A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the nationwide inpatient sample

Aslam Ejaz, Teviah Sachs, Jin He, Gaya Spolverato, Kenzo Hirose, Nita Ahuja, Christopher L. Wolfgang, Martin A. Makary, Matthew Weiss, Timothy M. Pawlik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques for pancreatic and liver operations remains ill defined. We sought to compare inpatient outcomes among patients undergoing open versus MIS pancreas and liver operations using a nationally representative cohort. Methods We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database for all major pancreatic and hepatic resections performed between 2000 and 2011. Appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) coding modifiers for laparoscopy and robotic assist were used to categorize procedures as MIS. Demographics, comorbidities, and inpatient outcomes were compared between the open and MIS groups. Results A total of 65,033 resections were identified (pancreas, n = 36,195 [55.7%]; liver, n = 28,035 [43.1%]; combined pancreas and liver, n = 803 [1.2%]). The overwhelming majority of operations were performed open (n = 62,192, 95.6%), whereas 4.4% (n = 2,841) were MIS. The overall use of MIS increased from 2.3% in 2000 to 7.5% in 2011. Compared with patients undergoing an open operation, MIS patients were older and had a greater incidence of multiple comorbid conditions. After operation, the incidence of complications for MIS (pancreas, 35.4%; liver, 29.5%) was lower than for open (pancreas, 41.6%; liver, 33%) procedures (all P <.05) resulting in a shorter median length of stay (8 vs 7 days; P =.001) as well as a lower in-hospital mortality (5.1% vs 2.8%; P =.001). Conclusion During the last decade, the number of MIS pancreatic and hepatic operations has increased, with nearly 1 in 13 HPB cases now being performed via an MIS approach. Despite MIS patients tending to have more preoperative medical comorbidities, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and duration of stay compared favorably with open surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)538-547
Number of pages10
JournalSurgery (United States)
Volume156
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the nationwide inpatient sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this