A national survey of state medicaid psychotropic-monitoring programs targeting youths

Susan DosReis, Ming Hui Tai, Wendy Castillo Camelo, Gloria Reeves

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to describe state Medicaid psychotropic-monitoring programs targeting youths. Methods: Key informants from each state Medicaid administration and the District of Columbia were invited to participate in a telephone-administered survey designed to assess the implementation strategies of the state psychotropic-monitoring program. Data were collected from August 2011 through December 2012. A total of 38 states participated, four declined, and nine did not respond to the invitation. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize monitoring programs. Results: Key informants from 28 of the 38 states (74%) reported a program in place, mostly prior authorization (68%). One-third of the programs (32%) had a two-tier review involving pharmacists and child psychiatrists. Conclusions: Although variability in psychotropic-monitoring programs may limit comparison of program impact across states, the variability provides an opportunity to investigate the impact of different models on best practices and the quality of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1146-1148
Number of pages3
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume67
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medicaid
Quality of Health Care
Practice Guidelines
Pharmacists
Telephone
Psychiatry
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

A national survey of state medicaid psychotropic-monitoring programs targeting youths. / DosReis, Susan; Tai, Ming Hui; Camelo, Wendy Castillo; Reeves, Gloria.

In: Psychiatric Services, Vol. 67, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 1146-1148.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

DosReis, Susan ; Tai, Ming Hui ; Camelo, Wendy Castillo ; Reeves, Gloria. / A national survey of state medicaid psychotropic-monitoring programs targeting youths. In: Psychiatric Services. 2016 ; Vol. 67, No. 10. pp. 1146-1148.
@article{389fd8e57948483598c2264dc8ec7ebf,
title = "A national survey of state medicaid psychotropic-monitoring programs targeting youths",
abstract = "Objective: This study aimed to describe state Medicaid psychotropic-monitoring programs targeting youths. Methods: Key informants from each state Medicaid administration and the District of Columbia were invited to participate in a telephone-administered survey designed to assess the implementation strategies of the state psychotropic-monitoring program. Data were collected from August 2011 through December 2012. A total of 38 states participated, four declined, and nine did not respond to the invitation. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize monitoring programs. Results: Key informants from 28 of the 38 states (74{\%}) reported a program in place, mostly prior authorization (68{\%}). One-third of the programs (32{\%}) had a two-tier review involving pharmacists and child psychiatrists. Conclusions: Although variability in psychotropic-monitoring programs may limit comparison of program impact across states, the variability provides an opportunity to investigate the impact of different models on best practices and the quality of care.",
author = "Susan DosReis and Tai, {Ming Hui} and Camelo, {Wendy Castillo} and Gloria Reeves",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ps.201500270",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "1146--1148",
journal = "Psychiatric Services",
issn = "1075-2730",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A national survey of state medicaid psychotropic-monitoring programs targeting youths

AU - DosReis, Susan

AU - Tai, Ming Hui

AU - Camelo, Wendy Castillo

AU - Reeves, Gloria

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Objective: This study aimed to describe state Medicaid psychotropic-monitoring programs targeting youths. Methods: Key informants from each state Medicaid administration and the District of Columbia were invited to participate in a telephone-administered survey designed to assess the implementation strategies of the state psychotropic-monitoring program. Data were collected from August 2011 through December 2012. A total of 38 states participated, four declined, and nine did not respond to the invitation. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize monitoring programs. Results: Key informants from 28 of the 38 states (74%) reported a program in place, mostly prior authorization (68%). One-third of the programs (32%) had a two-tier review involving pharmacists and child psychiatrists. Conclusions: Although variability in psychotropic-monitoring programs may limit comparison of program impact across states, the variability provides an opportunity to investigate the impact of different models on best practices and the quality of care.

AB - Objective: This study aimed to describe state Medicaid psychotropic-monitoring programs targeting youths. Methods: Key informants from each state Medicaid administration and the District of Columbia were invited to participate in a telephone-administered survey designed to assess the implementation strategies of the state psychotropic-monitoring program. Data were collected from August 2011 through December 2012. A total of 38 states participated, four declined, and nine did not respond to the invitation. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize monitoring programs. Results: Key informants from 28 of the 38 states (74%) reported a program in place, mostly prior authorization (68%). One-third of the programs (32%) had a two-tier review involving pharmacists and child psychiatrists. Conclusions: Although variability in psychotropic-monitoring programs may limit comparison of program impact across states, the variability provides an opportunity to investigate the impact of different models on best practices and the quality of care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989890622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989890622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.201500270

DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.201500270

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27133725

AN - SCOPUS:84989890622

VL - 67

SP - 1146

EP - 1148

JO - Psychiatric Services

JF - Psychiatric Services

SN - 1075-2730

IS - 10

ER -