A method for attributing patient-level metrics to rotating providers in an inpatient setting

Carrie A Herzke, Henry Joseph Michtalik, Nowella Durkin, Joseph Finkelstein, Amy Deutschendorf, Jason Miller, Curtis Leung, Daniel Brotman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individual provider performance drives group metrics, and increasingly, individual providers are held accountable for these metrics. However, appropriate attribution can be challenging, particularly when multiple providers care for a single patient. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop and operationalize individual provider scorecards that fairly attribute patient-level metrics, such as length of stay and patient satisfaction, to individual hospitalists involved in each patient’s care. DESIGN: Using patients cared for by hospitalists from July 2010 through June 2014, we linked billing data across each hospitalization to assign “ownership” of patient care based on the type, timing, and number of charges associated with each hospitalization (referred to as “provider day weighted”). These metrics were presented to providers via a dashboard that was updated quarterly with their performance (relative to their peers). For the purposes of this article, we compared the method we used to the traditional method of attribution, in which an entire hospitalization is attributed to 1 provider, based on the attending of record as labeled in the administrative data. RESULTS: Provider performance in the 2 methods was concordant 56% to 75% of the time for top half versus bottom half performance (which would be expected to occur by chance 50% of the time). While provider percentile differences between the 2 methods were modest for most providers, there were some providers for whom the methods yielded dramatically different results for 1 or more metrics. CONCLUSION: We found potentially meaningful discrepancies in how well providers scored (relative to their peers) based on the method used for attribution. We demonstrate that it is possible to generate meaningful provider-level metrics from administrative data by using billing data even when multiple providers care for 1 patient over the course of a hospitalization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)470-475
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Hospital Medicine
Volume13
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Inpatients
Hospitalization
Hospitalists
Patient Care
Ownership
Patient Satisfaction
Length of Stay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Fundamentals and skills
  • Health Policy
  • Care Planning
  • Assessment and Diagnosis

Cite this

A method for attributing patient-level metrics to rotating providers in an inpatient setting. / Herzke, Carrie A; Michtalik, Henry Joseph; Durkin, Nowella; Finkelstein, Joseph; Deutschendorf, Amy; Miller, Jason; Leung, Curtis; Brotman, Daniel.

In: Journal of Hospital Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 7, 01.07.2018, p. 470-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herzke, Carrie A ; Michtalik, Henry Joseph ; Durkin, Nowella ; Finkelstein, Joseph ; Deutschendorf, Amy ; Miller, Jason ; Leung, Curtis ; Brotman, Daniel. / A method for attributing patient-level metrics to rotating providers in an inpatient setting. In: Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 7. pp. 470-475.
@article{8a9359b713c9462bbf3478f85712e275,
title = "A method for attributing patient-level metrics to rotating providers in an inpatient setting",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Individual provider performance drives group metrics, and increasingly, individual providers are held accountable for these metrics. However, appropriate attribution can be challenging, particularly when multiple providers care for a single patient. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop and operationalize individual provider scorecards that fairly attribute patient-level metrics, such as length of stay and patient satisfaction, to individual hospitalists involved in each patient’s care. DESIGN: Using patients cared for by hospitalists from July 2010 through June 2014, we linked billing data across each hospitalization to assign “ownership” of patient care based on the type, timing, and number of charges associated with each hospitalization (referred to as “provider day weighted”). These metrics were presented to providers via a dashboard that was updated quarterly with their performance (relative to their peers). For the purposes of this article, we compared the method we used to the traditional method of attribution, in which an entire hospitalization is attributed to 1 provider, based on the attending of record as labeled in the administrative data. RESULTS: Provider performance in the 2 methods was concordant 56{\%} to 75{\%} of the time for top half versus bottom half performance (which would be expected to occur by chance 50{\%} of the time). While provider percentile differences between the 2 methods were modest for most providers, there were some providers for whom the methods yielded dramatically different results for 1 or more metrics. CONCLUSION: We found potentially meaningful discrepancies in how well providers scored (relative to their peers) based on the method used for attribution. We demonstrate that it is possible to generate meaningful provider-level metrics from administrative data by using billing data even when multiple providers care for 1 patient over the course of a hospitalization.",
author = "Herzke, {Carrie A} and Michtalik, {Henry Joseph} and Nowella Durkin and Joseph Finkelstein and Amy Deutschendorf and Jason Miller and Curtis Leung and Daniel Brotman",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.12788/jhm.2897",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "470--475",
journal = "Journal of hospital medicine (Online)",
issn = "1553-5606",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A method for attributing patient-level metrics to rotating providers in an inpatient setting

AU - Herzke, Carrie A

AU - Michtalik, Henry Joseph

AU - Durkin, Nowella

AU - Finkelstein, Joseph

AU - Deutschendorf, Amy

AU - Miller, Jason

AU - Leung, Curtis

AU - Brotman, Daniel

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Individual provider performance drives group metrics, and increasingly, individual providers are held accountable for these metrics. However, appropriate attribution can be challenging, particularly when multiple providers care for a single patient. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop and operationalize individual provider scorecards that fairly attribute patient-level metrics, such as length of stay and patient satisfaction, to individual hospitalists involved in each patient’s care. DESIGN: Using patients cared for by hospitalists from July 2010 through June 2014, we linked billing data across each hospitalization to assign “ownership” of patient care based on the type, timing, and number of charges associated with each hospitalization (referred to as “provider day weighted”). These metrics were presented to providers via a dashboard that was updated quarterly with their performance (relative to their peers). For the purposes of this article, we compared the method we used to the traditional method of attribution, in which an entire hospitalization is attributed to 1 provider, based on the attending of record as labeled in the administrative data. RESULTS: Provider performance in the 2 methods was concordant 56% to 75% of the time for top half versus bottom half performance (which would be expected to occur by chance 50% of the time). While provider percentile differences between the 2 methods were modest for most providers, there were some providers for whom the methods yielded dramatically different results for 1 or more metrics. CONCLUSION: We found potentially meaningful discrepancies in how well providers scored (relative to their peers) based on the method used for attribution. We demonstrate that it is possible to generate meaningful provider-level metrics from administrative data by using billing data even when multiple providers care for 1 patient over the course of a hospitalization.

AB - BACKGROUND: Individual provider performance drives group metrics, and increasingly, individual providers are held accountable for these metrics. However, appropriate attribution can be challenging, particularly when multiple providers care for a single patient. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop and operationalize individual provider scorecards that fairly attribute patient-level metrics, such as length of stay and patient satisfaction, to individual hospitalists involved in each patient’s care. DESIGN: Using patients cared for by hospitalists from July 2010 through June 2014, we linked billing data across each hospitalization to assign “ownership” of patient care based on the type, timing, and number of charges associated with each hospitalization (referred to as “provider day weighted”). These metrics were presented to providers via a dashboard that was updated quarterly with their performance (relative to their peers). For the purposes of this article, we compared the method we used to the traditional method of attribution, in which an entire hospitalization is attributed to 1 provider, based on the attending of record as labeled in the administrative data. RESULTS: Provider performance in the 2 methods was concordant 56% to 75% of the time for top half versus bottom half performance (which would be expected to occur by chance 50% of the time). While provider percentile differences between the 2 methods were modest for most providers, there were some providers for whom the methods yielded dramatically different results for 1 or more metrics. CONCLUSION: We found potentially meaningful discrepancies in how well providers scored (relative to their peers) based on the method used for attribution. We demonstrate that it is possible to generate meaningful provider-level metrics from administrative data by using billing data even when multiple providers care for 1 patient over the course of a hospitalization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052325582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052325582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.12788/jhm.2897

DO - 10.12788/jhm.2897

M3 - Article

C2 - 29261820

AN - SCOPUS:85052325582

VL - 13

SP - 470

EP - 475

JO - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

JF - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

SN - 1553-5606

IS - 7

ER -