A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules

SungWoo Kahng, Brian A. Iwata, Rachel H. Thompson, Gregory P. Hanley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We evaluated one method for determining whether response suppression under noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) is a function of satiation or extinction. Three individuals with developmental disabilities who engaged in self-injurious behavior (SIB) or aggression participated. Results of functional analyses indicated that their problem behavior was maintained by social-positive reinforcement. NCR procedures, individualized for each participant, were implemented in a multiple baseline across subjects design and were associated with decreases in all participants' problem behavior. Identification of the mechanism by which NCR produced these effects was based on examination of cumulative records showing response patterns during and immediately following each NCR session. Satiation during NCR should lead to a temporary increase in responding during the post-NCR (extinction) period due to a transition from the availability to the unavailability of reinforcement (satiation to deprivation). Alternatively, extinction during NCR should reveal no increase in responding during the extinction period because the contingency for the problem behavior would remain unchanged and the transition from satiation to deprivation conditions would be irrelevant. Results suggested that the operative mechanisms of NCR were idiosyncratic across the 3 participants and appeared to change during treatment for 1 of the participants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-432
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Volume33
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2000

Fingerprint

Satiation
Reinforcement Schedule
reinforcement
deprivation
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Psychological Extinction
Reinforcement
Extinction
Self-Injurious Behavior
Developmental Disabilities
suppression
Aggression
contingency
aggression
disability

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Extinction
  • Functional analysis
  • Noncontingent reinforcement
  • Satiation
  • Self-injurious behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules. / Kahng, SungWoo; Iwata, Brian A.; Thompson, Rachel H.; Hanley, Gregory P.

In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 33, No. 4, 12.2000, p. 419-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kahng, SungWoo ; Iwata, Brian A. ; Thompson, Rachel H. ; Hanley, Gregory P. / A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules. In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2000 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 419-432.
@article{6348deb1e6f14519919fcbb4907fc6da,
title = "A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules",
abstract = "We evaluated one method for determining whether response suppression under noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) is a function of satiation or extinction. Three individuals with developmental disabilities who engaged in self-injurious behavior (SIB) or aggression participated. Results of functional analyses indicated that their problem behavior was maintained by social-positive reinforcement. NCR procedures, individualized for each participant, were implemented in a multiple baseline across subjects design and were associated with decreases in all participants' problem behavior. Identification of the mechanism by which NCR produced these effects was based on examination of cumulative records showing response patterns during and immediately following each NCR session. Satiation during NCR should lead to a temporary increase in responding during the post-NCR (extinction) period due to a transition from the availability to the unavailability of reinforcement (satiation to deprivation). Alternatively, extinction during NCR should reveal no increase in responding during the extinction period because the contingency for the problem behavior would remain unchanged and the transition from satiation to deprivation conditions would be irrelevant. Results suggested that the operative mechanisms of NCR were idiosyncratic across the 3 participants and appeared to change during treatment for 1 of the participants.",
keywords = "Aggression, Extinction, Functional analysis, Noncontingent reinforcement, Satiation, Self-injurious behavior",
author = "SungWoo Kahng and Iwata, {Brian A.} and Thompson, {Rachel H.} and Hanley, {Gregory P.}",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "419--432",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules

AU - Kahng, SungWoo

AU - Iwata, Brian A.

AU - Thompson, Rachel H.

AU - Hanley, Gregory P.

PY - 2000/12

Y1 - 2000/12

N2 - We evaluated one method for determining whether response suppression under noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) is a function of satiation or extinction. Three individuals with developmental disabilities who engaged in self-injurious behavior (SIB) or aggression participated. Results of functional analyses indicated that their problem behavior was maintained by social-positive reinforcement. NCR procedures, individualized for each participant, were implemented in a multiple baseline across subjects design and were associated with decreases in all participants' problem behavior. Identification of the mechanism by which NCR produced these effects was based on examination of cumulative records showing response patterns during and immediately following each NCR session. Satiation during NCR should lead to a temporary increase in responding during the post-NCR (extinction) period due to a transition from the availability to the unavailability of reinforcement (satiation to deprivation). Alternatively, extinction during NCR should reveal no increase in responding during the extinction period because the contingency for the problem behavior would remain unchanged and the transition from satiation to deprivation conditions would be irrelevant. Results suggested that the operative mechanisms of NCR were idiosyncratic across the 3 participants and appeared to change during treatment for 1 of the participants.

AB - We evaluated one method for determining whether response suppression under noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) is a function of satiation or extinction. Three individuals with developmental disabilities who engaged in self-injurious behavior (SIB) or aggression participated. Results of functional analyses indicated that their problem behavior was maintained by social-positive reinforcement. NCR procedures, individualized for each participant, were implemented in a multiple baseline across subjects design and were associated with decreases in all participants' problem behavior. Identification of the mechanism by which NCR produced these effects was based on examination of cumulative records showing response patterns during and immediately following each NCR session. Satiation during NCR should lead to a temporary increase in responding during the post-NCR (extinction) period due to a transition from the availability to the unavailability of reinforcement (satiation to deprivation). Alternatively, extinction during NCR should reveal no increase in responding during the extinction period because the contingency for the problem behavior would remain unchanged and the transition from satiation to deprivation conditions would be irrelevant. Results suggested that the operative mechanisms of NCR were idiosyncratic across the 3 participants and appeared to change during treatment for 1 of the participants.

KW - Aggression

KW - Extinction

KW - Functional analysis

KW - Noncontingent reinforcement

KW - Satiation

KW - Self-injurious behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034571997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034571997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11214020

AN - SCOPUS:0034571997

VL - 33

SP - 419

EP - 432

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 4

ER -