A comparison of single- and multi-payer health insurance systems and options for reform

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A major choice confronting many countries is between single-payer and multi-payer health insurance systems. This paper compares single-payer models in the areas of revenue collection, risk pooling, purchasing, and social solidarity. Single-payer and multi-payer systems each have advantages which may meet countries' priorities for their health insurance system. Single-payer systems are usually financed more progressively, and rely on existing taxation systems; they effectively distribute risks throughout one large risk pool; and they offer governments a high degree of control over the total expenditure on health. Multi-payer systems sacrificce this control for a greater ability to meet the diverse preferences of beneficiaries. Several major reforms of single-payer insurance systems - expansion of the role of private insurance and transformation to a multi-payer system - are then described and illustrated using specific country examples. These reforms have been implemented with some success in several countries but face several important challenges.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-228
Number of pages14
JournalHealth Policy
Volume66
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

Single-Payer System
Health Insurance
Insurance
Taxes
Health Expenditures

Keywords

  • Health insurance systems
  • Health system reform
  • Multi-payer
  • Single-payer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy

Cite this

A comparison of single- and multi-payer health insurance systems and options for reform. / Hussey, P.; Anderson, Gerard F.

In: Health Policy, Vol. 66, No. 3, 12.2003, p. 215-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b0f70f1cb9d74fcc86b494a2b75b26d1,
title = "A comparison of single- and multi-payer health insurance systems and options for reform",
abstract = "A major choice confronting many countries is between single-payer and multi-payer health insurance systems. This paper compares single-payer models in the areas of revenue collection, risk pooling, purchasing, and social solidarity. Single-payer and multi-payer systems each have advantages which may meet countries' priorities for their health insurance system. Single-payer systems are usually financed more progressively, and rely on existing taxation systems; they effectively distribute risks throughout one large risk pool; and they offer governments a high degree of control over the total expenditure on health. Multi-payer systems sacrificce this control for a greater ability to meet the diverse preferences of beneficiaries. Several major reforms of single-payer insurance systems - expansion of the role of private insurance and transformation to a multi-payer system - are then described and illustrated using specific country examples. These reforms have been implemented with some success in several countries but face several important challenges.",
keywords = "Health insurance systems, Health system reform, Multi-payer, Single-payer",
author = "P. Hussey and Anderson, {Gerard F}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/S0168-8510(03)00050-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "215--228",
journal = "Health Policy",
issn = "0168-8510",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of single- and multi-payer health insurance systems and options for reform

AU - Hussey, P.

AU - Anderson, Gerard F

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - A major choice confronting many countries is between single-payer and multi-payer health insurance systems. This paper compares single-payer models in the areas of revenue collection, risk pooling, purchasing, and social solidarity. Single-payer and multi-payer systems each have advantages which may meet countries' priorities for their health insurance system. Single-payer systems are usually financed more progressively, and rely on existing taxation systems; they effectively distribute risks throughout one large risk pool; and they offer governments a high degree of control over the total expenditure on health. Multi-payer systems sacrificce this control for a greater ability to meet the diverse preferences of beneficiaries. Several major reforms of single-payer insurance systems - expansion of the role of private insurance and transformation to a multi-payer system - are then described and illustrated using specific country examples. These reforms have been implemented with some success in several countries but face several important challenges.

AB - A major choice confronting many countries is between single-payer and multi-payer health insurance systems. This paper compares single-payer models in the areas of revenue collection, risk pooling, purchasing, and social solidarity. Single-payer and multi-payer systems each have advantages which may meet countries' priorities for their health insurance system. Single-payer systems are usually financed more progressively, and rely on existing taxation systems; they effectively distribute risks throughout one large risk pool; and they offer governments a high degree of control over the total expenditure on health. Multi-payer systems sacrificce this control for a greater ability to meet the diverse preferences of beneficiaries. Several major reforms of single-payer insurance systems - expansion of the role of private insurance and transformation to a multi-payer system - are then described and illustrated using specific country examples. These reforms have been implemented with some success in several countries but face several important challenges.

KW - Health insurance systems

KW - Health system reform

KW - Multi-payer

KW - Single-payer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242551417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242551417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0168-8510(03)00050-2

DO - 10.1016/S0168-8510(03)00050-2

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 215

EP - 228

JO - Health Policy

JF - Health Policy

SN - 0168-8510

IS - 3

ER -