A bundled quality improvement program to standardize clinical blood pressure measurement in primary care

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We evaluated use of a program to improve blood pressure measurement at 6 primary care clinics over a 6-month period. The program consisted of automated devices, clinical training, and support for systems change. Unannounced audits and electronic medical records provided evaluation data. Clinics used devices in 81.0% of encounters and used them as intended in 71.6% of encounters, but implementation fidelity varied. Intervention site systolic and diastolic blood pressure with terminal digit “0” decreased from 32.1% and 33.7% to 11.1% and 11.3%, respectively. Improvement occurred uniformly, regardless of sites’ adherence to the measurement protocol. Providers rechecked blood pressure measurements less often post-intervention (from 23.5% to 8.1% of visits overall). Providers at sites with high protocol adherence were less likely to recheck measurements than those at low adherence sites. Comparison sites exhibited no change in terminal digit preference or repeat measurements. This study demonstrates that clinics can apply a pragmatic intervention to improve blood pressure measurement. Additional refinement may improve implementation fidelity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)324-333
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Hypertension
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Keywords

  • blood pressure measurement
  • chronic disease
  • hypertension
  • implementation science
  • primary care
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A bundled quality improvement program to standardize clinical blood pressure measurement in primary care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this