A comparison of cardiac output by thoracic impedance and direct fick in children with congenital heart disease undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization

Katherine Taylor, Gustavo La Rotta, Brian W. McCrindle, Cedric Manlhiot, Andrew Redington, Helen Holtby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective(s): To evaluate the measurement of cardiac output (CO) using continuous electrical bioimpedance cardiography (Physioflow; Neumedx, Philadelphia, PA) (CO PF) with a simultaneous direct Fick measurement (CO FICK) in children with congenital heart disease. Design: A prospective cohort study comparing 2 methods of measurement of CO. Setting: A quaternary university-affiliated pediatric hospital. Participants: Children undergoing cardiac catheterization for clinical care. Interventions: The Physioflow measured continuous real time CO in 15-second epochs and simultaneous measurement of cardiac output by direct Fick (with mass spectrometry to assess VO 2) were acquired. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty-five patients were recruited, and data from 56 (25 males) were adequate for analysis. The median age at study was 3.5 years (range, 0.4-16.6 years), and the median body surface area was 0.62 m 2 (range, 0.31-1.71). There were 25 of 56 (45%) with univentricular physiology. A total of 19,228 Physioflow data points were available for the analysis of which 14,569 (76%) were valid; 96% of the invalid measurements were identified as artifacts by the device. The average cardiac index of valid measurements was 3.09 ± 0.72 L/min/m 2. Compared with the Fick CO, the mean bias was -0.09 L/min, but the 95% limits of agreement were -3.20 to +3.01 L/min/m 2. Consequently, only 20 of 56 (36%) of measurements were within 20%, and 31 of 56 (55%) of measurements were within 30% of each other. Conclusions: Compared with measurements made by direct Fick, CO measured using the Physioflow device was unreliable in anesthetized children with congenital heart disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)776-779
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cardiac Catheterization
Electric Impedance
Cardiac Output
Heart Diseases
Thorax
Equipment and Supplies
Pediatric Hospitals
Body Surface Area
Artifacts
Mass Spectrometry
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • cardiac output
  • congenital heart disease
  • Fick technique
  • pediatrics
  • thoracic impedance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

A comparison of cardiac output by thoracic impedance and direct fick in children with congenital heart disease undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. / Taylor, Katherine; La Rotta, Gustavo; McCrindle, Brian W.; Manlhiot, Cedric; Redington, Andrew; Holtby, Helen.

In: Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol. 25, No. 5, 01.10.2011, p. 776-779.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9690fd49f29429ba209741a226304c5,
title = "A comparison of cardiac output by thoracic impedance and direct fick in children with congenital heart disease undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization",
abstract = "Objective(s): To evaluate the measurement of cardiac output (CO) using continuous electrical bioimpedance cardiography (Physioflow; Neumedx, Philadelphia, PA) (CO PF) with a simultaneous direct Fick measurement (CO FICK) in children with congenital heart disease. Design: A prospective cohort study comparing 2 methods of measurement of CO. Setting: A quaternary university-affiliated pediatric hospital. Participants: Children undergoing cardiac catheterization for clinical care. Interventions: The Physioflow measured continuous real time CO in 15-second epochs and simultaneous measurement of cardiac output by direct Fick (with mass spectrometry to assess VO 2) were acquired. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty-five patients were recruited, and data from 56 (25 males) were adequate for analysis. The median age at study was 3.5 years (range, 0.4-16.6 years), and the median body surface area was 0.62 m 2 (range, 0.31-1.71). There were 25 of 56 (45{\%}) with univentricular physiology. A total of 19,228 Physioflow data points were available for the analysis of which 14,569 (76{\%}) were valid; 96{\%} of the invalid measurements were identified as artifacts by the device. The average cardiac index of valid measurements was 3.09 ± 0.72 L/min/m 2. Compared with the Fick CO, the mean bias was -0.09 L/min, but the 95{\%} limits of agreement were -3.20 to +3.01 L/min/m 2. Consequently, only 20 of 56 (36{\%}) of measurements were within 20{\%}, and 31 of 56 (55{\%}) of measurements were within 30{\%} of each other. Conclusions: Compared with measurements made by direct Fick, CO measured using the Physioflow device was unreliable in anesthetized children with congenital heart disease.",
keywords = "cardiac output, congenital heart disease, Fick technique, pediatrics, thoracic impedance",
author = "Katherine Taylor and {La Rotta}, Gustavo and McCrindle, {Brian W.} and Cedric Manlhiot and Andrew Redington and Helen Holtby",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.jvca.2011.05.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "776--779",
journal = "Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia",
issn = "1053-0770",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of cardiac output by thoracic impedance and direct fick in children with congenital heart disease undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization

AU - Taylor, Katherine

AU - La Rotta, Gustavo

AU - McCrindle, Brian W.

AU - Manlhiot, Cedric

AU - Redington, Andrew

AU - Holtby, Helen

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Objective(s): To evaluate the measurement of cardiac output (CO) using continuous electrical bioimpedance cardiography (Physioflow; Neumedx, Philadelphia, PA) (CO PF) with a simultaneous direct Fick measurement (CO FICK) in children with congenital heart disease. Design: A prospective cohort study comparing 2 methods of measurement of CO. Setting: A quaternary university-affiliated pediatric hospital. Participants: Children undergoing cardiac catheterization for clinical care. Interventions: The Physioflow measured continuous real time CO in 15-second epochs and simultaneous measurement of cardiac output by direct Fick (with mass spectrometry to assess VO 2) were acquired. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty-five patients were recruited, and data from 56 (25 males) were adequate for analysis. The median age at study was 3.5 years (range, 0.4-16.6 years), and the median body surface area was 0.62 m 2 (range, 0.31-1.71). There were 25 of 56 (45%) with univentricular physiology. A total of 19,228 Physioflow data points were available for the analysis of which 14,569 (76%) were valid; 96% of the invalid measurements were identified as artifacts by the device. The average cardiac index of valid measurements was 3.09 ± 0.72 L/min/m 2. Compared with the Fick CO, the mean bias was -0.09 L/min, but the 95% limits of agreement were -3.20 to +3.01 L/min/m 2. Consequently, only 20 of 56 (36%) of measurements were within 20%, and 31 of 56 (55%) of measurements were within 30% of each other. Conclusions: Compared with measurements made by direct Fick, CO measured using the Physioflow device was unreliable in anesthetized children with congenital heart disease.

AB - Objective(s): To evaluate the measurement of cardiac output (CO) using continuous electrical bioimpedance cardiography (Physioflow; Neumedx, Philadelphia, PA) (CO PF) with a simultaneous direct Fick measurement (CO FICK) in children with congenital heart disease. Design: A prospective cohort study comparing 2 methods of measurement of CO. Setting: A quaternary university-affiliated pediatric hospital. Participants: Children undergoing cardiac catheterization for clinical care. Interventions: The Physioflow measured continuous real time CO in 15-second epochs and simultaneous measurement of cardiac output by direct Fick (with mass spectrometry to assess VO 2) were acquired. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty-five patients were recruited, and data from 56 (25 males) were adequate for analysis. The median age at study was 3.5 years (range, 0.4-16.6 years), and the median body surface area was 0.62 m 2 (range, 0.31-1.71). There were 25 of 56 (45%) with univentricular physiology. A total of 19,228 Physioflow data points were available for the analysis of which 14,569 (76%) were valid; 96% of the invalid measurements were identified as artifacts by the device. The average cardiac index of valid measurements was 3.09 ± 0.72 L/min/m 2. Compared with the Fick CO, the mean bias was -0.09 L/min, but the 95% limits of agreement were -3.20 to +3.01 L/min/m 2. Consequently, only 20 of 56 (36%) of measurements were within 20%, and 31 of 56 (55%) of measurements were within 30% of each other. Conclusions: Compared with measurements made by direct Fick, CO measured using the Physioflow device was unreliable in anesthetized children with congenital heart disease.

KW - cardiac output

KW - congenital heart disease

KW - Fick technique

KW - pediatrics

KW - thoracic impedance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053570433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053570433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.05.002

DO - 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.05.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 21684761

AN - SCOPUS:80053570433

VL - 25

SP - 776

EP - 779

JO - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

SN - 1053-0770

IS - 5

ER -