A cost minimization analysis of occupational therapy discharge planning for older adults: the HOME randomized controlled trial

Kylie Wales, Glenn Salkeld, Lindy Clemson, Natasha A. Lannin, Laura N Gitlin, Laurence Rubenstein, Kirsten Howard, Martin Howell, Ian D. Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To compare the cost effectiveness of two occupational therapy–led discharge planning interventions from the HOME trial. Design: An economic evaluation was conducted within the superiority randomized HOME trial to assess the difference in costs and health-related outcomes associated with the enhanced program and the in-hospital consultation. Total costs of health and community service utilization were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, activities of daily living and quality-adjusted life years. Setting: Medical and acute care wards of Australian hospitals (n=5). Subjects: A total of 400 people ≥ 70 years of age. Interventions: Participants were randomized to either (1) an enhanced program (HOME), involving pre/post discharge visits and two follow-up phone calls, or (2) an in-hospital consultation using the home and community environment assessment and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessment. Main measures: Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (global measure of activities of daily living) and SF-12V2, transformed into SF-6D (quality-adjusted life year) measured at baseline and three months post discharge. Results: The cost of the enhanced program was higher than that of the in-hospital consultation. However, a higher proportion of patients showed improvement in activities of daily living in the enhanced program with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $61,906.00 per person with clinically meaningful improvement. Conclusion: Health services would not save money by implementing the enhanced program as a routine intervention in medical and acute care wards. Future research should incorporate longer time horizons and consider which patient groups would benefit from home visits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Patient Discharge
Occupational Therapy
Activities of Daily Living
Randomized Controlled Trials
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Referral and Consultation
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Health Services
House Calls
Social Welfare
Health Care Costs

Keywords

  • economic evaluation
  • occupational therapy
  • Older adults

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

A cost minimization analysis of occupational therapy discharge planning for older adults : the HOME randomized controlled trial. / Wales, Kylie; Salkeld, Glenn; Clemson, Lindy; Lannin, Natasha A.; Gitlin, Laura N; Rubenstein, Laurence; Howard, Kirsten; Howell, Martin; Cameron, Ian D.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, 01.03.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wales, Kylie ; Salkeld, Glenn ; Clemson, Lindy ; Lannin, Natasha A. ; Gitlin, Laura N ; Rubenstein, Laurence ; Howard, Kirsten ; Howell, Martin ; Cameron, Ian D. / A cost minimization analysis of occupational therapy discharge planning for older adults : the HOME randomized controlled trial. In: Clinical Rehabilitation. 2018.
@article{433a82659d8c45c28512f1ecc340210e,
title = "A cost minimization analysis of occupational therapy discharge planning for older adults: the HOME randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the cost effectiveness of two occupational therapy–led discharge planning interventions from the HOME trial. Design: An economic evaluation was conducted within the superiority randomized HOME trial to assess the difference in costs and health-related outcomes associated with the enhanced program and the in-hospital consultation. Total costs of health and community service utilization were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, activities of daily living and quality-adjusted life years. Setting: Medical and acute care wards of Australian hospitals (n=5). Subjects: A total of 400 people ≥ 70 years of age. Interventions: Participants were randomized to either (1) an enhanced program (HOME), involving pre/post discharge visits and two follow-up phone calls, or (2) an in-hospital consultation using the home and community environment assessment and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessment. Main measures: Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (global measure of activities of daily living) and SF-12V2, transformed into SF-6D (quality-adjusted life year) measured at baseline and three months post discharge. Results: The cost of the enhanced program was higher than that of the in-hospital consultation. However, a higher proportion of patients showed improvement in activities of daily living in the enhanced program with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $61,906.00 per person with clinically meaningful improvement. Conclusion: Health services would not save money by implementing the enhanced program as a routine intervention in medical and acute care wards. Future research should incorporate longer time horizons and consider which patient groups would benefit from home visits.",
keywords = "economic evaluation, occupational therapy, Older adults",
author = "Kylie Wales and Glenn Salkeld and Lindy Clemson and Lannin, {Natasha A.} and Gitlin, {Laura N} and Laurence Rubenstein and Kirsten Howard and Martin Howell and Cameron, {Ian D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269215518764249",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cost minimization analysis of occupational therapy discharge planning for older adults

T2 - the HOME randomized controlled trial

AU - Wales, Kylie

AU - Salkeld, Glenn

AU - Clemson, Lindy

AU - Lannin, Natasha A.

AU - Gitlin, Laura N

AU - Rubenstein, Laurence

AU - Howard, Kirsten

AU - Howell, Martin

AU - Cameron, Ian D.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the cost effectiveness of two occupational therapy–led discharge planning interventions from the HOME trial. Design: An economic evaluation was conducted within the superiority randomized HOME trial to assess the difference in costs and health-related outcomes associated with the enhanced program and the in-hospital consultation. Total costs of health and community service utilization were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, activities of daily living and quality-adjusted life years. Setting: Medical and acute care wards of Australian hospitals (n=5). Subjects: A total of 400 people ≥ 70 years of age. Interventions: Participants were randomized to either (1) an enhanced program (HOME), involving pre/post discharge visits and two follow-up phone calls, or (2) an in-hospital consultation using the home and community environment assessment and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessment. Main measures: Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (global measure of activities of daily living) and SF-12V2, transformed into SF-6D (quality-adjusted life year) measured at baseline and three months post discharge. Results: The cost of the enhanced program was higher than that of the in-hospital consultation. However, a higher proportion of patients showed improvement in activities of daily living in the enhanced program with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $61,906.00 per person with clinically meaningful improvement. Conclusion: Health services would not save money by implementing the enhanced program as a routine intervention in medical and acute care wards. Future research should incorporate longer time horizons and consider which patient groups would benefit from home visits.

AB - Objective: To compare the cost effectiveness of two occupational therapy–led discharge planning interventions from the HOME trial. Design: An economic evaluation was conducted within the superiority randomized HOME trial to assess the difference in costs and health-related outcomes associated with the enhanced program and the in-hospital consultation. Total costs of health and community service utilization were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, activities of daily living and quality-adjusted life years. Setting: Medical and acute care wards of Australian hospitals (n=5). Subjects: A total of 400 people ≥ 70 years of age. Interventions: Participants were randomized to either (1) an enhanced program (HOME), involving pre/post discharge visits and two follow-up phone calls, or (2) an in-hospital consultation using the home and community environment assessment and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessment. Main measures: Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (global measure of activities of daily living) and SF-12V2, transformed into SF-6D (quality-adjusted life year) measured at baseline and three months post discharge. Results: The cost of the enhanced program was higher than that of the in-hospital consultation. However, a higher proportion of patients showed improvement in activities of daily living in the enhanced program with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $61,906.00 per person with clinically meaningful improvement. Conclusion: Health services would not save money by implementing the enhanced program as a routine intervention in medical and acute care wards. Future research should incorporate longer time horizons and consider which patient groups would benefit from home visits.

KW - economic evaluation

KW - occupational therapy

KW - Older adults

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044605389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044605389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0269215518764249

DO - 10.1177/0269215518764249

M3 - Article

C2 - 29569470

AN - SCOPUS:85044605389

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

ER -