s): The prevalence of ovarian insufficiency varies significantly for women aged 30-45 years. Generalization or averaging of threshold values across different aged women leads to very poor sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for all tests of ovarian reserve. Because of the changing prevalence of ovarian insufficiency, there is no single, suitable threshold value for any screening test of ovarian reserve. Our analysis supports dividing impaired ovarian reserve into two groups: age-dependent ovarian aging (physiologic) and premature (nonphysiologic) reductions in the oocyte pool. Interpretation of any screening test used requires that age is considered as a variable. To guide clinical interpretation of test results, we suggest using a nomogram of FSH values versus expected delivery rate-per-cycle-start with ART for a given age. Conclusion(s): Proper interpretation of screening tests for ovarian insufficiency in couples considering ART is important as the presence of impaired ovarian reserve is associated with a low likelihood of pregnancy. The condition of premature (nonphysiologic) ovarian insufficiency warrants additional research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2196-2202
Number of pages7
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume90
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Reproduction
Predictive Value of Tests
Premature Aging
Nomograms
Pregnancy Outcome
Oocytes
Ovarian Reserve
Age Groups
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Sensitivity and Specificity
Pregnancy
Research

Keywords

  • assisted reproduction
  • assisted reproductive technologies (ART)
  • CC challenge test
  • diminished ovarian reserve
  • FSH
  • in vitro fertilization (IVF)
  • inhibin
  • ovarian insufficiency
  • Ovarian reserve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Sun, W., Stegmann, B. J., Henne, M., Catherino, W. H., & Segars, J. (2008). A new approach to ovarian reserve testing. Fertility and Sterility, 90(6), 2196-2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.080

A new approach to ovarian reserve testing. / Sun, Wenjie; Stegmann, Barbara J.; Henne, Melinda; Catherino, William H.; Segars, James.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 90, No. 6, 12.2008, p. 2196-2202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sun, W, Stegmann, BJ, Henne, M, Catherino, WH & Segars, J 2008, 'A new approach to ovarian reserve testing', Fertility and Sterility, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 2196-2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.080
Sun, Wenjie ; Stegmann, Barbara J. ; Henne, Melinda ; Catherino, William H. ; Segars, James. / A new approach to ovarian reserve testing. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2008 ; Vol. 90, No. 6. pp. 2196-2202.
@article{7d80d50116bc4b74a04c88211f02d7c3,
title = "A new approach to ovarian reserve testing",
abstract = "Objective: To critically examine ovarian reserve testing before assisted reproduction. Design: A PUBMED computer search to identify relevant literature. Setting: Multiple sites. Patient(s): Patients undergoing assisted reproduction. Intervention(s): Testing for ovarian reserve. Main Outcome Measure(s): Assisted reproductive technology (ART) and pregnancy outcomes. Result(s): The prevalence of ovarian insufficiency varies significantly for women aged 30-45 years. Generalization or averaging of threshold values across different aged women leads to very poor sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for all tests of ovarian reserve. Because of the changing prevalence of ovarian insufficiency, there is no single, suitable threshold value for any screening test of ovarian reserve. Our analysis supports dividing impaired ovarian reserve into two groups: age-dependent ovarian aging (physiologic) and premature (nonphysiologic) reductions in the oocyte pool. Interpretation of any screening test used requires that age is considered as a variable. To guide clinical interpretation of test results, we suggest using a nomogram of FSH values versus expected delivery rate-per-cycle-start with ART for a given age. Conclusion(s): Proper interpretation of screening tests for ovarian insufficiency in couples considering ART is important as the presence of impaired ovarian reserve is associated with a low likelihood of pregnancy. The condition of premature (nonphysiologic) ovarian insufficiency warrants additional research.",
keywords = "assisted reproduction, assisted reproductive technologies (ART), CC challenge test, diminished ovarian reserve, FSH, in vitro fertilization (IVF), inhibin, ovarian insufficiency, Ovarian reserve",
author = "Wenjie Sun and Stegmann, {Barbara J.} and Melinda Henne and Catherino, {William H.} and James Segars",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.080",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "2196--2202",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new approach to ovarian reserve testing

AU - Sun, Wenjie

AU - Stegmann, Barbara J.

AU - Henne, Melinda

AU - Catherino, William H.

AU - Segars, James

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Objective: To critically examine ovarian reserve testing before assisted reproduction. Design: A PUBMED computer search to identify relevant literature. Setting: Multiple sites. Patient(s): Patients undergoing assisted reproduction. Intervention(s): Testing for ovarian reserve. Main Outcome Measure(s): Assisted reproductive technology (ART) and pregnancy outcomes. Result(s): The prevalence of ovarian insufficiency varies significantly for women aged 30-45 years. Generalization or averaging of threshold values across different aged women leads to very poor sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for all tests of ovarian reserve. Because of the changing prevalence of ovarian insufficiency, there is no single, suitable threshold value for any screening test of ovarian reserve. Our analysis supports dividing impaired ovarian reserve into two groups: age-dependent ovarian aging (physiologic) and premature (nonphysiologic) reductions in the oocyte pool. Interpretation of any screening test used requires that age is considered as a variable. To guide clinical interpretation of test results, we suggest using a nomogram of FSH values versus expected delivery rate-per-cycle-start with ART for a given age. Conclusion(s): Proper interpretation of screening tests for ovarian insufficiency in couples considering ART is important as the presence of impaired ovarian reserve is associated with a low likelihood of pregnancy. The condition of premature (nonphysiologic) ovarian insufficiency warrants additional research.

AB - Objective: To critically examine ovarian reserve testing before assisted reproduction. Design: A PUBMED computer search to identify relevant literature. Setting: Multiple sites. Patient(s): Patients undergoing assisted reproduction. Intervention(s): Testing for ovarian reserve. Main Outcome Measure(s): Assisted reproductive technology (ART) and pregnancy outcomes. Result(s): The prevalence of ovarian insufficiency varies significantly for women aged 30-45 years. Generalization or averaging of threshold values across different aged women leads to very poor sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for all tests of ovarian reserve. Because of the changing prevalence of ovarian insufficiency, there is no single, suitable threshold value for any screening test of ovarian reserve. Our analysis supports dividing impaired ovarian reserve into two groups: age-dependent ovarian aging (physiologic) and premature (nonphysiologic) reductions in the oocyte pool. Interpretation of any screening test used requires that age is considered as a variable. To guide clinical interpretation of test results, we suggest using a nomogram of FSH values versus expected delivery rate-per-cycle-start with ART for a given age. Conclusion(s): Proper interpretation of screening tests for ovarian insufficiency in couples considering ART is important as the presence of impaired ovarian reserve is associated with a low likelihood of pregnancy. The condition of premature (nonphysiologic) ovarian insufficiency warrants additional research.

KW - assisted reproduction

KW - assisted reproductive technologies (ART)

KW - CC challenge test

KW - diminished ovarian reserve

KW - FSH

KW - in vitro fertilization (IVF)

KW - inhibin

KW - ovarian insufficiency

KW - Ovarian reserve

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56649085310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56649085310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.080

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.080

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 2196

EP - 2202

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 6

ER -