A field evaluation of the Hardy TB MODS kit™ for the rapid phenotypic diagnosis of tuberculosis and multi-drug resistant tuberculosis

Laura Martin, Jorge Coronel, Dunia Faulx, Melissa Valdez, Mutsumi Metzler, Chris Crudder, Edith Castillo, Luz Caviedes, Louis Grandjean, Mitzi Rodriguez, Jon S. Friedland, Robert H. Gilman, David A.J. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Even though the WHO-endorsed, non-commercial MODS assay offers rapid, reliable TB liquid culture and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) at lower cost than any other diagnostic, uptake has been patchy. In part this reflects misperceptions about in-house assay quality assurance, but user convenience of one-stop procurement is also important. A commercial MODS kit was developed by Hardy Diagnostics (Santa Maria, CA, USA) with PATH (Seattle, WA, USA) to facilitate procurement, simplify procedures through readymade media, and enhance safety with a sealing silicone plate lid. Here we report the results from a large-scale field evaluation of the MODS kit in a government service laboratory. Methods & Findings: 2446 sputum samples were cultured in parallel in Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ), conventional MODS and in the MODS kit. MODS kit DST was compared with conventional MODS (direct) DST and proportion method (indirect) DST. 778 samples (31.8%) were Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture-positive. Compared to conventional MODS the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values (95% confidence intervals) of the MODS Kit were 99.3% (98.3-99.8%), 98.3% (97.5-98.8%), 95.8% (94.0-97.1%), and 99.7% (99.3-99.9%). Median (interquartile ranges) time to culture-positivity (and rifampicin and isoniazid DST) was 10 (9-13) days for conventional MODS and 8.5 (7-11) for MODS Kit (p〈0.01). Direct rifampicin and isoniazid DST in MODS kit was almost universally concordant with conventional MODS (97.9% agreement, 665/679 evaluable samples) and reference indirect DST (97.9% agreement, 687/702 evaluable samples). Conclusions: MODS kit delivers performance indistinguishable from conventional MODS and offers a convenient, affordable alternative with enhanced safety from the sealing silicone lid. The availability in the marketplace of this platform, which conforms to European standards (CE-marked), readily repurposed for second-line DST in the near future, provides a fresh opportunity for improving equity of access to TB diagnosis and first and second-line DST in settings where the need is greatest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere107258
JournalPloS one
Volume9
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 16 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A field evaluation of the Hardy TB MODS kit™ for the rapid phenotypic diagnosis of tuberculosis and multi-drug resistant tuberculosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Martin, L., Coronel, J., Faulx, D., Valdez, M., Metzler, M., Crudder, C., Castillo, E., Caviedes, L., Grandjean, L., Rodriguez, M., Friedland, J. S., Gilman, R. H., & Moore, D. A. J. (2014). A field evaluation of the Hardy TB MODS kit™ for the rapid phenotypic diagnosis of tuberculosis and multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. PloS one, 9(9), [e107258]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107258