A comparison of conventional and low-bleed implants in augmentation mammaplasty

Lawrence Chang, Elethea Caldwell, George Reading, R. Christie Wray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We conducted a double-blind, retrospective comparison between low-bleed and non-low-bleed (conventional) mammary implants because no controlled study has shown a difference in the degree of capsular contracture between the two types of implants. Twenty-five patients had conventional implants and form group A; twentyeight patients had low-bleed implants and form group B. All patients had submuscular augmentation. The mean Baker score was 1.51 for group A and 1.04 for group B for the entire patient population and 1.65 for group A and 1.07 for group B for patients with more than 1 year of follow-up. For the entire population, 34 percent of group A and 3.6 percent of group B had a Baker score of 2 or greater. For the population with more than 1 year of follow-up, 42 percent of group A and 7 percent of group B had a Baker score of 2 or greater. There was significantly (p 0.007) less contracture with the low-bleed implants for the entire population as well as for those patients with greater than 1 year of follow-up (p 0.015).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-82
Number of pages4
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume89
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mammaplasty
Contracture
Population
Breast Implants
Population Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Chang, L., Caldwell, E., Reading, G., & Wray, R. C. (1992). A comparison of conventional and low-bleed implants in augmentation mammaplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 89(1), 79-82.

A comparison of conventional and low-bleed implants in augmentation mammaplasty. / Chang, Lawrence; Caldwell, Elethea; Reading, George; Wray, R. Christie.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 89, No. 1, 1992, p. 79-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chang, L, Caldwell, E, Reading, G & Wray, RC 1992, 'A comparison of conventional and low-bleed implants in augmentation mammaplasty', Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 79-82.
Chang, Lawrence ; Caldwell, Elethea ; Reading, George ; Wray, R. Christie. / A comparison of conventional and low-bleed implants in augmentation mammaplasty. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1992 ; Vol. 89, No. 1. pp. 79-82.
@article{1090ea39057e464e97ecd64c7b308e18,
title = "A comparison of conventional and low-bleed implants in augmentation mammaplasty",
abstract = "We conducted a double-blind, retrospective comparison between low-bleed and non-low-bleed (conventional) mammary implants because no controlled study has shown a difference in the degree of capsular contracture between the two types of implants. Twenty-five patients had conventional implants and form group A; twentyeight patients had low-bleed implants and form group B. All patients had submuscular augmentation. The mean Baker score was 1.51 for group A and 1.04 for group B for the entire patient population and 1.65 for group A and 1.07 for group B for patients with more than 1 year of follow-up. For the entire population, 34 percent of group A and 3.6 percent of group B had a Baker score of 2 or greater. For the population with more than 1 year of follow-up, 42 percent of group A and 7 percent of group B had a Baker score of 2 or greater. There was significantly (p 0.007) less contracture with the low-bleed implants for the entire population as well as for those patients with greater than 1 year of follow-up (p 0.015).",
author = "Lawrence Chang and Elethea Caldwell and George Reading and Wray, {R. Christie}",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "79--82",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of conventional and low-bleed implants in augmentation mammaplasty

AU - Chang, Lawrence

AU - Caldwell, Elethea

AU - Reading, George

AU - Wray, R. Christie

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - We conducted a double-blind, retrospective comparison between low-bleed and non-low-bleed (conventional) mammary implants because no controlled study has shown a difference in the degree of capsular contracture between the two types of implants. Twenty-five patients had conventional implants and form group A; twentyeight patients had low-bleed implants and form group B. All patients had submuscular augmentation. The mean Baker score was 1.51 for group A and 1.04 for group B for the entire patient population and 1.65 for group A and 1.07 for group B for patients with more than 1 year of follow-up. For the entire population, 34 percent of group A and 3.6 percent of group B had a Baker score of 2 or greater. For the population with more than 1 year of follow-up, 42 percent of group A and 7 percent of group B had a Baker score of 2 or greater. There was significantly (p 0.007) less contracture with the low-bleed implants for the entire population as well as for those patients with greater than 1 year of follow-up (p 0.015).

AB - We conducted a double-blind, retrospective comparison between low-bleed and non-low-bleed (conventional) mammary implants because no controlled study has shown a difference in the degree of capsular contracture between the two types of implants. Twenty-five patients had conventional implants and form group A; twentyeight patients had low-bleed implants and form group B. All patients had submuscular augmentation. The mean Baker score was 1.51 for group A and 1.04 for group B for the entire patient population and 1.65 for group A and 1.07 for group B for patients with more than 1 year of follow-up. For the entire population, 34 percent of group A and 3.6 percent of group B had a Baker score of 2 or greater. For the population with more than 1 year of follow-up, 42 percent of group A and 7 percent of group B had a Baker score of 2 or greater. There was significantly (p 0.007) less contracture with the low-bleed implants for the entire population as well as for those patients with greater than 1 year of follow-up (p 0.015).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026594880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026594880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1727266

AN - SCOPUS:0026594880

VL - 89

SP - 79

EP - 82

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 1

ER -