A cluster randomized trial of community mobilization to reduce methamphetamine use and HIV risk among youth in Thailand

Design, implementation and results

Noya Galai, Bangorn Sirirojn, Apinun Aramrattana, Kamolrawee Srichan, Nicholas Thomson, Asieh Golozar, Jose M. Flores, Nancy Willard, Jonathan Ellen, Susan Sherman, David D Celentano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Use of methamphetamines (MA) and other stimulants have consistently been associated with HIV/STI risk globally. We evaluated a community mobilization intervention (Connect to Protect, C2P®) to prevent MA use among youth and reduce HIV risk behaviors through community structural changes. Design: A community-randomized trial in northern Thailand with matched districts randomized to C2P intervention or a standard voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) control. Intervention districts formed stakeholders' coalitions to plan tailored local prevention programs. Two independent random household samples of youth aged 14–24 were surveyed in 2009 and 2012. Lifetime and recent MA use was modeled with multilevel logistic regression. Results: Intervention initiatives included family-strengthening programs, school-based programs and opening a community drug treatment center. Control communities applied the government-led “war on drugs” approach in addition to youth and family programs. Baseline (N = 1077) and follow-up (N = 1225) samples included 47.5% females and 21.7% aged ≤16. Lifetime MA use in intervention districts reduced from 13.4% to 11.7% compared to reduction from 16.2% to 10.4% in the control districts (non-significant). In models, lifetime MA use was associated with: time (aOR = 0.6, 95%CI: 0.38–0.83), females (aOR = 0.2, 95%CI: 0.15–0.29), increasing age (aOR = 2.4, 95%CI: 1.40–4.20, ages 16–19; aOR = 3.5, 95%CI: 2.00–6.12, ages ≥20), and not being full-time students (aOR = 5.3, 95%CI: 3.77–7.37). Recent MA use showed similar results. Additionally, lifetime MA use was significantly associated with alcohol use, risky sexual behaviors and elevated depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Delay in developing and implementing specific prevention programs in the intervention districts slowed diffusion of the effect into the communities. Secular trends with contentious civil unrest and active drug-enforcement efforts in the control communities also contributed to the null intervention effect. Longer time and intensified efforts stressing a public health approach are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of community mobilization in reducing substance use and HIV risk in this rural Thai community.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)216-223
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume211
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Methamphetamine
Thailand
mobilization
HIV
community
district
family program
drug
Substance Abuse Treatment Centers
youth program
Mobilization
AIDS/HIV
Rural Population
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Risk-Taking
risk behavior
structural change
Sexual Behavior
Pharmaceutical Preparations
rural community

Keywords

  • Adolescents and young adults
  • Cluster randomized trial
  • Community mobilization
  • Connect to Protect
  • HIV prevention
  • Methamphetamine use
  • Thailand

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

A cluster randomized trial of community mobilization to reduce methamphetamine use and HIV risk among youth in Thailand : Design, implementation and results. / Galai, Noya; Sirirojn, Bangorn; Aramrattana, Apinun; Srichan, Kamolrawee; Thomson, Nicholas; Golozar, Asieh; Flores, Jose M.; Willard, Nancy; Ellen, Jonathan; Sherman, Susan; Celentano, David D.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 211, 01.08.2018, p. 216-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Galai, Noya ; Sirirojn, Bangorn ; Aramrattana, Apinun ; Srichan, Kamolrawee ; Thomson, Nicholas ; Golozar, Asieh ; Flores, Jose M. ; Willard, Nancy ; Ellen, Jonathan ; Sherman, Susan ; Celentano, David D. / A cluster randomized trial of community mobilization to reduce methamphetamine use and HIV risk among youth in Thailand : Design, implementation and results. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 211. pp. 216-223.
@article{97146c1cd96948a3b070e2b0c5eb6b0c,
title = "A cluster randomized trial of community mobilization to reduce methamphetamine use and HIV risk among youth in Thailand: Design, implementation and results",
abstract = "Background: Use of methamphetamines (MA) and other stimulants have consistently been associated with HIV/STI risk globally. We evaluated a community mobilization intervention (Connect to Protect, C2P{\circledR}) to prevent MA use among youth and reduce HIV risk behaviors through community structural changes. Design: A community-randomized trial in northern Thailand with matched districts randomized to C2P intervention or a standard voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) control. Intervention districts formed stakeholders' coalitions to plan tailored local prevention programs. Two independent random household samples of youth aged 14–24 were surveyed in 2009 and 2012. Lifetime and recent MA use was modeled with multilevel logistic regression. Results: Intervention initiatives included family-strengthening programs, school-based programs and opening a community drug treatment center. Control communities applied the government-led “war on drugs” approach in addition to youth and family programs. Baseline (N = 1077) and follow-up (N = 1225) samples included 47.5{\%} females and 21.7{\%} aged ≤16. Lifetime MA use in intervention districts reduced from 13.4{\%} to 11.7{\%} compared to reduction from 16.2{\%} to 10.4{\%} in the control districts (non-significant). In models, lifetime MA use was associated with: time (aOR = 0.6, 95{\%}CI: 0.38–0.83), females (aOR = 0.2, 95{\%}CI: 0.15–0.29), increasing age (aOR = 2.4, 95{\%}CI: 1.40–4.20, ages 16–19; aOR = 3.5, 95{\%}CI: 2.00–6.12, ages ≥20), and not being full-time students (aOR = 5.3, 95{\%}CI: 3.77–7.37). Recent MA use showed similar results. Additionally, lifetime MA use was significantly associated with alcohol use, risky sexual behaviors and elevated depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Delay in developing and implementing specific prevention programs in the intervention districts slowed diffusion of the effect into the communities. Secular trends with contentious civil unrest and active drug-enforcement efforts in the control communities also contributed to the null intervention effect. Longer time and intensified efforts stressing a public health approach are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of community mobilization in reducing substance use and HIV risk in this rural Thai community.",
keywords = "Adolescents and young adults, Cluster randomized trial, Community mobilization, Connect to Protect, HIV prevention, Methamphetamine use, Thailand",
author = "Noya Galai and Bangorn Sirirojn and Apinun Aramrattana and Kamolrawee Srichan and Nicholas Thomson and Asieh Golozar and Flores, {Jose M.} and Nancy Willard and Jonathan Ellen and Susan Sherman and Celentano, {David D}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "211",
pages = "216--223",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cluster randomized trial of community mobilization to reduce methamphetamine use and HIV risk among youth in Thailand

T2 - Design, implementation and results

AU - Galai, Noya

AU - Sirirojn, Bangorn

AU - Aramrattana, Apinun

AU - Srichan, Kamolrawee

AU - Thomson, Nicholas

AU - Golozar, Asieh

AU - Flores, Jose M.

AU - Willard, Nancy

AU - Ellen, Jonathan

AU - Sherman, Susan

AU - Celentano, David D

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Background: Use of methamphetamines (MA) and other stimulants have consistently been associated with HIV/STI risk globally. We evaluated a community mobilization intervention (Connect to Protect, C2P®) to prevent MA use among youth and reduce HIV risk behaviors through community structural changes. Design: A community-randomized trial in northern Thailand with matched districts randomized to C2P intervention or a standard voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) control. Intervention districts formed stakeholders' coalitions to plan tailored local prevention programs. Two independent random household samples of youth aged 14–24 were surveyed in 2009 and 2012. Lifetime and recent MA use was modeled with multilevel logistic regression. Results: Intervention initiatives included family-strengthening programs, school-based programs and opening a community drug treatment center. Control communities applied the government-led “war on drugs” approach in addition to youth and family programs. Baseline (N = 1077) and follow-up (N = 1225) samples included 47.5% females and 21.7% aged ≤16. Lifetime MA use in intervention districts reduced from 13.4% to 11.7% compared to reduction from 16.2% to 10.4% in the control districts (non-significant). In models, lifetime MA use was associated with: time (aOR = 0.6, 95%CI: 0.38–0.83), females (aOR = 0.2, 95%CI: 0.15–0.29), increasing age (aOR = 2.4, 95%CI: 1.40–4.20, ages 16–19; aOR = 3.5, 95%CI: 2.00–6.12, ages ≥20), and not being full-time students (aOR = 5.3, 95%CI: 3.77–7.37). Recent MA use showed similar results. Additionally, lifetime MA use was significantly associated with alcohol use, risky sexual behaviors and elevated depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Delay in developing and implementing specific prevention programs in the intervention districts slowed diffusion of the effect into the communities. Secular trends with contentious civil unrest and active drug-enforcement efforts in the control communities also contributed to the null intervention effect. Longer time and intensified efforts stressing a public health approach are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of community mobilization in reducing substance use and HIV risk in this rural Thai community.

AB - Background: Use of methamphetamines (MA) and other stimulants have consistently been associated with HIV/STI risk globally. We evaluated a community mobilization intervention (Connect to Protect, C2P®) to prevent MA use among youth and reduce HIV risk behaviors through community structural changes. Design: A community-randomized trial in northern Thailand with matched districts randomized to C2P intervention or a standard voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) control. Intervention districts formed stakeholders' coalitions to plan tailored local prevention programs. Two independent random household samples of youth aged 14–24 were surveyed in 2009 and 2012. Lifetime and recent MA use was modeled with multilevel logistic regression. Results: Intervention initiatives included family-strengthening programs, school-based programs and opening a community drug treatment center. Control communities applied the government-led “war on drugs” approach in addition to youth and family programs. Baseline (N = 1077) and follow-up (N = 1225) samples included 47.5% females and 21.7% aged ≤16. Lifetime MA use in intervention districts reduced from 13.4% to 11.7% compared to reduction from 16.2% to 10.4% in the control districts (non-significant). In models, lifetime MA use was associated with: time (aOR = 0.6, 95%CI: 0.38–0.83), females (aOR = 0.2, 95%CI: 0.15–0.29), increasing age (aOR = 2.4, 95%CI: 1.40–4.20, ages 16–19; aOR = 3.5, 95%CI: 2.00–6.12, ages ≥20), and not being full-time students (aOR = 5.3, 95%CI: 3.77–7.37). Recent MA use showed similar results. Additionally, lifetime MA use was significantly associated with alcohol use, risky sexual behaviors and elevated depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Delay in developing and implementing specific prevention programs in the intervention districts slowed diffusion of the effect into the communities. Secular trends with contentious civil unrest and active drug-enforcement efforts in the control communities also contributed to the null intervention effect. Longer time and intensified efforts stressing a public health approach are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of community mobilization in reducing substance use and HIV risk in this rural Thai community.

KW - Adolescents and young adults

KW - Cluster randomized trial

KW - Community mobilization

KW - Connect to Protect

KW - HIV prevention

KW - Methamphetamine use

KW - Thailand

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049066761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049066761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.013

M3 - Article

VL - 211

SP - 216

EP - 223

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -