A framework to analyse gender bias in epidemiological research

María Teresa Ruiz-Cantero, Carmen Vives-Cases, Lucía Artazcoz, Ana Delgado, Maria Del Mar García Calvente, Consuelo Miqueo, Isabel Montera, Rocío Ortiz, Elena Ronda, Isabel Ruiz, Carme Valls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

69 Scopus citations

Abstract

The design and analysis of research may cause systematic gender dependent errors to be produced in results because of gender insensitivity or androcentrism. Gender bias in research could be defined as a systematically erroneous gender dependent approach related to social construct, which incorrectly regards women and men as similar/different. Most gender bias can be found in the context of discovery (development of hypotheses), but it has also been found in the context of justification (methodological process), which must be improved. In fact, one of the main effects of gender bias in research is partial or incorrect knowledge in the results, which are systematically different from the real values.This paper discusses some forms of conceptual and methodological bias that may affect women's health. It proposes a framework to analyse gender bias in the design and analysis of research carried out on women's and men's health problems, and on specific women's health issues.Using examples, the framework aims to show the different theoretical perspectives in a social or clinical research context where forms of selection, measurement and confounding bias are produced as a result of gender insensitivity. Finally, this paper underlines the importance of reexamining results so that they may be reinterpreted to produce new gender based knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Volume61
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A framework to analyse gender bias in epidemiological research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this