A Data-Driven Approach to the Management of Accommodative Esotropia

Ashvini Reddy, Cary H. Freeman, Evelyn A. Paysse, David K. Coats

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if key findings on initial examination are predictive of ability to achieve and maintain functional alignment (residual esotropia of less than 8 prism diopters) with single-vision spectacles, bifocals, or surgery in children with accommodative esotropia. Design: Retrospective, observational case series. Methods: Institutional review of 68 consecutive accommodative esotropia patients. Exclusion criteria included previous spectacles use, other ocular pathologic features or surgery, or follow-up of less than 2 years. The main outcome measure was the ability to achieve functional alignment. Results: Mean age at the time of single-vision spectacle prescription (P = .02), mean cycloplegic refractive error (P = .016), amblyopia (P = .02), uncorrected near deviation (P <.001), and uncorrected distance deviation (P <.001) differed significantly between children who achieved functional alignment with single-vision lenses and those who did not. The most parsimonious prediction model revealed that presence of amblyopia (P = .113; odds ratio [OR], 0.138; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.012 to 1.59), uncorrected distance deviation (P = .004; OR, 1.156; 95% CI, 1.049 to 1.274), mean cycloplegic refractive error (P = .008; OR, 0.300; 95% CI, 0.123 to 0.732), and age at time of single-vision lens prescription (P = .007; OR, 0.259; 95% CI, 0.097 to 0.690) were the best predictors of ability to achieve orthotropia with single-vision spectacles with a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI, 71% to 99%) and specificity of 91% (95% CI, 75% to 98%). Conclusions: Significant differences exist in the clinical presentations of children who achieve functional orthotropia with single-vision spectacles and those who require bifocals or surgery. An evidence-based algorithm may help practitioners predict which intervention is most likely to benefit an individual child.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)466-470
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume148
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Esotropia
Confidence Intervals
Aptitude
Odds Ratio
Mydriatics
Amblyopia
Refractive Errors
Lenses
Prescriptions
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

A Data-Driven Approach to the Management of Accommodative Esotropia. / Reddy, Ashvini; Freeman, Cary H.; Paysse, Evelyn A.; Coats, David K.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 148, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 466-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reddy, Ashvini ; Freeman, Cary H. ; Paysse, Evelyn A. ; Coats, David K. / A Data-Driven Approach to the Management of Accommodative Esotropia. In: American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009 ; Vol. 148, No. 3. pp. 466-470.
@article{6102356811be4ef08d95cb016168ae9a,
title = "A Data-Driven Approach to the Management of Accommodative Esotropia",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine if key findings on initial examination are predictive of ability to achieve and maintain functional alignment (residual esotropia of less than 8 prism diopters) with single-vision spectacles, bifocals, or surgery in children with accommodative esotropia. Design: Retrospective, observational case series. Methods: Institutional review of 68 consecutive accommodative esotropia patients. Exclusion criteria included previous spectacles use, other ocular pathologic features or surgery, or follow-up of less than 2 years. The main outcome measure was the ability to achieve functional alignment. Results: Mean age at the time of single-vision spectacle prescription (P = .02), mean cycloplegic refractive error (P = .016), amblyopia (P = .02), uncorrected near deviation (P <.001), and uncorrected distance deviation (P <.001) differed significantly between children who achieved functional alignment with single-vision lenses and those who did not. The most parsimonious prediction model revealed that presence of amblyopia (P = .113; odds ratio [OR], 0.138; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 0.012 to 1.59), uncorrected distance deviation (P = .004; OR, 1.156; 95{\%} CI, 1.049 to 1.274), mean cycloplegic refractive error (P = .008; OR, 0.300; 95{\%} CI, 0.123 to 0.732), and age at time of single-vision lens prescription (P = .007; OR, 0.259; 95{\%} CI, 0.097 to 0.690) were the best predictors of ability to achieve orthotropia with single-vision spectacles with a sensitivity of 94{\%} (95{\%} CI, 71{\%} to 99{\%}) and specificity of 91{\%} (95{\%} CI, 75{\%} to 98{\%}). Conclusions: Significant differences exist in the clinical presentations of children who achieve functional orthotropia with single-vision spectacles and those who require bifocals or surgery. An evidence-based algorithm may help practitioners predict which intervention is most likely to benefit an individual child.",
author = "Ashvini Reddy and Freeman, {Cary H.} and Paysse, {Evelyn A.} and Coats, {David K.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2009.03.032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "148",
pages = "466--470",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Data-Driven Approach to the Management of Accommodative Esotropia

AU - Reddy, Ashvini

AU - Freeman, Cary H.

AU - Paysse, Evelyn A.

AU - Coats, David K.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Purpose: To determine if key findings on initial examination are predictive of ability to achieve and maintain functional alignment (residual esotropia of less than 8 prism diopters) with single-vision spectacles, bifocals, or surgery in children with accommodative esotropia. Design: Retrospective, observational case series. Methods: Institutional review of 68 consecutive accommodative esotropia patients. Exclusion criteria included previous spectacles use, other ocular pathologic features or surgery, or follow-up of less than 2 years. The main outcome measure was the ability to achieve functional alignment. Results: Mean age at the time of single-vision spectacle prescription (P = .02), mean cycloplegic refractive error (P = .016), amblyopia (P = .02), uncorrected near deviation (P <.001), and uncorrected distance deviation (P <.001) differed significantly between children who achieved functional alignment with single-vision lenses and those who did not. The most parsimonious prediction model revealed that presence of amblyopia (P = .113; odds ratio [OR], 0.138; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.012 to 1.59), uncorrected distance deviation (P = .004; OR, 1.156; 95% CI, 1.049 to 1.274), mean cycloplegic refractive error (P = .008; OR, 0.300; 95% CI, 0.123 to 0.732), and age at time of single-vision lens prescription (P = .007; OR, 0.259; 95% CI, 0.097 to 0.690) were the best predictors of ability to achieve orthotropia with single-vision spectacles with a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI, 71% to 99%) and specificity of 91% (95% CI, 75% to 98%). Conclusions: Significant differences exist in the clinical presentations of children who achieve functional orthotropia with single-vision spectacles and those who require bifocals or surgery. An evidence-based algorithm may help practitioners predict which intervention is most likely to benefit an individual child.

AB - Purpose: To determine if key findings on initial examination are predictive of ability to achieve and maintain functional alignment (residual esotropia of less than 8 prism diopters) with single-vision spectacles, bifocals, or surgery in children with accommodative esotropia. Design: Retrospective, observational case series. Methods: Institutional review of 68 consecutive accommodative esotropia patients. Exclusion criteria included previous spectacles use, other ocular pathologic features or surgery, or follow-up of less than 2 years. The main outcome measure was the ability to achieve functional alignment. Results: Mean age at the time of single-vision spectacle prescription (P = .02), mean cycloplegic refractive error (P = .016), amblyopia (P = .02), uncorrected near deviation (P <.001), and uncorrected distance deviation (P <.001) differed significantly between children who achieved functional alignment with single-vision lenses and those who did not. The most parsimonious prediction model revealed that presence of amblyopia (P = .113; odds ratio [OR], 0.138; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.012 to 1.59), uncorrected distance deviation (P = .004; OR, 1.156; 95% CI, 1.049 to 1.274), mean cycloplegic refractive error (P = .008; OR, 0.300; 95% CI, 0.123 to 0.732), and age at time of single-vision lens prescription (P = .007; OR, 0.259; 95% CI, 0.097 to 0.690) were the best predictors of ability to achieve orthotropia with single-vision spectacles with a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI, 71% to 99%) and specificity of 91% (95% CI, 75% to 98%). Conclusions: Significant differences exist in the clinical presentations of children who achieve functional orthotropia with single-vision spectacles and those who require bifocals or surgery. An evidence-based algorithm may help practitioners predict which intervention is most likely to benefit an individual child.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68949084914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68949084914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.03.032

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.03.032

M3 - Article

C2 - 19464667

AN - SCOPUS:68949084914

VL - 148

SP - 466

EP - 470

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 3

ER -