A common evaluation framework for the African Health Initiative

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The African Health Initiative includes highly diverse partnerships in five countries (Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia), each of which is working to improve population health by strengthening health systems and to evaluate the results. One aim of the Initiative is to generate cross-site learning that can inform implementation in the five partnerships during the project period and identify lessons that may be generalizable to other countries in the region. Collaborators in the Initiative developed a common evaluation framework as a basis for this cross-site learning. Methods. This paper describes the components of the framework; this includes the conceptual model, core metrics to be measured in all sites, and standard guidelines for reporting on the implementation of partnership activities and contextual factors that may affect implementation, or the results it produces. We also describe the systems that have been put in place for data management, data quality assessments, and cross-site analysis of results. Results and conclusions. The conceptual model for the Initiative highlights points in the causal chain between health system strengthening activities and health impact where evidence produced by the partnerships can contribute to learning. This model represents an important advance over its predecessors by including contextual factors and implementation strength as potential determinants, and explicitly including equity as a component of both outcomes and impact. Specific measurement challenges include the prospective documentation of program implementation and contextual factors. Methodological issues addressed in the development of the framework include the aggregation of data collected using different methods and the challenge of evaluating a complex set of interventions being improved over time based on continuous monitoring and intermediate results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberS10
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume13
Issue numberSUPPL.2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Health
Learning
Rwanda
Mozambique
Zambia
Ghana
Tanzania
Documentation
Guidelines
Population
Data Accuracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

A common evaluation framework for the African Health Initiative. / Bryce, Jennifer; Requejo, Jennifer Harris; Moulton, Lawrence Hale; Ram, Malathi; Black, Robert E.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 13, No. SUPPL.2, S10, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8d1d67629d0343c09dd0d42f9369172e,
title = "A common evaluation framework for the African Health Initiative",
abstract = "Background: The African Health Initiative includes highly diverse partnerships in five countries (Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia), each of which is working to improve population health by strengthening health systems and to evaluate the results. One aim of the Initiative is to generate cross-site learning that can inform implementation in the five partnerships during the project period and identify lessons that may be generalizable to other countries in the region. Collaborators in the Initiative developed a common evaluation framework as a basis for this cross-site learning. Methods. This paper describes the components of the framework; this includes the conceptual model, core metrics to be measured in all sites, and standard guidelines for reporting on the implementation of partnership activities and contextual factors that may affect implementation, or the results it produces. We also describe the systems that have been put in place for data management, data quality assessments, and cross-site analysis of results. Results and conclusions. The conceptual model for the Initiative highlights points in the causal chain between health system strengthening activities and health impact where evidence produced by the partnerships can contribute to learning. This model represents an important advance over its predecessors by including contextual factors and implementation strength as potential determinants, and explicitly including equity as a component of both outcomes and impact. Specific measurement challenges include the prospective documentation of program implementation and contextual factors. Methodological issues addressed in the development of the framework include the aggregation of data collected using different methods and the challenge of evaluating a complex set of interventions being improved over time based on continuous monitoring and intermediate results.",
author = "Jennifer Bryce and Requejo, {Jennifer Harris} and Moulton, {Lawrence Hale} and Malathi Ram and Black, {Robert E}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-13-S2-S10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "SUPPL.2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A common evaluation framework for the African Health Initiative

AU - Bryce, Jennifer

AU - Requejo, Jennifer Harris

AU - Moulton, Lawrence Hale

AU - Ram, Malathi

AU - Black, Robert E

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: The African Health Initiative includes highly diverse partnerships in five countries (Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia), each of which is working to improve population health by strengthening health systems and to evaluate the results. One aim of the Initiative is to generate cross-site learning that can inform implementation in the five partnerships during the project period and identify lessons that may be generalizable to other countries in the region. Collaborators in the Initiative developed a common evaluation framework as a basis for this cross-site learning. Methods. This paper describes the components of the framework; this includes the conceptual model, core metrics to be measured in all sites, and standard guidelines for reporting on the implementation of partnership activities and contextual factors that may affect implementation, or the results it produces. We also describe the systems that have been put in place for data management, data quality assessments, and cross-site analysis of results. Results and conclusions. The conceptual model for the Initiative highlights points in the causal chain between health system strengthening activities and health impact where evidence produced by the partnerships can contribute to learning. This model represents an important advance over its predecessors by including contextual factors and implementation strength as potential determinants, and explicitly including equity as a component of both outcomes and impact. Specific measurement challenges include the prospective documentation of program implementation and contextual factors. Methodological issues addressed in the development of the framework include the aggregation of data collected using different methods and the challenge of evaluating a complex set of interventions being improved over time based on continuous monitoring and intermediate results.

AB - Background: The African Health Initiative includes highly diverse partnerships in five countries (Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia), each of which is working to improve population health by strengthening health systems and to evaluate the results. One aim of the Initiative is to generate cross-site learning that can inform implementation in the five partnerships during the project period and identify lessons that may be generalizable to other countries in the region. Collaborators in the Initiative developed a common evaluation framework as a basis for this cross-site learning. Methods. This paper describes the components of the framework; this includes the conceptual model, core metrics to be measured in all sites, and standard guidelines for reporting on the implementation of partnership activities and contextual factors that may affect implementation, or the results it produces. We also describe the systems that have been put in place for data management, data quality assessments, and cross-site analysis of results. Results and conclusions. The conceptual model for the Initiative highlights points in the causal chain between health system strengthening activities and health impact where evidence produced by the partnerships can contribute to learning. This model represents an important advance over its predecessors by including contextual factors and implementation strength as potential determinants, and explicitly including equity as a component of both outcomes and impact. Specific measurement challenges include the prospective documentation of program implementation and contextual factors. Methodological issues addressed in the development of the framework include the aggregation of data collected using different methods and the challenge of evaluating a complex set of interventions being improved over time based on continuous monitoring and intermediate results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878525583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878525583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-13-S2-S10

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-13-S2-S10

M3 - Article

C2 - 23819778

AN - SCOPUS:84878525583

VL - 13

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - SUPPL.2

M1 - S10

ER -