A comparison of ocular trauma scores in a pediatric population

Abdelhalim Awidi, Courtney Kraus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Pediatric ocular trauma represents a major concern for ophthalmologists. Delays in presentation, incomplete exams, inaccurate visual acuity (VA) results, and amblyopia can limit accurately predicting final visual outcomes in pediatric eye trauma. We performed a retrospective clinical study to describe the demographics and causes of eye trauma. We also compared 2 ocular trauma scoring systems, one specifically designed for pediatric trauma, to classify injuries and determine which better predicted VA outcomes. A retrospective chart review of 3 years of pediatric globe trauma was performed. Analysis was focused on mechanisms of injury and VA outcomes. Complex factors that may worsen outcomes were recorded. Ocular trauma score (OTS) and pediatric ocular trauma score (POTS) were used to assign Groups 1-5 to each case. Group 1 was poorest prognosis, Group 5 best. Association between Group and final VA was examined. Accuracy of the two systems was compared. Results: 23 children met eligibility criteria (13 male). Initial VA averaged 20/200 (range no light perception (NLP) - 20/20). Final VA was 20/150 (range no light perception (NLP) - 20/20). Objects of injury were sharp metallic household objects (7), miscellaneous (4), toys (3), BB pellets (2), stick/wood (2), pencil/pen (1).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number569
JournalBMC Research Notes
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 11 2019

Fingerprint

Pediatrics
Wounds and Injuries
Visual Acuity
Population
Wood
Needlestick Injuries
Light
Play and Playthings
Amblyopia
Retrospective Studies
Demography

Keywords

  • Eye injuries
  • Ocular trauma score
  • Pediatric eye trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

A comparison of ocular trauma scores in a pediatric population. / Awidi, Abdelhalim; Kraus, Courtney.

In: BMC Research Notes, Vol. 12, No. 1, 569, 11.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e05a82d150a841379c5532777edc2fd9,
title = "A comparison of ocular trauma scores in a pediatric population",
abstract = "Objective: Pediatric ocular trauma represents a major concern for ophthalmologists. Delays in presentation, incomplete exams, inaccurate visual acuity (VA) results, and amblyopia can limit accurately predicting final visual outcomes in pediatric eye trauma. We performed a retrospective clinical study to describe the demographics and causes of eye trauma. We also compared 2 ocular trauma scoring systems, one specifically designed for pediatric trauma, to classify injuries and determine which better predicted VA outcomes. A retrospective chart review of 3 years of pediatric globe trauma was performed. Analysis was focused on mechanisms of injury and VA outcomes. Complex factors that may worsen outcomes were recorded. Ocular trauma score (OTS) and pediatric ocular trauma score (POTS) were used to assign Groups 1-5 to each case. Group 1 was poorest prognosis, Group 5 best. Association between Group and final VA was examined. Accuracy of the two systems was compared. Results: 23 children met eligibility criteria (13 male). Initial VA averaged 20/200 (range no light perception (NLP) - 20/20). Final VA was 20/150 (range no light perception (NLP) - 20/20). Objects of injury were sharp metallic household objects (7), miscellaneous (4), toys (3), BB pellets (2), stick/wood (2), pencil/pen (1).",
keywords = "Eye injuries, Ocular trauma score, Pediatric eye trauma",
author = "Abdelhalim Awidi and Courtney Kraus",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1186/s13104-019-4602-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "BMC Research Notes",
issn = "1756-0500",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of ocular trauma scores in a pediatric population

AU - Awidi, Abdelhalim

AU - Kraus, Courtney

PY - 2019/9/11

Y1 - 2019/9/11

N2 - Objective: Pediatric ocular trauma represents a major concern for ophthalmologists. Delays in presentation, incomplete exams, inaccurate visual acuity (VA) results, and amblyopia can limit accurately predicting final visual outcomes in pediatric eye trauma. We performed a retrospective clinical study to describe the demographics and causes of eye trauma. We also compared 2 ocular trauma scoring systems, one specifically designed for pediatric trauma, to classify injuries and determine which better predicted VA outcomes. A retrospective chart review of 3 years of pediatric globe trauma was performed. Analysis was focused on mechanisms of injury and VA outcomes. Complex factors that may worsen outcomes were recorded. Ocular trauma score (OTS) and pediatric ocular trauma score (POTS) were used to assign Groups 1-5 to each case. Group 1 was poorest prognosis, Group 5 best. Association between Group and final VA was examined. Accuracy of the two systems was compared. Results: 23 children met eligibility criteria (13 male). Initial VA averaged 20/200 (range no light perception (NLP) - 20/20). Final VA was 20/150 (range no light perception (NLP) - 20/20). Objects of injury were sharp metallic household objects (7), miscellaneous (4), toys (3), BB pellets (2), stick/wood (2), pencil/pen (1).

AB - Objective: Pediatric ocular trauma represents a major concern for ophthalmologists. Delays in presentation, incomplete exams, inaccurate visual acuity (VA) results, and amblyopia can limit accurately predicting final visual outcomes in pediatric eye trauma. We performed a retrospective clinical study to describe the demographics and causes of eye trauma. We also compared 2 ocular trauma scoring systems, one specifically designed for pediatric trauma, to classify injuries and determine which better predicted VA outcomes. A retrospective chart review of 3 years of pediatric globe trauma was performed. Analysis was focused on mechanisms of injury and VA outcomes. Complex factors that may worsen outcomes were recorded. Ocular trauma score (OTS) and pediatric ocular trauma score (POTS) were used to assign Groups 1-5 to each case. Group 1 was poorest prognosis, Group 5 best. Association between Group and final VA was examined. Accuracy of the two systems was compared. Results: 23 children met eligibility criteria (13 male). Initial VA averaged 20/200 (range no light perception (NLP) - 20/20). Final VA was 20/150 (range no light perception (NLP) - 20/20). Objects of injury were sharp metallic household objects (7), miscellaneous (4), toys (3), BB pellets (2), stick/wood (2), pencil/pen (1).

KW - Eye injuries

KW - Ocular trauma score

KW - Pediatric eye trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072125179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072125179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13104-019-4602-8

DO - 10.1186/s13104-019-4602-8

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - BMC Research Notes

JF - BMC Research Notes

SN - 1756-0500

IS - 1

M1 - 569

ER -