A Green's function approach to local rf heating in interventional MRI

Christopher J. Yeung, Ergin Atalar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Current safety regulations for local radiofrequency (rf) heating, developed for externally positioned rf coils, may not be suitable for internal rf coils that are being increasingly used in interventional MRI. This work presents a two-step model for rf heating in an interventional MRI setting: (1) the spatial distribution of power in the sample from the rf pulse (Maxwell's equations); and (2) the transformation of that power to temperature change according to thermal conduction and tissue perfusion (tissue bioheat equation). The tissue bioheat equation is approximated as a linear, shift-invariant system in the case of local rf heating and is fully characterized by its Green's function. Expected temperature distributions are calculated by convolving (averaging) transmit coil specific absorption rate (SAR) distributions with the Green's function. When the input SAR distribution is relatively slowly varying in space, as is the case with excitation by external rf coils, the choice of averaging methods makes virtually no difference on the expected heating as measured by temperature change (ΔT). However, for highly localized SAR distributions, such as those encountered with internal coils in interventional MRI, the Green's function method predicts heating that is significantly different from the averaging method in current regulations. In our opinion, the Green's function method is a better predictor since it is based on a physiological model. The Green's function also elicits a time constant and scaling factor between SAR and ΔT that are both functions of the tissue perfusion rate. This emphasizes the critical importance of perfusion in the heating model. The assumptions made in this model are only valid for local rf heating and should not be applied to whole body heating.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)826-832
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Physics
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2001

Fingerprint

Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Heating
Perfusion
Temperature
Hot Temperature
Safety

Keywords

  • Interventional MRI
  • MRI saftey
  • Rf heating
  • SAR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

A Green's function approach to local rf heating in interventional MRI. / Yeung, Christopher J.; Atalar, Ergin.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 28, No. 5, 05.2001, p. 826-832.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yeung, Christopher J. ; Atalar, Ergin. / A Green's function approach to local rf heating in interventional MRI. In: Medical Physics. 2001 ; Vol. 28, No. 5. pp. 826-832.
@article{4e48dd5b41fe484b942623f345d9fd88,
title = "A Green's function approach to local rf heating in interventional MRI",
abstract = "Current safety regulations for local radiofrequency (rf) heating, developed for externally positioned rf coils, may not be suitable for internal rf coils that are being increasingly used in interventional MRI. This work presents a two-step model for rf heating in an interventional MRI setting: (1) the spatial distribution of power in the sample from the rf pulse (Maxwell's equations); and (2) the transformation of that power to temperature change according to thermal conduction and tissue perfusion (tissue bioheat equation). The tissue bioheat equation is approximated as a linear, shift-invariant system in the case of local rf heating and is fully characterized by its Green's function. Expected temperature distributions are calculated by convolving (averaging) transmit coil specific absorption rate (SAR) distributions with the Green's function. When the input SAR distribution is relatively slowly varying in space, as is the case with excitation by external rf coils, the choice of averaging methods makes virtually no difference on the expected heating as measured by temperature change (ΔT). However, for highly localized SAR distributions, such as those encountered with internal coils in interventional MRI, the Green's function method predicts heating that is significantly different from the averaging method in current regulations. In our opinion, the Green's function method is a better predictor since it is based on a physiological model. The Green's function also elicits a time constant and scaling factor between SAR and ΔT that are both functions of the tissue perfusion rate. This emphasizes the critical importance of perfusion in the heating model. The assumptions made in this model are only valid for local rf heating and should not be applied to whole body heating.",
keywords = "Interventional MRI, MRI saftey, Rf heating, SAR",
author = "Yeung, {Christopher J.} and Ergin Atalar",
year = "2001",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1118/1.1367860",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "826--832",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Green's function approach to local rf heating in interventional MRI

AU - Yeung, Christopher J.

AU - Atalar, Ergin

PY - 2001/5

Y1 - 2001/5

N2 - Current safety regulations for local radiofrequency (rf) heating, developed for externally positioned rf coils, may not be suitable for internal rf coils that are being increasingly used in interventional MRI. This work presents a two-step model for rf heating in an interventional MRI setting: (1) the spatial distribution of power in the sample from the rf pulse (Maxwell's equations); and (2) the transformation of that power to temperature change according to thermal conduction and tissue perfusion (tissue bioheat equation). The tissue bioheat equation is approximated as a linear, shift-invariant system in the case of local rf heating and is fully characterized by its Green's function. Expected temperature distributions are calculated by convolving (averaging) transmit coil specific absorption rate (SAR) distributions with the Green's function. When the input SAR distribution is relatively slowly varying in space, as is the case with excitation by external rf coils, the choice of averaging methods makes virtually no difference on the expected heating as measured by temperature change (ΔT). However, for highly localized SAR distributions, such as those encountered with internal coils in interventional MRI, the Green's function method predicts heating that is significantly different from the averaging method in current regulations. In our opinion, the Green's function method is a better predictor since it is based on a physiological model. The Green's function also elicits a time constant and scaling factor between SAR and ΔT that are both functions of the tissue perfusion rate. This emphasizes the critical importance of perfusion in the heating model. The assumptions made in this model are only valid for local rf heating and should not be applied to whole body heating.

AB - Current safety regulations for local radiofrequency (rf) heating, developed for externally positioned rf coils, may not be suitable for internal rf coils that are being increasingly used in interventional MRI. This work presents a two-step model for rf heating in an interventional MRI setting: (1) the spatial distribution of power in the sample from the rf pulse (Maxwell's equations); and (2) the transformation of that power to temperature change according to thermal conduction and tissue perfusion (tissue bioheat equation). The tissue bioheat equation is approximated as a linear, shift-invariant system in the case of local rf heating and is fully characterized by its Green's function. Expected temperature distributions are calculated by convolving (averaging) transmit coil specific absorption rate (SAR) distributions with the Green's function. When the input SAR distribution is relatively slowly varying in space, as is the case with excitation by external rf coils, the choice of averaging methods makes virtually no difference on the expected heating as measured by temperature change (ΔT). However, for highly localized SAR distributions, such as those encountered with internal coils in interventional MRI, the Green's function method predicts heating that is significantly different from the averaging method in current regulations. In our opinion, the Green's function method is a better predictor since it is based on a physiological model. The Green's function also elicits a time constant and scaling factor between SAR and ΔT that are both functions of the tissue perfusion rate. This emphasizes the critical importance of perfusion in the heating model. The assumptions made in this model are only valid for local rf heating and should not be applied to whole body heating.

KW - Interventional MRI

KW - MRI saftey

KW - Rf heating

KW - SAR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035017776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035017776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1367860

DO - 10.1118/1.1367860

M3 - Article

C2 - 11393478

AN - SCOPUS:0035017776

VL - 28

SP - 826

EP - 832

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 5

ER -