A comparison of strategies for facilitating smoking survey return in low-SES employees

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Antecedent-only and discriminated operant interventions were used to increase the return rate of surveys measuring smoking behavior and attitudes toward a smoke-free policy in low SES employees. Subjects in four groups were exposed to antecedent only interventions (Reduced Response Cost or Repeated Prompting) or discriminated operant interventions (Promised Punishment or Promised Reward). The discriminated operant interventions yielded a higher percentage of surveys returned, with the Promised Reward intervention resulting in the highest percentage of surveys returned (89.84%). These results are consistent with recent organizational behavior management research comparing the relative efficacy of antecedent interventions and discriminated operant interventions, as well as with research comparing the relative efficacy of behavior maintained by aversive and positively reinforcing contingencies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-59
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior Management
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 25 1991

Fingerprint

Smoking
Personnel
Reward
Smoke-Free Policy
Punishment
Smoke
Research
Costs and Cost Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Employees
Costs
Efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Applied Psychology
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

A comparison of strategies for facilitating smoking survey return in low-SES employees. / Hantula, Donald A.; Stillman, Frances A; Waranch, H. Richard.

In: Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, 25.01.1991, p. 47-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cf33a307f5ea4eacb7c02b255247f39b,
title = "A comparison of strategies for facilitating smoking survey return in low-SES employees",
abstract = "Antecedent-only and discriminated operant interventions were used to increase the return rate of surveys measuring smoking behavior and attitudes toward a smoke-free policy in low SES employees. Subjects in four groups were exposed to antecedent only interventions (Reduced Response Cost or Repeated Prompting) or discriminated operant interventions (Promised Punishment or Promised Reward). The discriminated operant interventions yielded a higher percentage of surveys returned, with the Promised Reward intervention resulting in the highest percentage of surveys returned (89.84{\%}). These results are consistent with recent organizational behavior management research comparing the relative efficacy of antecedent interventions and discriminated operant interventions, as well as with research comparing the relative efficacy of behavior maintained by aversive and positively reinforcing contingencies.",
author = "Hantula, {Donald A.} and Stillman, {Frances A} and Waranch, {H. Richard}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1300/J075v11n02_04",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "47--59",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Behavior Management",
issn = "0160-8061",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of strategies for facilitating smoking survey return in low-SES employees

AU - Hantula, Donald A.

AU - Stillman, Frances A

AU - Waranch, H. Richard

PY - 1991/1/25

Y1 - 1991/1/25

N2 - Antecedent-only and discriminated operant interventions were used to increase the return rate of surveys measuring smoking behavior and attitudes toward a smoke-free policy in low SES employees. Subjects in four groups were exposed to antecedent only interventions (Reduced Response Cost or Repeated Prompting) or discriminated operant interventions (Promised Punishment or Promised Reward). The discriminated operant interventions yielded a higher percentage of surveys returned, with the Promised Reward intervention resulting in the highest percentage of surveys returned (89.84%). These results are consistent with recent organizational behavior management research comparing the relative efficacy of antecedent interventions and discriminated operant interventions, as well as with research comparing the relative efficacy of behavior maintained by aversive and positively reinforcing contingencies.

AB - Antecedent-only and discriminated operant interventions were used to increase the return rate of surveys measuring smoking behavior and attitudes toward a smoke-free policy in low SES employees. Subjects in four groups were exposed to antecedent only interventions (Reduced Response Cost or Repeated Prompting) or discriminated operant interventions (Promised Punishment or Promised Reward). The discriminated operant interventions yielded a higher percentage of surveys returned, with the Promised Reward intervention resulting in the highest percentage of surveys returned (89.84%). These results are consistent with recent organizational behavior management research comparing the relative efficacy of antecedent interventions and discriminated operant interventions, as well as with research comparing the relative efficacy of behavior maintained by aversive and positively reinforcing contingencies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040930298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040930298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J075v11n02_04

DO - 10.1300/J075v11n02_04

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 47

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Organizational Behavior Management

JF - Journal of Organizational Behavior Management

SN - 0160-8061

IS - 2

ER -