A call for more science in forensic science

Suzanne Bell, Sunita Sah, Thomas D. Albright, S. James Gates, M. Bonner Denton, Arturo Casadevall

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Forensic science is critical to the administration of justice. The discipline of forensic science is remarkably complex and includes methodologies ranging from DNA analysis to chemical composition to pattern recognition. Many forensic practices developed under the auspices of law enforcement and were vetted primarily by the legal system rather than being subjected to scientific scrutiny and empirical testing. Beginning in the 1990s, exonerations based on DNA-related methods revealed problems with some forensic disciplines, leading to calls for major reforms. This process generated a National Academy of Science report in 2009 that was highly critical of many forensic practices and eventually led to the establishment of the National Commission for Forensic Science (NCFS) in 2013. The NCFS was a deliberative body that catalyzed communication between nonforensic scientists, forensic scientists, and other stakeholders in the legal community. In 2017, despite continuing problems with forensic science, the Department of Justice terminated the NCFS. Just when forensic science needs the most support, it is getting the least. We urge the larger scientific community to come to the aid of our forensic colleagues by advocating for urgently needed research, testing, and financial support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4541-4544
Number of pages4
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume115
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Forensic Sciences
Social Justice
Financial Support
Law Enforcement
DNA
Research

Keywords

  • crime
  • DNA
  • Forensic science
  • investigation
  • justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

A call for more science in forensic science. / Bell, Suzanne; Sah, Sunita; Albright, Thomas D.; James Gates, S.; Bonner Denton, M.; Casadevall, Arturo.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 115, No. 18, 01.05.2018, p. 4541-4544.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Bell, Suzanne ; Sah, Sunita ; Albright, Thomas D. ; James Gates, S. ; Bonner Denton, M. ; Casadevall, Arturo. / A call for more science in forensic science. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018 ; Vol. 115, No. 18. pp. 4541-4544.
@article{f4e7cf87bdc0448f978f8ef7dae4460f,
title = "A call for more science in forensic science",
abstract = "Forensic science is critical to the administration of justice. The discipline of forensic science is remarkably complex and includes methodologies ranging from DNA analysis to chemical composition to pattern recognition. Many forensic practices developed under the auspices of law enforcement and were vetted primarily by the legal system rather than being subjected to scientific scrutiny and empirical testing. Beginning in the 1990s, exonerations based on DNA-related methods revealed problems with some forensic disciplines, leading to calls for major reforms. This process generated a National Academy of Science report in 2009 that was highly critical of many forensic practices and eventually led to the establishment of the National Commission for Forensic Science (NCFS) in 2013. The NCFS was a deliberative body that catalyzed communication between nonforensic scientists, forensic scientists, and other stakeholders in the legal community. In 2017, despite continuing problems with forensic science, the Department of Justice terminated the NCFS. Just when forensic science needs the most support, it is getting the least. We urge the larger scientific community to come to the aid of our forensic colleagues by advocating for urgently needed research, testing, and financial support.",
keywords = "crime, DNA, Forensic science, investigation, justice",
author = "Suzanne Bell and Sunita Sah and Albright, {Thomas D.} and {James Gates}, S. and {Bonner Denton}, M. and Arturo Casadevall",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1712161115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "4541--4544",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A call for more science in forensic science

AU - Bell, Suzanne

AU - Sah, Sunita

AU - Albright, Thomas D.

AU - James Gates, S.

AU - Bonner Denton, M.

AU - Casadevall, Arturo

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Forensic science is critical to the administration of justice. The discipline of forensic science is remarkably complex and includes methodologies ranging from DNA analysis to chemical composition to pattern recognition. Many forensic practices developed under the auspices of law enforcement and were vetted primarily by the legal system rather than being subjected to scientific scrutiny and empirical testing. Beginning in the 1990s, exonerations based on DNA-related methods revealed problems with some forensic disciplines, leading to calls for major reforms. This process generated a National Academy of Science report in 2009 that was highly critical of many forensic practices and eventually led to the establishment of the National Commission for Forensic Science (NCFS) in 2013. The NCFS was a deliberative body that catalyzed communication between nonforensic scientists, forensic scientists, and other stakeholders in the legal community. In 2017, despite continuing problems with forensic science, the Department of Justice terminated the NCFS. Just when forensic science needs the most support, it is getting the least. We urge the larger scientific community to come to the aid of our forensic colleagues by advocating for urgently needed research, testing, and financial support.

AB - Forensic science is critical to the administration of justice. The discipline of forensic science is remarkably complex and includes methodologies ranging from DNA analysis to chemical composition to pattern recognition. Many forensic practices developed under the auspices of law enforcement and were vetted primarily by the legal system rather than being subjected to scientific scrutiny and empirical testing. Beginning in the 1990s, exonerations based on DNA-related methods revealed problems with some forensic disciplines, leading to calls for major reforms. This process generated a National Academy of Science report in 2009 that was highly critical of many forensic practices and eventually led to the establishment of the National Commission for Forensic Science (NCFS) in 2013. The NCFS was a deliberative body that catalyzed communication between nonforensic scientists, forensic scientists, and other stakeholders in the legal community. In 2017, despite continuing problems with forensic science, the Department of Justice terminated the NCFS. Just when forensic science needs the most support, it is getting the least. We urge the larger scientific community to come to the aid of our forensic colleagues by advocating for urgently needed research, testing, and financial support.

KW - crime

KW - DNA

KW - Forensic science

KW - investigation

KW - justice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046293577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046293577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1712161115

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1712161115

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29650539

AN - SCOPUS:85046293577

VL - 115

SP - 4541

EP - 4544

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 18

ER -