A descriptive study of morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models: Results of the morbidity and mortality conference improvement study, Phase 1

Hanan Aboumatar, Charles G. Blackledge, Conan Dickson, Eugenie Heitmiller, Julie Freischlag, Peter J. Pronovost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to study morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models. Structured interviews with morbidity and mortality conference leaders of 12 (75%) clinical departments at Johns Hopkins Hospital were conducted. Reported morbidity and mortality conference goals included medical management (75%), teaching (58%), and patient safety and quality improvement (42%). Methods for case identification, selection, presentation, and analysis varied among departments. Morbidity and mortality conferences were attended mostly by physicians from the respective departments. One (8%) department had a standard approach for eliciting input from all providers on the case, another (8%) used a structured tool to explore underlying system factors, and 7 (58%) departments had a plan for assigning follow-up on recommendations. There is wide variation in how morbidity and mortality conferences are conducted across departments and little conformity to known models for analyzing medical incidents. Models for best practices in conducting morbidity and mortality conferences are needed. (Am J Med Qual 2007; 22:232-238).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)232-238
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

Morbidity
Mortality
Patient Safety
Quality Improvement
Practice Guidelines
Teaching
Interviews
Physicians

Keywords

  • Case analysis
  • Health care quality improvement
  • Medical education
  • Medical error
  • Mortality morbidity conference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

A descriptive study of morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models : Results of the morbidity and mortality conference improvement study, Phase 1. / Aboumatar, Hanan; Blackledge, Charles G.; Dickson, Conan; Heitmiller, Eugenie; Freischlag, Julie; Pronovost, Peter J.

In: American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 22, No. 4, 07.2007, p. 232-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ba05f9ff0a094f8cbf204cdd267e0483,
title = "A descriptive study of morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models: Results of the morbidity and mortality conference improvement study, Phase 1",
abstract = "The purpose of this article is to study morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models. Structured interviews with morbidity and mortality conference leaders of 12 (75{\%}) clinical departments at Johns Hopkins Hospital were conducted. Reported morbidity and mortality conference goals included medical management (75{\%}), teaching (58{\%}), and patient safety and quality improvement (42{\%}). Methods for case identification, selection, presentation, and analysis varied among departments. Morbidity and mortality conferences were attended mostly by physicians from the respective departments. One (8{\%}) department had a standard approach for eliciting input from all providers on the case, another (8{\%}) used a structured tool to explore underlying system factors, and 7 (58{\%}) departments had a plan for assigning follow-up on recommendations. There is wide variation in how morbidity and mortality conferences are conducted across departments and little conformity to known models for analyzing medical incidents. Models for best practices in conducting morbidity and mortality conferences are needed. (Am J Med Qual 2007; 22:232-238).",
keywords = "Case analysis, Health care quality improvement, Medical education, Medical error, Mortality morbidity conference",
author = "Hanan Aboumatar and Blackledge, {Charles G.} and Conan Dickson and Eugenie Heitmiller and Julie Freischlag and Pronovost, {Peter J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/1062860607303292",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "232--238",
journal = "American Journal of Medical Quality",
issn = "1062-8606",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A descriptive study of morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models

T2 - Results of the morbidity and mortality conference improvement study, Phase 1

AU - Aboumatar, Hanan

AU - Blackledge, Charles G.

AU - Dickson, Conan

AU - Heitmiller, Eugenie

AU - Freischlag, Julie

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - The purpose of this article is to study morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models. Structured interviews with morbidity and mortality conference leaders of 12 (75%) clinical departments at Johns Hopkins Hospital were conducted. Reported morbidity and mortality conference goals included medical management (75%), teaching (58%), and patient safety and quality improvement (42%). Methods for case identification, selection, presentation, and analysis varied among departments. Morbidity and mortality conferences were attended mostly by physicians from the respective departments. One (8%) department had a standard approach for eliciting input from all providers on the case, another (8%) used a structured tool to explore underlying system factors, and 7 (58%) departments had a plan for assigning follow-up on recommendations. There is wide variation in how morbidity and mortality conferences are conducted across departments and little conformity to known models for analyzing medical incidents. Models for best practices in conducting morbidity and mortality conferences are needed. (Am J Med Qual 2007; 22:232-238).

AB - The purpose of this article is to study morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models. Structured interviews with morbidity and mortality conference leaders of 12 (75%) clinical departments at Johns Hopkins Hospital were conducted. Reported morbidity and mortality conference goals included medical management (75%), teaching (58%), and patient safety and quality improvement (42%). Methods for case identification, selection, presentation, and analysis varied among departments. Morbidity and mortality conferences were attended mostly by physicians from the respective departments. One (8%) department had a standard approach for eliciting input from all providers on the case, another (8%) used a structured tool to explore underlying system factors, and 7 (58%) departments had a plan for assigning follow-up on recommendations. There is wide variation in how morbidity and mortality conferences are conducted across departments and little conformity to known models for analyzing medical incidents. Models for best practices in conducting morbidity and mortality conferences are needed. (Am J Med Qual 2007; 22:232-238).

KW - Case analysis

KW - Health care quality improvement

KW - Medical education

KW - Medical error

KW - Mortality morbidity conference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547491733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547491733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1062860607303292

DO - 10.1177/1062860607303292

M3 - Article

C2 - 17656727

AN - SCOPUS:34547491733

VL - 22

SP - 232

EP - 238

JO - American Journal of Medical Quality

JF - American Journal of Medical Quality

SN - 1062-8606

IS - 4

ER -