A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis

Sally E Mitchell, R. A. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A comparison was made of sonography and computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Sonography correctly diagnosed nine of 49 patients with choledocholithiasis for a sensitivity rate of 18%. The accuracy rate for sonography was 19%; there were five false-positive examinations. CT correctly identified common duct stones in 26 of 30 patients for a sensitivity rate of 87%. The accuracy rate was 84%; there was one false positive. Sonography is limited in its ability to image calculi in the distal common bile duct. CT is effective for imaging common duct stones and is superior to sonography for diagnosing this cause of biliary obstruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)729-733
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume142
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Choledocholithiasis
Ultrasonography
Tomography
Calculi
Common Bile Duct

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis. / Mitchell, Sally E; Clark, R. A.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 142, No. 4, 1984, p. 729-733.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mitchell, Sally E ; Clark, R. A. / A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1984 ; Vol. 142, No. 4. pp. 729-733.
@article{fbfef55d9a9543ac86ca9a03e5febc1b,
title = "A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis",
abstract = "A comparison was made of sonography and computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Sonography correctly diagnosed nine of 49 patients with choledocholithiasis for a sensitivity rate of 18{\%}. The accuracy rate for sonography was 19{\%}; there were five false-positive examinations. CT correctly identified common duct stones in 26 of 30 patients for a sensitivity rate of 87{\%}. The accuracy rate was 84{\%}; there was one false positive. Sonography is limited in its ability to image calculi in the distal common bile duct. CT is effective for imaging common duct stones and is superior to sonography for diagnosing this cause of biliary obstruction.",
author = "Mitchell, {Sally E} and Clark, {R. A.}",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "729--733",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis

AU - Mitchell, Sally E

AU - Clark, R. A.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - A comparison was made of sonography and computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Sonography correctly diagnosed nine of 49 patients with choledocholithiasis for a sensitivity rate of 18%. The accuracy rate for sonography was 19%; there were five false-positive examinations. CT correctly identified common duct stones in 26 of 30 patients for a sensitivity rate of 87%. The accuracy rate was 84%; there was one false positive. Sonography is limited in its ability to image calculi in the distal common bile duct. CT is effective for imaging common duct stones and is superior to sonography for diagnosing this cause of biliary obstruction.

AB - A comparison was made of sonography and computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Sonography correctly diagnosed nine of 49 patients with choledocholithiasis for a sensitivity rate of 18%. The accuracy rate for sonography was 19%; there were five false-positive examinations. CT correctly identified common duct stones in 26 of 30 patients for a sensitivity rate of 87%. The accuracy rate was 84%; there was one false positive. Sonography is limited in its ability to image calculi in the distal common bile duct. CT is effective for imaging common duct stones and is superior to sonography for diagnosing this cause of biliary obstruction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021364645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021364645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 142

SP - 729

EP - 733

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 4

ER -