A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food.

S. R. Hursh, T. G. Raslear, D. Shurtleff, R. Bauman, L. Simmons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Laboratory studies of consumer demand theory require assumptions regarding the definition of price in the absence of a medium of exchange (money). In this study we test the proposition that the fundamental dimension of price is a cost-benefit ratio expressed as the effort expended per unit of food value consumed. Using rats as subjects, we tested the generality of this "unit price" concept by varying four dimensions of price: fixed-ratio schedule, number of food pellets per fixed-ratio completion, probability of reinforcement, and response lever weight or effort. Two levels of the last three factors were combined in a 2 x 2 x 2 design giving eight groups. Each group was studied under a series of six FR schedules. Using the nominal values of all factors to determine unit price, we found that grams of food consumed plotted as a function of unit price followed a single demand curve. Similarly, total work output (responses x effort) conformed to a single function when plotted in terms of unit price. These observations provided a template for interpreting the effects of biological factors, such as brain lesions or drugs, that might alter the cost-benefit ratio.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-440
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Volume50
Issue number3
StatePublished - Nov 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Food
Appointments and Schedules
Biological Factors
Weights and Measures
Brain
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Hursh, S. R., Raslear, T. G., Shurtleff, D., Bauman, R., & Simmons, L. (1988). A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50(3), 419-440.

A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. / Hursh, S. R.; Raslear, T. G.; Shurtleff, D.; Bauman, R.; Simmons, L.

In: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Vol. 50, No. 3, 11.1988, p. 419-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hursh, SR, Raslear, TG, Shurtleff, D, Bauman, R & Simmons, L 1988, 'A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food.', Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 419-440.
Hursh SR, Raslear TG, Shurtleff D, Bauman R, Simmons L. A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1988 Nov;50(3):419-440.
Hursh, S. R. ; Raslear, T. G. ; Shurtleff, D. ; Bauman, R. ; Simmons, L. / A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. In: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1988 ; Vol. 50, No. 3. pp. 419-440.
@article{ce1976f33f3d45bda03723c2c7a4c9dc,
title = "A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food.",
abstract = "Laboratory studies of consumer demand theory require assumptions regarding the definition of price in the absence of a medium of exchange (money). In this study we test the proposition that the fundamental dimension of price is a cost-benefit ratio expressed as the effort expended per unit of food value consumed. Using rats as subjects, we tested the generality of this {"}unit price{"} concept by varying four dimensions of price: fixed-ratio schedule, number of food pellets per fixed-ratio completion, probability of reinforcement, and response lever weight or effort. Two levels of the last three factors were combined in a 2 x 2 x 2 design giving eight groups. Each group was studied under a series of six FR schedules. Using the nominal values of all factors to determine unit price, we found that grams of food consumed plotted as a function of unit price followed a single demand curve. Similarly, total work output (responses x effort) conformed to a single function when plotted in terms of unit price. These observations provided a template for interpreting the effects of biological factors, such as brain lesions or drugs, that might alter the cost-benefit ratio.",
author = "Hursh, {S. R.} and Raslear, {T. G.} and D. Shurtleff and R. Bauman and L. Simmons",
year = "1988",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "419--440",
journal = "Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior",
issn = "0022-5002",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food.

AU - Hursh, S. R.

AU - Raslear, T. G.

AU - Shurtleff, D.

AU - Bauman, R.

AU - Simmons, L.

PY - 1988/11

Y1 - 1988/11

N2 - Laboratory studies of consumer demand theory require assumptions regarding the definition of price in the absence of a medium of exchange (money). In this study we test the proposition that the fundamental dimension of price is a cost-benefit ratio expressed as the effort expended per unit of food value consumed. Using rats as subjects, we tested the generality of this "unit price" concept by varying four dimensions of price: fixed-ratio schedule, number of food pellets per fixed-ratio completion, probability of reinforcement, and response lever weight or effort. Two levels of the last three factors were combined in a 2 x 2 x 2 design giving eight groups. Each group was studied under a series of six FR schedules. Using the nominal values of all factors to determine unit price, we found that grams of food consumed plotted as a function of unit price followed a single demand curve. Similarly, total work output (responses x effort) conformed to a single function when plotted in terms of unit price. These observations provided a template for interpreting the effects of biological factors, such as brain lesions or drugs, that might alter the cost-benefit ratio.

AB - Laboratory studies of consumer demand theory require assumptions regarding the definition of price in the absence of a medium of exchange (money). In this study we test the proposition that the fundamental dimension of price is a cost-benefit ratio expressed as the effort expended per unit of food value consumed. Using rats as subjects, we tested the generality of this "unit price" concept by varying four dimensions of price: fixed-ratio schedule, number of food pellets per fixed-ratio completion, probability of reinforcement, and response lever weight or effort. Two levels of the last three factors were combined in a 2 x 2 x 2 design giving eight groups. Each group was studied under a series of six FR schedules. Using the nominal values of all factors to determine unit price, we found that grams of food consumed plotted as a function of unit price followed a single demand curve. Similarly, total work output (responses x effort) conformed to a single function when plotted in terms of unit price. These observations provided a template for interpreting the effects of biological factors, such as brain lesions or drugs, that might alter the cost-benefit ratio.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024117647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024117647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3209958

AN - SCOPUS:0024117647

VL - 50

SP - 419

EP - 440

JO - Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

JF - Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

SN - 0022-5002

IS - 3

ER -