A critical inventory of preoperative skull replicas

Jean H D Fasel, J. Beinemann, K. Schaller, Philippe Gailloud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Physical replicas of organs are used increasingly for preoperative planning. The quality of these models is generally accepted by surgeons. In view of the strong trend towards minimally invasive and personalised surgery, however, the aim of this investigation was to assess qualitatively the accuracy of such replicas, using skull models as an example. METHODS Skull imaging was acquired for three cadavers by computed tomography using clinical routine parameters. After digital three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, physical replicas were produced by 3D printing. The facsimilia were analysed systematically and compared with the best gold standard possible: the macerated skull itself. RESULTS The skull models were far from anatomically accurate. Non-conforming rendering was observed in particular for foramina, sutures, notches, fissures, grooves, channels, tuberosities, thin-walled structures, sharp peaks and crests, and teeth. CONCLUSIONS Surgeons should be aware that preoperative models may not yet render the exact anatomy of the patient under consideration and are advised to continue relying, in specific conditions, on their own analysis of the native computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-404
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
Volume95
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Skull
Equipment and Supplies
Tomography
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Cadaver
Sutures
Anatomy
Tooth
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Anatomy
  • Preoperative replicas
  • Skull
  • Surgical planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A critical inventory of preoperative skull replicas. / Fasel, Jean H D; Beinemann, J.; Schaller, K.; Gailloud, Philippe.

In: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, Vol. 95, No. 6, 2013, p. 401-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fasel, Jean H D ; Beinemann, J. ; Schaller, K. ; Gailloud, Philippe. / A critical inventory of preoperative skull replicas. In: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2013 ; Vol. 95, No. 6. pp. 401-404.
@article{7858397521354de396ffa68b5ea90b6c,
title = "A critical inventory of preoperative skull replicas",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION Physical replicas of organs are used increasingly for preoperative planning. The quality of these models is generally accepted by surgeons. In view of the strong trend towards minimally invasive and personalised surgery, however, the aim of this investigation was to assess qualitatively the accuracy of such replicas, using skull models as an example. METHODS Skull imaging was acquired for three cadavers by computed tomography using clinical routine parameters. After digital three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, physical replicas were produced by 3D printing. The facsimilia were analysed systematically and compared with the best gold standard possible: the macerated skull itself. RESULTS The skull models were far from anatomically accurate. Non-conforming rendering was observed in particular for foramina, sutures, notches, fissures, grooves, channels, tuberosities, thin-walled structures, sharp peaks and crests, and teeth. CONCLUSIONS Surgeons should be aware that preoperative models may not yet render the exact anatomy of the patient under consideration and are advised to continue relying, in specific conditions, on their own analysis of the native computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.",
keywords = "Anatomy, Preoperative replicas, Skull, Surgical planning",
author = "Fasel, {Jean H D} and J. Beinemann and K. Schaller and Philippe Gailloud",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1308/003588413X13629960046994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "401--404",
journal = "Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England",
issn = "0035-8843",
publisher = "Royal College of Surgeons of England",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical inventory of preoperative skull replicas

AU - Fasel, Jean H D

AU - Beinemann, J.

AU - Schaller, K.

AU - Gailloud, Philippe

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - INTRODUCTION Physical replicas of organs are used increasingly for preoperative planning. The quality of these models is generally accepted by surgeons. In view of the strong trend towards minimally invasive and personalised surgery, however, the aim of this investigation was to assess qualitatively the accuracy of such replicas, using skull models as an example. METHODS Skull imaging was acquired for three cadavers by computed tomography using clinical routine parameters. After digital three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, physical replicas were produced by 3D printing. The facsimilia were analysed systematically and compared with the best gold standard possible: the macerated skull itself. RESULTS The skull models were far from anatomically accurate. Non-conforming rendering was observed in particular for foramina, sutures, notches, fissures, grooves, channels, tuberosities, thin-walled structures, sharp peaks and crests, and teeth. CONCLUSIONS Surgeons should be aware that preoperative models may not yet render the exact anatomy of the patient under consideration and are advised to continue relying, in specific conditions, on their own analysis of the native computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

AB - INTRODUCTION Physical replicas of organs are used increasingly for preoperative planning. The quality of these models is generally accepted by surgeons. In view of the strong trend towards minimally invasive and personalised surgery, however, the aim of this investigation was to assess qualitatively the accuracy of such replicas, using skull models as an example. METHODS Skull imaging was acquired for three cadavers by computed tomography using clinical routine parameters. After digital three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, physical replicas were produced by 3D printing. The facsimilia were analysed systematically and compared with the best gold standard possible: the macerated skull itself. RESULTS The skull models were far from anatomically accurate. Non-conforming rendering was observed in particular for foramina, sutures, notches, fissures, grooves, channels, tuberosities, thin-walled structures, sharp peaks and crests, and teeth. CONCLUSIONS Surgeons should be aware that preoperative models may not yet render the exact anatomy of the patient under consideration and are advised to continue relying, in specific conditions, on their own analysis of the native computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

KW - Anatomy

KW - Preoperative replicas

KW - Skull

KW - Surgical planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886387502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886387502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1308/003588413X13629960046994

DO - 10.1308/003588413X13629960046994

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 401

EP - 404

JO - Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

JF - Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

SN - 0035-8843

IS - 6

ER -