[25] Identification and ligand-induced modification of the cAMP receptor in Dictyostelium

Peter Klein, Anne Theibert, Peter N Devreotes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Photoaffinity labeling with 8-N3[32P]cAMP and in vivo phosphorylation with 32PO4 provide sensitive methods for the identification of the surface cAMP receptor. Photoaffinity labeling achieves high specificity while in practice, the in vivo 32P labeling affords considerably higher sensitivity. Both methods allow fairly direct assays of cellular responses to an extracellular cAMP stimulus at the level of the receptor-a shift in electrophoretic mobility and a rise in phosphorylation. Quantification of the shift in mobility, assayed by photolabeling, has shown a strong correlation between modification of the receptor and adaptation. These labelling techniques will also help to elucidate the role of the concomidant changes in receptor phosphorylation, which may cause the change in electrophoretic mobility. Furthermore, photolabeling and 32P labeling will allow study of the possible multiple affinity classes of the cAMP receptor and of the possible expression of cAMP receptors in later stages of development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-278
Number of pages12
JournalMethods in Enzymology
Volume159
Issue numberC
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cyclic AMP Receptors
Dictyostelium
Labeling
Phosphorylation
Ligands
Electrophoretic mobility
Assays

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

[25] Identification and ligand-induced modification of the cAMP receptor in Dictyostelium. / Klein, Peter; Theibert, Anne; Devreotes, Peter N.

In: Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 159, No. C, 1988, p. 267-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fa3384afa6f343318fa3bdef6a1e492c,
title = "[25] Identification and ligand-induced modification of the cAMP receptor in Dictyostelium",
abstract = "Photoaffinity labeling with 8-N3[32P]cAMP and in vivo phosphorylation with 32PO4 provide sensitive methods for the identification of the surface cAMP receptor. Photoaffinity labeling achieves high specificity while in practice, the in vivo 32P labeling affords considerably higher sensitivity. Both methods allow fairly direct assays of cellular responses to an extracellular cAMP stimulus at the level of the receptor-a shift in electrophoretic mobility and a rise in phosphorylation. Quantification of the shift in mobility, assayed by photolabeling, has shown a strong correlation between modification of the receptor and adaptation. These labelling techniques will also help to elucidate the role of the concomidant changes in receptor phosphorylation, which may cause the change in electrophoretic mobility. Furthermore, photolabeling and 32P labeling will allow study of the possible multiple affinity classes of the cAMP receptor and of the possible expression of cAMP receptors in later stages of development.",
author = "Peter Klein and Anne Theibert and Devreotes, {Peter N}",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1016/0076-6879(88)59027-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "159",
pages = "267--278",
journal = "ImmunoMethods",
issn = "1046-2023",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "C",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - [25] Identification and ligand-induced modification of the cAMP receptor in Dictyostelium

AU - Klein, Peter

AU - Theibert, Anne

AU - Devreotes, Peter N

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - Photoaffinity labeling with 8-N3[32P]cAMP and in vivo phosphorylation with 32PO4 provide sensitive methods for the identification of the surface cAMP receptor. Photoaffinity labeling achieves high specificity while in practice, the in vivo 32P labeling affords considerably higher sensitivity. Both methods allow fairly direct assays of cellular responses to an extracellular cAMP stimulus at the level of the receptor-a shift in electrophoretic mobility and a rise in phosphorylation. Quantification of the shift in mobility, assayed by photolabeling, has shown a strong correlation between modification of the receptor and adaptation. These labelling techniques will also help to elucidate the role of the concomidant changes in receptor phosphorylation, which may cause the change in electrophoretic mobility. Furthermore, photolabeling and 32P labeling will allow study of the possible multiple affinity classes of the cAMP receptor and of the possible expression of cAMP receptors in later stages of development.

AB - Photoaffinity labeling with 8-N3[32P]cAMP and in vivo phosphorylation with 32PO4 provide sensitive methods for the identification of the surface cAMP receptor. Photoaffinity labeling achieves high specificity while in practice, the in vivo 32P labeling affords considerably higher sensitivity. Both methods allow fairly direct assays of cellular responses to an extracellular cAMP stimulus at the level of the receptor-a shift in electrophoretic mobility and a rise in phosphorylation. Quantification of the shift in mobility, assayed by photolabeling, has shown a strong correlation between modification of the receptor and adaptation. These labelling techniques will also help to elucidate the role of the concomidant changes in receptor phosphorylation, which may cause the change in electrophoretic mobility. Furthermore, photolabeling and 32P labeling will allow study of the possible multiple affinity classes of the cAMP receptor and of the possible expression of cAMP receptors in later stages of development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023679649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023679649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0076-6879(88)59027-4

DO - 10.1016/0076-6879(88)59027-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 2842593

AN - SCOPUS:0023679649

VL - 159

SP - 267

EP - 278

JO - ImmunoMethods

JF - ImmunoMethods

SN - 1046-2023

IS - C

ER -