A comparison of assistive technology and personal care in alleviating disability and unmet need

Emily Agree, Vicki A. Freedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The authors examine differences in reports of residual disability and unmet need by type of long-term care arrangement (assistive technology or personal care). Design and Methods: This study compares three specific dimensions of residual difficulty (pain, fatigue, and time intensity) and reports of unmet need across care arrangements. Samples from the U. S. 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey Phase 2 Disability Supplements include adults with limitations in bathing, transferring, walking, and getting outside. Results: Even when differences in underlying disability are accounted for, assistive technology (AT) confers no additional benefit in the three dimensions of residual difficulty analyzed here. AT users equally or more often report that tasks are tiring, time consuming, or painful, even when they use assistance. Though this would appear to indicate unmet needs for care, fewer AT users report a desire for hands-on personal care. Implications: Though disability alleviation by technology is no better on specific dimensions of difficulty, technology users report less unmet need for personal care. Designing appropriate and cost-effective home care for adults with disabilities requires a better understanding of the ways in which technology users may differ from others and the circumstances under which technology can be most effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-344
Number of pages10
JournalGerontologist
Volume43
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2003

Fingerprint

Self-Help Devices
Technology
Long-Term Care
Home Care Services
Health Surveys
Walking
Fatigue
Interviews
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pain

Keywords

  • Activities of daily living
  • Effectiveness
  • Long-term care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging

Cite this

A comparison of assistive technology and personal care in alleviating disability and unmet need. / Agree, Emily; Freedman, Vicki A.

In: Gerontologist, Vol. 43, No. 3, 06.2003, p. 335-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{615d4294c7664349bbff57ec86edbe8e,
title = "A comparison of assistive technology and personal care in alleviating disability and unmet need",
abstract = "Purpose: The authors examine differences in reports of residual disability and unmet need by type of long-term care arrangement (assistive technology or personal care). Design and Methods: This study compares three specific dimensions of residual difficulty (pain, fatigue, and time intensity) and reports of unmet need across care arrangements. Samples from the U. S. 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey Phase 2 Disability Supplements include adults with limitations in bathing, transferring, walking, and getting outside. Results: Even when differences in underlying disability are accounted for, assistive technology (AT) confers no additional benefit in the three dimensions of residual difficulty analyzed here. AT users equally or more often report that tasks are tiring, time consuming, or painful, even when they use assistance. Though this would appear to indicate unmet needs for care, fewer AT users report a desire for hands-on personal care. Implications: Though disability alleviation by technology is no better on specific dimensions of difficulty, technology users report less unmet need for personal care. Designing appropriate and cost-effective home care for adults with disabilities requires a better understanding of the ways in which technology users may differ from others and the circumstances under which technology can be most effective.",
keywords = "Activities of daily living, Effectiveness, Long-term care",
author = "Emily Agree and Freedman, {Vicki A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "335--344",
journal = "The Gerontologist",
issn = "0016-9013",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of assistive technology and personal care in alleviating disability and unmet need

AU - Agree, Emily

AU - Freedman, Vicki A.

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

N2 - Purpose: The authors examine differences in reports of residual disability and unmet need by type of long-term care arrangement (assistive technology or personal care). Design and Methods: This study compares three specific dimensions of residual difficulty (pain, fatigue, and time intensity) and reports of unmet need across care arrangements. Samples from the U. S. 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey Phase 2 Disability Supplements include adults with limitations in bathing, transferring, walking, and getting outside. Results: Even when differences in underlying disability are accounted for, assistive technology (AT) confers no additional benefit in the three dimensions of residual difficulty analyzed here. AT users equally or more often report that tasks are tiring, time consuming, or painful, even when they use assistance. Though this would appear to indicate unmet needs for care, fewer AT users report a desire for hands-on personal care. Implications: Though disability alleviation by technology is no better on specific dimensions of difficulty, technology users report less unmet need for personal care. Designing appropriate and cost-effective home care for adults with disabilities requires a better understanding of the ways in which technology users may differ from others and the circumstances under which technology can be most effective.

AB - Purpose: The authors examine differences in reports of residual disability and unmet need by type of long-term care arrangement (assistive technology or personal care). Design and Methods: This study compares three specific dimensions of residual difficulty (pain, fatigue, and time intensity) and reports of unmet need across care arrangements. Samples from the U. S. 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey Phase 2 Disability Supplements include adults with limitations in bathing, transferring, walking, and getting outside. Results: Even when differences in underlying disability are accounted for, assistive technology (AT) confers no additional benefit in the three dimensions of residual difficulty analyzed here. AT users equally or more often report that tasks are tiring, time consuming, or painful, even when they use assistance. Though this would appear to indicate unmet needs for care, fewer AT users report a desire for hands-on personal care. Implications: Though disability alleviation by technology is no better on specific dimensions of difficulty, technology users report less unmet need for personal care. Designing appropriate and cost-effective home care for adults with disabilities requires a better understanding of the ways in which technology users may differ from others and the circumstances under which technology can be most effective.

KW - Activities of daily living

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Long-term care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038795581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038795581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12810897

AN - SCOPUS:0038795581

VL - 43

SP - 335

EP - 344

JO - The Gerontologist

JF - The Gerontologist

SN - 0016-9013

IS - 3

ER -