A cross-sectional prevalence study of ethnically targeted and general audience outdoor obesity-related advertising

Antronette K. Yancey, Brian L. Cole, Rochelle Brown, Jerome D. Williams, Amy Hillier, Randolph S. Kline, Marice Ashe, Sonya A. Grier, Desiree Backman, William J. McCarthy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: Commercial marketing is a critical but understudied element of the sociocultural environment influencing Americans' food and beverage preferences and purchases. This marketing also likely influences the utilization of goods and services related to physical activity and sedentary behavior. A growing literature documents the targeting of racial/ethnic and income groups in commercial advertisements in magazines, on billboards, and on television that may contribute to sociodemographic disparities in obesity and chronic disease risk and protective behaviors. This article examines whether African Americans, Latinos, and people living in low-income neighborhoods are disproportionately exposed to advertisements for high-calorie, low nutrient-dense foods and beverages and for sedentary entertainment and transportation and are relatively underexposed to advertising for nutritious foods and beverages and goods and services promoting physical activities. Methods: Outdoor advertising density and content were compared in zip code areas selected to offer contrasts by area income and ethnicity in four cities: Los Angeles, Austin, New York City, and Philadelphia. Findings: Large variations were observed in the amount, type, and value of advertising in the selected zip code areas. Living in an upper-income neighborhood, regardless of its residents' predominant ethnicity, is generally protective against exposure to most types of obesity-promoting outdoor advertising (food, fast food, sugary beverages, sedentary entertainment, and transportation). The density of advertising varied by zip code area race/ethnicity, with African American zip code areas having the highest advertising densities, Latino zip code areas having slightly lower densities, and white zip code areas having the lowest densities. Conclusions: The potential health and economic implications of differential exposure to obesity-related advertising are substantial. Although substantive legal questions remain about the government's ability to regulate advertising, the success of limiting tobacco advertising offers lessons for reducing the marketing contribution to the obesigenicity of urban environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-184
Number of pages30
JournalMilbank Quarterly
Volume87
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Obesity
Cross-Sectional Studies
Food and Beverages
Marketing
Hispanic Americans
African Americans
Exercise
Food Services
Fast Foods
Food Preferences
Food
Aptitude
Los Angeles
Television
Risk-Taking
Ethnic Groups
Tobacco
Chronic Disease
Economics
Health

Keywords

  • African American
  • Black
  • Disparities
  • Hispanic
  • Latino
  • Marketing
  • Minority
  • Policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Yancey, A. K., Cole, B. L., Brown, R., Williams, J. D., Hillier, A., Kline, R. S., ... McCarthy, W. J. (2009). A cross-sectional prevalence study of ethnically targeted and general audience outdoor obesity-related advertising. Milbank Quarterly, 87(1), 155-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00551.x

A cross-sectional prevalence study of ethnically targeted and general audience outdoor obesity-related advertising. / Yancey, Antronette K.; Cole, Brian L.; Brown, Rochelle; Williams, Jerome D.; Hillier, Amy; Kline, Randolph S.; Ashe, Marice; Grier, Sonya A.; Backman, Desiree; McCarthy, William J.

In: Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 87, No. 1, 03.2009, p. 155-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yancey, AK, Cole, BL, Brown, R, Williams, JD, Hillier, A, Kline, RS, Ashe, M, Grier, SA, Backman, D & McCarthy, WJ 2009, 'A cross-sectional prevalence study of ethnically targeted and general audience outdoor obesity-related advertising', Milbank Quarterly, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 155-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00551.x
Yancey, Antronette K. ; Cole, Brian L. ; Brown, Rochelle ; Williams, Jerome D. ; Hillier, Amy ; Kline, Randolph S. ; Ashe, Marice ; Grier, Sonya A. ; Backman, Desiree ; McCarthy, William J. / A cross-sectional prevalence study of ethnically targeted and general audience outdoor obesity-related advertising. In: Milbank Quarterly. 2009 ; Vol. 87, No. 1. pp. 155-184.
@article{9ff8a6c331224a63b18ee79572a1dc5c,
title = "A cross-sectional prevalence study of ethnically targeted and general audience outdoor obesity-related advertising",
abstract = "Context: Commercial marketing is a critical but understudied element of the sociocultural environment influencing Americans' food and beverage preferences and purchases. This marketing also likely influences the utilization of goods and services related to physical activity and sedentary behavior. A growing literature documents the targeting of racial/ethnic and income groups in commercial advertisements in magazines, on billboards, and on television that may contribute to sociodemographic disparities in obesity and chronic disease risk and protective behaviors. This article examines whether African Americans, Latinos, and people living in low-income neighborhoods are disproportionately exposed to advertisements for high-calorie, low nutrient-dense foods and beverages and for sedentary entertainment and transportation and are relatively underexposed to advertising for nutritious foods and beverages and goods and services promoting physical activities. Methods: Outdoor advertising density and content were compared in zip code areas selected to offer contrasts by area income and ethnicity in four cities: Los Angeles, Austin, New York City, and Philadelphia. Findings: Large variations were observed in the amount, type, and value of advertising in the selected zip code areas. Living in an upper-income neighborhood, regardless of its residents' predominant ethnicity, is generally protective against exposure to most types of obesity-promoting outdoor advertising (food, fast food, sugary beverages, sedentary entertainment, and transportation). The density of advertising varied by zip code area race/ethnicity, with African American zip code areas having the highest advertising densities, Latino zip code areas having slightly lower densities, and white zip code areas having the lowest densities. Conclusions: The potential health and economic implications of differential exposure to obesity-related advertising are substantial. Although substantive legal questions remain about the government's ability to regulate advertising, the success of limiting tobacco advertising offers lessons for reducing the marketing contribution to the obesigenicity of urban environments.",
keywords = "African American, Black, Disparities, Hispanic, Latino, Marketing, Minority, Policy",
author = "Yancey, {Antronette K.} and Cole, {Brian L.} and Rochelle Brown and Williams, {Jerome D.} and Amy Hillier and Kline, {Randolph S.} and Marice Ashe and Grier, {Sonya A.} and Desiree Backman and McCarthy, {William J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00551.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "155--184",
journal = "Milbank Quarterly",
issn = "0887-378X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cross-sectional prevalence study of ethnically targeted and general audience outdoor obesity-related advertising

AU - Yancey, Antronette K.

AU - Cole, Brian L.

AU - Brown, Rochelle

AU - Williams, Jerome D.

AU - Hillier, Amy

AU - Kline, Randolph S.

AU - Ashe, Marice

AU - Grier, Sonya A.

AU - Backman, Desiree

AU - McCarthy, William J.

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Context: Commercial marketing is a critical but understudied element of the sociocultural environment influencing Americans' food and beverage preferences and purchases. This marketing also likely influences the utilization of goods and services related to physical activity and sedentary behavior. A growing literature documents the targeting of racial/ethnic and income groups in commercial advertisements in magazines, on billboards, and on television that may contribute to sociodemographic disparities in obesity and chronic disease risk and protective behaviors. This article examines whether African Americans, Latinos, and people living in low-income neighborhoods are disproportionately exposed to advertisements for high-calorie, low nutrient-dense foods and beverages and for sedentary entertainment and transportation and are relatively underexposed to advertising for nutritious foods and beverages and goods and services promoting physical activities. Methods: Outdoor advertising density and content were compared in zip code areas selected to offer contrasts by area income and ethnicity in four cities: Los Angeles, Austin, New York City, and Philadelphia. Findings: Large variations were observed in the amount, type, and value of advertising in the selected zip code areas. Living in an upper-income neighborhood, regardless of its residents' predominant ethnicity, is generally protective against exposure to most types of obesity-promoting outdoor advertising (food, fast food, sugary beverages, sedentary entertainment, and transportation). The density of advertising varied by zip code area race/ethnicity, with African American zip code areas having the highest advertising densities, Latino zip code areas having slightly lower densities, and white zip code areas having the lowest densities. Conclusions: The potential health and economic implications of differential exposure to obesity-related advertising are substantial. Although substantive legal questions remain about the government's ability to regulate advertising, the success of limiting tobacco advertising offers lessons for reducing the marketing contribution to the obesigenicity of urban environments.

AB - Context: Commercial marketing is a critical but understudied element of the sociocultural environment influencing Americans' food and beverage preferences and purchases. This marketing also likely influences the utilization of goods and services related to physical activity and sedentary behavior. A growing literature documents the targeting of racial/ethnic and income groups in commercial advertisements in magazines, on billboards, and on television that may contribute to sociodemographic disparities in obesity and chronic disease risk and protective behaviors. This article examines whether African Americans, Latinos, and people living in low-income neighborhoods are disproportionately exposed to advertisements for high-calorie, low nutrient-dense foods and beverages and for sedentary entertainment and transportation and are relatively underexposed to advertising for nutritious foods and beverages and goods and services promoting physical activities. Methods: Outdoor advertising density and content were compared in zip code areas selected to offer contrasts by area income and ethnicity in four cities: Los Angeles, Austin, New York City, and Philadelphia. Findings: Large variations were observed in the amount, type, and value of advertising in the selected zip code areas. Living in an upper-income neighborhood, regardless of its residents' predominant ethnicity, is generally protective against exposure to most types of obesity-promoting outdoor advertising (food, fast food, sugary beverages, sedentary entertainment, and transportation). The density of advertising varied by zip code area race/ethnicity, with African American zip code areas having the highest advertising densities, Latino zip code areas having slightly lower densities, and white zip code areas having the lowest densities. Conclusions: The potential health and economic implications of differential exposure to obesity-related advertising are substantial. Although substantive legal questions remain about the government's ability to regulate advertising, the success of limiting tobacco advertising offers lessons for reducing the marketing contribution to the obesigenicity of urban environments.

KW - African American

KW - Black

KW - Disparities

KW - Hispanic

KW - Latino

KW - Marketing

KW - Minority

KW - Policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61949420950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61949420950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00551.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00551.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19298419

AN - SCOPUS:61949420950

VL - 87

SP - 155

EP - 184

JO - Milbank Quarterly

JF - Milbank Quarterly

SN - 0887-378X

IS - 1

ER -