A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy.

M. S. Komrad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

All illness represents a state of diminished autonomy and therefore the doctor-patient relationship necessarily and justifiably involves a degree of medical paternalism argues the author, an American medical student. In a broad-ranging paper he discusses the concepts of autonomy and paternalism in the context of the doctor-patient relationship. Given the necessary diminution of autonomy which illness inflicts, a limited form of medical paternalism, aimed at restoring or maximising the patient's autonomy is entirely acceptable, and indeed fundamental to the relationship he argues. However, the exercise of this paternalism should be flexible and related to the current 'level of autonomy' of the patient himself. An editorial in this issue comments briefly on this paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)38-44
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of medical ethics
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1983
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this