A Comparison of Reinforcement Based Treatment (RBT) versus RBT plus Recovery Housing (RBTRH)

Michelle Tuten, Julia M. Shadur, Maxine Stitzer, Hendrée E. Jones

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

Objectives Reinforcement-based treatment (RBT) plus recovery housing (RBTRH) improves outcomes for individuals with opioid use disorders. No studies have examined the efficacy of RBT in the absence of abstinent-contingent housing. Methods We compared highly similar participants from a study of outpatient RBT (RBT, n = 55) and the RBTRH (n = 80) arm of a randomized trial wherein participants received abstinent-contingent payment for recovery housing sponsored by the research program. Abstinence and employment outcomes were assessed at one, three, and six months. Regression was used to identify predictors of abstinence. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of housing on outcomes. Results RBT and RBTRH participants had similar abstinence and employment outcomes. Predictors of abstinence in the sample included recovery housing residence and employment. However, a distinct RBT sub-group emerged, as 33% of the sample accessed self-pay RH (RBTSPRH). Sensitivity analyses compared the two RH groups (self-pay and program-supported) to RBT outpatient treatment (RBT). The RBTSPRH and RBTRH groups had similar abstinence outcomes, and both groups had superior abstinence outcomes compared to RBT. The RBTSPRH group had the most sustained effects relative to RBT, including higher abstinence rates, and more favorable employment outcomes at six months (ps < .05). The RBTSPRH group reported more days of employment compared to both the RBT and RBTRH groups at three months (ps < .05). Conclusions Findings highlight the importance of recovery housing for promoting improved outcomes among RBT participants. Research is needed to explore the aspects of recovery housing versus outpatient treatment that are associated with improved outcomes in the population.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages48-55
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume72
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Therapeutics
Outpatients
Research

Keywords

  • Cocaine use
  • Opioid use
  • Treatment outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Phychiatric Mental Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

A Comparison of Reinforcement Based Treatment (RBT) versus RBT plus Recovery Housing (RBTRH). / Tuten, Michelle; Shadur, Julia M.; Stitzer, Maxine; Jones, Hendrée E.

In: Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Vol. 72, 01.01.2017, p. 48-55.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

@article{43ea675a3c1b471a97eab080735bb89a,
title = "A Comparison of Reinforcement Based Treatment (RBT) versus RBT plus Recovery Housing (RBTRH)",
abstract = "Objectives Reinforcement-based treatment (RBT) plus recovery housing (RBTRH) improves outcomes for individuals with opioid use disorders. No studies have examined the efficacy of RBT in the absence of abstinent-contingent housing. Methods We compared highly similar participants from a study of outpatient RBT (RBT, n = 55) and the RBTRH (n = 80) arm of a randomized trial wherein participants received abstinent-contingent payment for recovery housing sponsored by the research program. Abstinence and employment outcomes were assessed at one, three, and six months. Regression was used to identify predictors of abstinence. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of housing on outcomes. Results RBT and RBTRH participants had similar abstinence and employment outcomes. Predictors of abstinence in the sample included recovery housing residence and employment. However, a distinct RBT sub-group emerged, as 33% of the sample accessed self-pay RH (RBTSPRH). Sensitivity analyses compared the two RH groups (self-pay and program-supported) to RBT outpatient treatment (RBT). The RBTSPRH and RBTRH groups had similar abstinence outcomes, and both groups had superior abstinence outcomes compared to RBT. The RBTSPRH group had the most sustained effects relative to RBT, including higher abstinence rates, and more favorable employment outcomes at six months (ps < .05). The RBTSPRH group reported more days of employment compared to both the RBT and RBTRH groups at three months (ps < .05). Conclusions Findings highlight the importance of recovery housing for promoting improved outcomes among RBT participants. Research is needed to explore the aspects of recovery housing versus outpatient treatment that are associated with improved outcomes in the population.",
keywords = "Cocaine use, Opioid use, Treatment outcomes",
author = "Michelle Tuten and Shadur, {Julia M.} and Maxine Stitzer and Jones, {Hendrée E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsat.2016.09.001",
volume = "72",
pages = "48--55",
journal = "Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment",
issn = "0740-5472",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Reinforcement Based Treatment (RBT) versus RBT plus Recovery Housing (RBTRH)

AU - Tuten,Michelle

AU - Shadur,Julia M.

AU - Stitzer,Maxine

AU - Jones,Hendrée E.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objectives Reinforcement-based treatment (RBT) plus recovery housing (RBTRH) improves outcomes for individuals with opioid use disorders. No studies have examined the efficacy of RBT in the absence of abstinent-contingent housing. Methods We compared highly similar participants from a study of outpatient RBT (RBT, n = 55) and the RBTRH (n = 80) arm of a randomized trial wherein participants received abstinent-contingent payment for recovery housing sponsored by the research program. Abstinence and employment outcomes were assessed at one, three, and six months. Regression was used to identify predictors of abstinence. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of housing on outcomes. Results RBT and RBTRH participants had similar abstinence and employment outcomes. Predictors of abstinence in the sample included recovery housing residence and employment. However, a distinct RBT sub-group emerged, as 33% of the sample accessed self-pay RH (RBTSPRH). Sensitivity analyses compared the two RH groups (self-pay and program-supported) to RBT outpatient treatment (RBT). The RBTSPRH and RBTRH groups had similar abstinence outcomes, and both groups had superior abstinence outcomes compared to RBT. The RBTSPRH group had the most sustained effects relative to RBT, including higher abstinence rates, and more favorable employment outcomes at six months (ps < .05). The RBTSPRH group reported more days of employment compared to both the RBT and RBTRH groups at three months (ps < .05). Conclusions Findings highlight the importance of recovery housing for promoting improved outcomes among RBT participants. Research is needed to explore the aspects of recovery housing versus outpatient treatment that are associated with improved outcomes in the population.

AB - Objectives Reinforcement-based treatment (RBT) plus recovery housing (RBTRH) improves outcomes for individuals with opioid use disorders. No studies have examined the efficacy of RBT in the absence of abstinent-contingent housing. Methods We compared highly similar participants from a study of outpatient RBT (RBT, n = 55) and the RBTRH (n = 80) arm of a randomized trial wherein participants received abstinent-contingent payment for recovery housing sponsored by the research program. Abstinence and employment outcomes were assessed at one, three, and six months. Regression was used to identify predictors of abstinence. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of housing on outcomes. Results RBT and RBTRH participants had similar abstinence and employment outcomes. Predictors of abstinence in the sample included recovery housing residence and employment. However, a distinct RBT sub-group emerged, as 33% of the sample accessed self-pay RH (RBTSPRH). Sensitivity analyses compared the two RH groups (self-pay and program-supported) to RBT outpatient treatment (RBT). The RBTSPRH and RBTRH groups had similar abstinence outcomes, and both groups had superior abstinence outcomes compared to RBT. The RBTSPRH group had the most sustained effects relative to RBT, including higher abstinence rates, and more favorable employment outcomes at six months (ps < .05). The RBTSPRH group reported more days of employment compared to both the RBT and RBTRH groups at three months (ps < .05). Conclusions Findings highlight the importance of recovery housing for promoting improved outcomes among RBT participants. Research is needed to explore the aspects of recovery housing versus outpatient treatment that are associated with improved outcomes in the population.

KW - Cocaine use

KW - Opioid use

KW - Treatment outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002548183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002548183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.09.001

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 48

EP - 55

JO - Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

T2 - Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

JF - Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

SN - 0740-5472

ER -